Survivalist Forum banner

The Coming Crisis: White Collar Homelessness

2K views 13 replies 13 participants last post by  mongoose  
#1 ·
Last month, unemployment rates surged to 7.6 percent. As the jobless population becomes older and more educated, many are ending up with no car, no job prospects, no health insurance, and - before long - no home. Will the dramatic increase of unemployment change the face of homelessness in America?

According to data from the Labor Department, more jobs have been lost in the past 12 months than any other period since the government began keeping records in 1939. Perhaps most disconcerting is that experts predict unemployment will get worse before it gets better. In 1991 and 2001, unemployment didn't hit its peak until two years after those recessions ended.

As unemployment becomes worse, community-based organizations are noticing a change in their clientele. Shelters are seeing clients who are more representative of the newly unemployed. Here's what one non-profit, Partnering for Change, reported on their blog just last week:

In recent months we've noticed a change in the needs of our program feeding homeless children. I've mentioned, there are over 11,000 elementary age children in Orange County, CA who are homeless. They are homeless for different reasons. But here's a scenario you wouldn't think would take place:

http://homelessness.change.org/blog/view/the_coming_crisis_white_collar_homelessness



If the US Government took the same money they are pouring onto the bankers and gave it back to the people (whose money it is anyway) each and every one of us would get about $30,000.

We could pay our mortgages. That would end the mortgage crisis.

We could pay our credit cards. That would end the credit crisis.

We could start new businesses. That would create jobs. That would end the unemployment crisis.

Those new businesses could make products for export. That would end the trade imbalance.

Why on Earth are they not doing this? Or at least slashing taxes by 50% which would produce the same result?

Instead the government has taken $8 trillion from the people to give to the banks so the banks can loan it back to us at interest!

This is like seeing a house burning and deciding that the best way to put out the fire is to rip wood from all the other houses to try to smother the flames!!!!!

Are the wealthy in this nation so greedy that they would not surrender their hold on our throats just long enough for us to stand back up again?

ReichGirl
 
#2 ·
wait, this socialist slobs stimulus bill will give the every day working person and extra $13.00 a week in his pay check ( I feel so light head and have a tingly feeling running down my leg). Thats enough to put some of us into a higher tax bracket so we can pay more taxes. So those who don't lift a finger can get more money.
 
#3 ·
I agree

I agree! It does not make a bit of since what our government are doing with our money, giving it to people who screwed up in the first place, with no regulation? What is up with that! Constantly on the news you hear and read that places such as food banks and churches are running low and cant handle the inrush of people. They think it is bad now, just wait a year, it will be 10 times worse!
 
#4 ·
I read an ad in the Atlanta Craigslist today from a homeowner selling a porta potty. He said his water had been shut off a month ago. Apparently he had been using the portable john. I didn't understand why he was selling the pooper. I got the impression that he was getting ready to bug out just ahead of foreclosure.
 
#7 ·
Ironically, (and I'm sure I will get flamed for this), I bet a great number of the new or soon-to-be homeless voted for Obama.

While I have sympathy, of course. I am sure these people will be shocked to find that the stimulus stimulated them right out of their homes and that Obama did not save them.


As Schiff has said (about TARP's failure), its like giving your teenager a lot of alcohol and a car, then being surprised when they crash and burn the car.
 
#8 ·
if it was to ever tax filer it would probably be $60,000
if it was to ever tax payer it would probably be $90,000
 
#9 ·
Don't use the stimulous money to redistribute wealth around. What they need to do is cut taxes. Not little tax breaks and refunds here and there, I mean stop income tax. I know the government needs that money but tough sh*t. They are just going to have to call in debts in thrid world countries and tax others for services the government provides because the people are getting taxed to the point they will no longer be able to pay taxes.

Like Celente said there will be a tax rvolt if this government continues down the path it's on. Just like the revolts of the past that were fixed by the government reverseing theor agenda. I have a feeling though this administration is not going to slash taxes anytime soon. I have a feeling we are going to sink into revolution and this one is going to be bad.

-Cade
 
#10 ·
Wealth redistribution happens every time you make a purchase or work an honest day's work. The problem isn't wealth redistribution in general, the problem is when it's only bottom-up.

One of the things I learned while studying anthropology is the idea of a potlatch: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potlatch. In traditional cultures, the wealthy were *expected* and obligated to redistribute some of their wealth to the community.

Can't say I voted for Obama, and I think even less of the Rethugs, but I'm awfully tired of the working/middle-class not championing its own interests.
 
#13 ·
if everyone had 30,000 that would just make money more worthless... as the dollar goes down value goes down if everyone got 30,000 that means alot of people will go buy stuff or take a vacation and spend it or on bills meaning someone else gets the money but wait that 30,000 would have to be from everyone pocket to get that money... wait that wont work printing money = bad idea...


Why not just make a goverment run bank for the people so money can still flow.. and they say screw you to bad run companys they going down sooner or latter..
 
#12 ·
Yes it is 9 trillion.

Anyway, why would I want to pay for somebody who has a better house and car any more than I want to give it to the financiers? You guys batting around this idea of passing out these multi-thousand dollar checks-do you have any idea how fast everything would be GONE? There would be nothing on the shelves. The idiots would buy up all toys, and the preppers would buy up every morsel of food. You can slow down the onset of inflation by injecting it in at the top, or you can mainline it right to the consumer. It's gonna be bad either way. No bailouts; the damage is done and there is no patching it over.
 
#14 ·
Wouldnt be worthless -- i would spend it on preps - wpns n ammo before it had a chance ta devalue