Survivalist Forum banner

U.S. Cannot Protect Homeland From Iranian, North Korean Missile Strikes

3K views 39 replies 27 participants last post by  9mmMike  
#1 ·
#8 ·
Given the US can't stop hackers from infecting hospitals and businesses which effectively shuts them down until they pay a ransom to unlock the key, I am certain we do not have the technical expertise to defeat much of anything. Think about it. We all get tons of phishing EMAILS every day from scammers, ISIS is recruiting at will, and bad guys in Russia, Somalia, and other nations have created a cottage industry of using technology to harvest personal data for identity theft.

We have a completely incompetent government squandering our national treasure while simultaneously opening our borders to all manners of invaders. We can't stop them, track them, or even verify if they can work here because we lack the political will. You bet your ass that we can't defend ourselves from much of anything! The only thing this government can do is to pay people to not work, to waste money on programs that don't work, and to enrich defense contractors by having them build sophisticated systems that are prohibitively expensive and can be easily defeated by insiders or those who have penetrated the security veil.

Think about how easy it is to build an Obamacare website vs a system that can detect and defeat an incoming missile, any time, any place, 24x7 with virtually no down time. Then rest well knowing that a community organizer is commander-in-chief.
 
#14 ·
Here's a quote from the article in the OP:

At this point, the system has only demonstrated “a partial capability [to defend] against small numbers of simple ballistic missiles,” according to the report..
Since right now the total number of missiles that can reach the US Homeland known to be in possession of North Korea and Iran is zero, it seems likely the system is up to the threat.
 
#17 ·
Here's a quote from the article in the OP:
Since right now the total number of missiles that can reach the US Homeland known to be in possession of North Korea and Iran is zero, it seems likely the system is up to the threat.
Yes, right now.
But what about 5 years from now?
The DOD is on the verge of canning the ABM's because of cost.
Where will they be in 5 years?
 
#19 ·
Well I think there is some BS associated with this story although I could be wrong

http://www.lockheedmartin.com/us/products/thaad.html

http://www.raytheon.com/capabilities/products/patriot/

We saw the patriot missile system in action many years ago with success during the 1st Gulf War, I'm pretty sure it has advanced since then.

THAAD is even more sophisticated

I'm not going to say something cannot get through but the USA has more and better protection than all the other nations in the world

If you'll read the links, the Patriot missile system has a pretty good success rate

As other posters have eluded to the amounts of missiles either country can launch, they haven't always proved to be successful and the response we can give is enormous.

I currently have other worries than North Korea or Iran

EMP may take some things out and it may not. There are a tremendous amount of variables associated with a perceived EMP strike against us. Most all of it is hypothesized and sensationalized
 
#24 ·
An EMP as a terror strike would end up killing millions and plunging a large part of the USA into darkness that could take months to rebuild from. Over the east coast could cause a cascading failure that could take down almost the entire grid for weeks. In concert with ground based terror attacks it could be very bad. The idea that they need dozens of missiles is so 1960's. So China pushes their buddies to EMP us then steps in with "help" placing troops inside the USA where they claim their rights as owners since we owe them something like 2 trillion.
 
#27 ·
North Korea doesn't have missiles that can reach North America? I heard John "warmonger" McCain make that same ignorant comment on a TV news show. Duh!

The Nork's have succeeded in orbiting 2 satellites. Remember your basic orbital mechanics folks. If you can orbit one, you can de-orbit one pretty much where you want, like in North America!

They may not have a small enough nuke yet to fit on top, but they could put some HE, biological/chemical, or dirty bomb on one and have a reasonable chance of dropping it on a major city like LA, NY ...
 
#33 ·
As of Superbowl Sunday, that is no longer true, NK has orbited it's first payload. So whatever you had to say dismissively, well you are wrong. They now have all the pieces of the puzzle.

But the USA also has anti-missile-missiles, I know of three currently operational systems and one older system.

Once again what is described in the media does not reflect reality.

Guys,

Don't forget, there's this thing called RE-ENTRY

Just because you can get a missile up there, it still needs to come down intact and be able to go off at a predetermined altitude for maximum yield!

NK's ability to have an actual atomic reaction are in question much less the fission-fusion required for their "so called" hydrogen test which was tested at a location somewhere besides on the tip of a missile. It also had an extremely low yield so common thinking is that it didn't really obtain the necessary stages of nuclear reaction for a fission-fusion device

EMP is a concern but what it will really do is a big question mark. It will only affect the civilian side of our country. Our military as far as critical infrastructure is hardened already.

A very low yield atomic device (not thermonuclear) as they have tested is not very likely to give the EMP that everyone is so scared of plus it has to go off in an area to be of concern.

Right now, all NK has done is shown they can set off large amounts of TNT and spread radiation and fire a missile into the air.

Their satellite consists of something orbiting the earth, one is not transmitting anything and the other is tumbling. Both will burn up in the atmosphere in time
 
#35 ·
the only thing that scares me about North Korea is that China could secretly send them some serious weapons and have NK go through with deploying them...

Kind of like how the US gives other countries weapons (TURKEY, SAUDI ARABIA?) and has them carry out the dirty deeds in the name of their own country instead of the name of the US....

I believe it can be referred to as "proxy warfare."
 
#39 ·
John, a single nuke exploded 300 miles above Nebraska if it is constructed properly (for example with a cobalt enriched case to maximize the gamma flux) could cripple the entire electrical grid for the USA. It would cause zero damage itself, however the EMP would kill millions over the next few weeks to months beginning with all those on life support in hospitals, then those that have only 3 days or less food put away, then those dependent on medications that have to be refrigerated. Not to mention millions in the cities that loose power, water and sewer and have no clue how to deal with anything other than where the nearest Starbucks is and who is playing the next sports game. We aren't talking about a ground burst, actually a ground burst is an incredible waste of a nuke if you want to do the most damage.
 
#40 ·
Yes, the retribution the submarines and silos would deal out would be horrendous and the agent country would be blasted to the glass age. But remember on one hand we are dealing with an insane megalomaniac that reminds me of one of the villains in a Bond movie and the other countries glorify death and would gladly blow themselves and their country to hell to get at us. We are not dealing with sanity, we are dealing with ****house dog insanity.