Survivalist Forum banner
41 - 60 of 102 Posts
I think that it is hard to pass judegement without knowing the whole situation. I also think that if the guy is mentally incompetant to the point that he cannot give consent, he is being taken advantage of and his lover should be prosecuted.
 
Hitler already tried it. ...didn't work out so well.

No, he went about it all wrong.
He killed the living... bad idea, that makes everyone angry.


Yes, what I am talking about is technically eugenics.
Bite me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: matt18920
I personally believe that people with very low intelligence should be sterilized and not allowed to vote.
The gene pool needs a serious bleaching. Unfortunately, it will probably never happen because stupid people have already taken over the world.

Flame away.
**** like this is why most people don't take seventeen year old kids seriously. I was the same way when I was your age.

Instead of taking away people's capacity to reproduce and vote, let's just do away with public assistance ("welfare"). Doing away with the welfare mentality would solve a lot of our country's problems.
 
Instead of taking away people's capacity to reproduce and vote, let's just do away with public assistance ("welfare"). Doing away with the welfare mentality would solve a lot of our country's problems.
I agree with that... have for a long time.
It won't solve the entire problem, but it will do away with alot of the trash in this country.


**** like this is why most people don't take seventeen year old kids seriously. I was the same way when I was your age.
Your only 24 genius, that is but 7 years older than me.
Unlike you, i'm not at the age at which I think I know everything. I am very very far from thinking I know everything.
I do however have enough sense to know what simple things the world could do to solve its two main problems, overpopulation and bad DNA specimens.
 
Your only 24 genius, that is but 7 years older than me. Unlike you, i'm not at the age at which I think I know everything. I am very very far from thinking I know everything.
:D:

I do however have enough sense to know what simple things the world could do to solve its two main problems, overpopulation and bad DNA specimens.
Are you God Almighty?

If not, who are you (or anybody else for that matter) to decide who should be allowed to reproduce and who shouldn't?

These problems you speak of will be solved by natural means.
 
Discussion starter · #47 ·
Denying someone the right to have sex (unless hurting others or kids) is like denying someone the right to eat and breath. Sex is the most basic thing someone can do with another person.

Sooner or later you will be too dumb to drive a car, own a gun, buy a house, purchase healthcare, vote, or live without any other government help.
 
And just how are they going to enforce this very dodgy sounding ruling? If this ass clown has such a low IQ how will he understand that an old man wearing a long red gown and a ridiculous white powdered wig has forbidden him from having sex?

Makes me wonder which of the two is the most retarded.
When I was in the Army I rose to a rank that I was giving orders and responsible for them to be carried out. An older NCO told me that a leader should not issue orders that he knows will not be obeyed. I don't see how this order can be enforced with out a full time keeper for Alan.
XR750
 
I think anyone who is of sound mind should be prosecuted for having sex with someone unable to consent.

I do not think the person unable to consent should be forced to be sterilized or otherwise punished. If they want to spend all day in their room playing with their junk, that doesn't hurt anybody either.

I would not force a retarded person to terminate her pregnancy but I would try her partner for rape.
 
And just how are they going to enforce this very dodgy sounding ruling? If this ass clown has such a low IQ how will he understand that an old man wearing a long red gown and a ridiculous white powdered wig has forbidden him from having sex?

Makes me wonder which of the two is the most retarded.
Im sorry but I had visions of Santa Clause saying "HO HO HO No sex for you"
 
I do not think the person unable to consent should be forced to be sterilized or otherwise punished. If they want to spend all day in their room playing with their junk, that doesn't hurt anybody either.
Being sterilized does not prevent one from having sex, it simply removes the possibility of sperm being involved with anything. (i'm trying to tread lightly with my wording)
 
Being sterilized does not prevent one from having sex, it simply removes the possibility of sperm being involved with anything. (i'm trying to tread lightly with my wording)
I understand that, but I do not find mandatory sterilization ethical. Whether for physical or mental defect.

If you wanted to offer people with physical disabilities a tax-break or other incentive to forgo biological reproduction I could support that but not forcible sterlization.
 
I understand that, but I do not find mandatory sterilization ethical. Whether for physical or mental defect.

If you wanted to offer people with physical disabilities a tax-break or other incentive to forgo biological reproduction I could support that but not forcible sterlization.

What will matter more in 100 years?
The fact that an unintelligent person didn't get their feeling hurt?
Or the fact that said unintelligent person was unable to create more unintelligent people?
 
What will matter more in 100 years?
The fact that an unintelligent person didn't get their feeling hurt?
Or the fact that said unintelligent person was unable to create more unintelligent people?

or he could be remembered as the start of social cleansing for low intelligent, low wage earnning ppl :eek:

what if it gets perverted to the point of anyone who make less than $1,000,000 per year cannt have children.

at one time america was heading in that direction :eek:



 
41 - 60 of 102 Posts