Survivalist Forum banner

Swiss K-31's avalable soon.

9.5K views 57 replies 21 participants last post by  steve marshall  
#1 ·
Some just got imported, should be for sale before too long.
(GREAT rifles... You'll regret not picking some up)

Ammo too I believe, although it's avalable and can be made from commercial components..... The rifles and ammo are both match grade.

SO MUCH FUN to shoot!
 
#2 ·
Those have been up at Classic for a minute.

I personally love them. It's worth noting that they were made from 1933-1958, and around 500,000 were made. That means they aren't exactly as plentiful as Mosins.
GP-11 is my favorite milsurp ammo ever.

Any idea on upcoming costs? I see them regularly at $300.
 
#15 ·
I wouldn't say that......

The Finns killed an ass load of Germans with their rifles...

The Germans had " mo' betterer guns" too.

It is the operator, not the equipment that decides the fight.

Mall ninja chair borne guy with a scar vs. Trained disciplined ex soldier with M39.....

Mall ninja better hope to get lucky:thumb:

I know who my $$$ is on.
 
#16 ·
Okay. I'll play. Flat terrain. Trained ex-soldier with a 45-70 and 5 cartridges vs. mall ninja with AR and a bandoleer. I know who my money is on.

The Finns fought the Russians not the Germans and had pretty much equivalent arms.

In addition, I'd take the Finns against the Swiss in a heartbeat. Better leadership, tactics and rifles.

Did I win?
 
#18 ·
Okay. I'll play. Flat terrain. Trained ex-soldier with a 45-70 and 5 cartridges vs. mall ninja with AR and a bandoleer. I know who my money is on.
Hell that gun (lets assume Marlin 1895) in the hands of an experienced hunter vs a mall ninja with an AR and the mall ninja is still going down.

I do have to say several of the ex soldiers that I know that have tried my 1895 failed miserably with it. Most it had an issue with working the action so that it was able to reliably eject and feed (working it to slow). A few had issues with the recoil.
 
#19 ·
Define "flat terrain" more. Are they in a big field facing each other at 1000 yards with some cover here and there (ditches, cars, bushes)? Or are they standing across an open and completely empty field 50 yards from each other, shooting on the count of three? In any scenario, I'd pick the trained or veteran shooter, regardless of weapon, but there are higher odds of the untrained guy getting the first hit if they are standing still in the open, because it's more like the paper targets the untrained guy has probably practiced on. Main issue in that scenario for the untrained guy would just be nerves.

But if there's ANY strategy required - for example, cars to crouch behind, distance to cover to get in effective range, the other person is moving, etc - the trained guy's advantage goes up drastically.

The weapon is a factor but not the main factor.
 
#21 ·
This is a survival forum. One isn't likely to use a K-31 hunting squirrels. My statement was only that the K-31 was not the best choice for a combat rifle.

Why 5 rounds, because that's likely what's in the magazine tube.
Bandoleer, because that's what ninja's carry + 10 or so magazines.
Trained ex-soldiers would likely be lost with the trajectory of the 45-70.

Many considered the M26 light machine gun to be the best in the world at the time.
And the Mosin as fielded by the Finns would in my opinion be a much better war rifle than a
K-31.

I once hit a clay pigeon at 70 yards with a Chief's Special. If I ever publish my memoirs, it won't be a paragraph long either. It probably was luck. And Dixon didn't use a 45-70 .

Do I win now?
 
#23 ·
"Winning" aside, the K31 is a great rifle for those that collect military arms. I've had a couple, and still have one. Superb accuracy, and an action like you'd expect the Swiss to make. Not to mention, it is relatively easy to find "tiger striped" K31 stocks that often make premium European walnut stocks look plain.

Whether it's a good choice for survival? Meh. If I got rid of every gun I own based solely on it's practicality, my collection would likely drop by 2/3's. :thumb: