Survivalist Forum banner

Survival Camouflage

38K views 67 replies 28 participants last post by  MagicPuff  
#1 ·
George's Magnum Opus for Survival Camouflage, I will go over in the next few weeks cover everything the Survivor needs to know about camouflage in one place.

First we need to cover the threat. First the obvious, visual, range first in the desert or great planes you can be seen for miles, in suburbia/urban landscapes the buildings/trees/junk limits visual detection to a few hundreds at most, in forest/jungle detection range can be feet. So what you need is specific to where you are traveling through. Now camouflage does not make you invisible, what it does is make detection harder and decreases the range that someone has to approach you before they see you hopefully giving you a chance to avoid contact altogether.

Let’s take each in order, desert or great planes, first range means that patterns would be of little or no use because it all blends together from far out. For green (Springtime) grassland you would want a pale medium green which would blend into the grass. For dry Summer grassland or sandy desert: khaki or US “3-color desert” pattern will work. For red or rocky desert, US “6-color desert” is pretty good. A-TACS and Multicam work well in all of these.

Suburbia/urban this medium range is where camouflage patterns should shine for example leopard spots and spotted patterns like German flectarn and Dot 44 do in fact make you invisible to human and animal brains so long as you do not move. This has to do with the way the visual cortex processes information from the eyes. Once you move you can be seen. One argument against wearing camouflage at all is that this sets off police/military/animals who see you as either prey or a threat and instantly starts a fight and the whole point was to avoid a fight. So this I ask what are the alternatives? The homeless guy look? That too enrages policemen. All gray clothes? These have a “uniform” look that sets off the military. So ultimately camouflage or gray clothing makes little difference. About the best would be a mix of non-descript civilian clothing of gray/brown/green/khaki all in a dull medium shade or you could just wear camouflage.

The last is jungle/forest land, guess what you do not need camouflage there. Why not? Well it is the range factor, you would be hidden behind vegetation. For example both the USMC in WWII and the US Army in Vietnam tried camouflage uniforms and determined that a solid green was better than faded cammies. It has been tried, solid medium green is better.
So over all you do not always need cammies much at all, not in the daytime. So what is the big whoop? Well there are some places & times where you need camouflage and not having it will get you killed, and that is what is being discussed here. Next Night Vision Technology and it’s threat.

What about those times where you need to lower your visibility just to stay alive? Obviously traveling at night is the correct answer why because it severely limits the bad guy’s ability to detect you. The problem is that Night Vision equipment is being handed out like candy to a large number of not so nice people and it is readily available to anyone except you. Examples are we gave a bunch to Iran which promptly changed sides and the Egyptian Army which will be soon under the control of the Muslim Brotherhood, small town police departments across the USA who’s only claim to fame is revenue enhancements for the local mayor who is also the Judge. The Police “enhancements” provided to such “Law enforcement Agencies” by the US Dept. of Fatherland Security end up on eBay within hours. US Military Night Vision goggles go missing all the time. So whether you are the sort who believe that police can do no wrong or believe they are jack booted thugs, Night Vision equipment is out there and will be used against you.

We need to talk about Night Vision equipment and settle on terminology so we can even discuss this intelligently so I will give a name and a bit of information about the major types and the threat of emerging technologies.
First the oldest detection device the Mark 1 Eyeball, two each as issued. Most of us are utterly unaware that we can see in the dark. The retina contains two types of photoreceptors, rods and cones. The rods are more numerous, some 120 million, and are more sensitive than the cones. However, they are not sensitive to color. The 6 to 7 million cones provide the eye's color sensitivity and they are much more concentrated in the central yellow spot known as the macula. The rods give us our night vision and are somewhat sensitive to light in the Near Infra-Red and Ultra Violet. I for example can see trees on pitch black nights well enough to not walk into them. This is hard to explain everything is grey but trees and people are black if that makes any sense. See:

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/vision/rodcone.html

Next there were two or more Night Vision devices available to the German Military at the end of WWII, one a crude heat sensor was of little use but was undoubtedly the forerunner of modern thermal sights, this would allow the detection of heat from a human body.

Second was what we today would call Active Infra-Red (Active IR).
The way it works: Near Infra-Red light is converted to visible light in a phosphor tube, this is very inefficient and needed a spotlight with a dark lens allowing only IR light to escape.
Frequency range: NIR
Counter measures: Detection, all NV equipment can detect the IR Spotlight (IR Illuminator) so if you see a spotlight through your NVGs but not with your eyeballs….
Counter measures: Avoidance, German WWII Leibmustertarn, Swiss Alpine-flage and US M-1981 Woodland uniforms were designed to deal with this NV Technology.
Users: Germany, USSR, the USA and their client states are all lavishly equipped but most has gone to the surplus market as newer generations of NV have come on line. Still in use today.

Next Starlight scopes were introduced as the next replacement for the Active IR systems.
How it works: Same as older IR except an image amplifier is added to increase light by 30,000+ times before being displayed thus eliminating the IR Spotlight. Also called first, second and third generation for light amplification tube inside.
Counter measures: Detection these are passive but do not work in total darkness so ambushes in basements, buildings, caves, tunnels, sewers and heavy forest can force users to use IR illuminators and give away their positions.
Counter measures: Avoidance: All uniforms marked “NIR Compliant” will decrease your signature at night. Although called “passive” to these systems these are both. Avoid the Black BDUs loved by SWAT teams, these glow white when illuminated with NIR light.
CCD or Charge Coupled Device is an eyeball on a chip, new Night Vision devices like rifle scopes and NVGs are coming online that are high quality and low price, very similar to Starlight Scopes with the same limitations. See:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charge-coupled_device

Thermal scopes/cameras: the latest and greatest Night Vision.
How it works: Takes long wavelength IR (heat) and turns it into images.
Counter measures: Detection, 1rst generation large bulky and requires a lot of power to operate, so most are vehicle or aircraft mounted, detect the carrier by sound.
Counter measures: Avoidance, space blankets, wool blankets can decrease your thermal signature enough to not be noticed.
Counter measures: Deception rubber glows in this band and can be used for decoys.
Weakness: Works well in the cold but is often blind on hot days when everything is hot.
New Tech CCD thermals in the same scope as CCD Starlight between the two there are few weaknesses, The US Army has purchases as many as 13,000 of these CCD Combos in 2011.
Counter measures: Avoidance: wool & space blankets, move low and slow.

Other tech that exists but nobody is using it yet:

Ultra Violet detection, almost all civilian camouflage glows in UV and is easily seen by prey animals like deer. Even garage made UV detector could pick up name brand commercial cammies at long range day or night.
Counter measures: Avoidance: Do not use commercial laundry detergent and apply “UV Killer” to your cammies.

IR camouflage detection was used extensively in WWII but is unknown today. Simply placing an IR pass filter on a CCD camera can detect most non-NIR camouflaged camo.

Multi-Spectra sensors like the CCD Thermal/Starlight duo but with several other tricks will be a stone cold bitch to avoid and they are coming.
Overview of camouflage clothing available today all commercial camouflage patterns suck in the UV, Near Infra-Red and are poor in the visible due to bleach fading & UV brighteners.

Military camouflage can be okay but cheap Chinese fakes and deliberately downgraded dyes/cloth like “Multicam VS” make buying Military Uniforms a very iffy proposition at best. There is good stuff out there but you have to test it to be sure. Avoid Propper brand Polyester like the plague! More later..
 
#4 ·
Good write up. Twyggy the reason to avoid Propper brand Polyester is through night vision they glow real bright. Notice what he said about woodland BDU's. I use woodland over the new patters for just that reason it works day or night where most other patterns just don't. I know what I am doing, and nothing of mine glows under night vision devices. If you have gear you plan on surviving with, I suggest you guys think about how you wash them. I only wash mine with hunting detergent with no UV brightners, and the same for any water proofing applied. $ for $ the nest cammo for the woods is woodland that covers day and night, get it while you can, they are not making it anymore. Now is the time too buy it. Never wash it with your regular cloths, and always wash with no bleach and brighter detergents.
 
#6 ·
AZB, I'm not sure, but it would be worth looking for. One thing is for sure, if you wash it in any regular detergents it doesn't matter what kind of camo it is, even woodland glows if you do that. This is also why I never starch my uniforms now. A simple ironing will do, but I don't even bother with that now.
 
#8 ·
It is the Pollyester from Propper to avoid.

I talked to Crye Precision:

http://www.cryeprecision.com/

Crye told me to avoid "MulticamVS" because it is not "NIR Compliant." Crye also told me that Pollyester can not be IR dyed like 100% cotton and 50/50% Nylon/Cotton can.

I talked to Propper because they sold me some non-NIR-camouflaged ACUs and they lied to me and sent me a caned answer that obviously was not writen in response to my eMail. Two possibilities, one is they have an attitude problem, the other is that they as a Government contractor are trying to sell the good stuff to Uncle Sam and down graded junk to every one else to make Uncle Sam happy, ie, they are doing this at US Government request. Now they could have just told me that, but they BSed me and I caught them. So they are Jerks the question is why?

Duro, they print Multicam which is "NIR-Compliant" and MulticamVS which is not "NIR-Compliant." I bought 30 yards from them and tested it against a set of brand new ACUs that I bought from the US Army Clothing Sales Store and there was a difference so I contacted DURO and asked them about it, they BSed me and I caught the lie, rather than explain the difference they refunded my money and let me keep the very expensive Multicam cloth.

So is there a conspiracy to down grade all non-military camouflage? I can not prove it one way or the other but I am sure beginning to wonder. If this was not an issue with the military then there would not be such a thing as "NIR-Compliant."

One thing I do know is that Propper brand Pollyester is not "NIR-Compliant."

More later...
 
#9 ·
NIR-camouflaged uniforms, why?

A blerb from a PLA web site that ABC does not credit:

http://www.9abc.net/index.php/archives/32146

with inherent anti-detection performance as camouflage, uniforms greatly improved within a short distance of the camouflage effect.
experts point out that the past is hand-painted camouflage uniforms, different colors are sharp boundaries between. Now use the visual pixel dot-matrix theory, making the edges between different colors blurred, the relatively high number of camouflage. In addition, the camouflage also uses a special dye, not only can escape the naked eye, also has a part in low-light and infrared band of anti-surveillance as “unique skills.” And supporting new training uniform, soldiers will be equipped with new combat boots, upper flame, sole stab, to reduce the weight of each shoe 100 grams, the comfort and functionality enhancements.”


Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

What I get fron reading that is the Chinese Army has adopted NIR-camouflaged uniforms and maybe Thermal camouflage too. The reason I am wondering is that severial paragraphs before this “Gold content” is mentioned.

So most of the world’s Armies use NIR-camouflaged uniforms, why is that unless it is important to do so?
 
#10 ·
i find just earth colored plaid and some blue jeans is cammo enough for most things

and for others i like to keep a 70-15-15 mix of tan brown and green in my color pattern plus veg

works well but like i said plaid and jeans for 99% of things works just fine

and even with NV stuff its all green movement is what will get you faster than what you are or not wearing
 
  • Like
Reactions: rover
#13 ·
The fast answer is to go down to an Army Surplus store, buy a used set of Milspec ACUs, how you tell if it is "The Good Stuff" is look for the IR reflector tab on the sleeves. Take the pant, jacket & hat then dump them in a washing machine with one box of "RIT DARK GREEN" dye and a half cup of salt. What you end up with is a set of cammies that are a mottled green in the visible and mottled in the NIR. Cheap, available and "The Good Stuff."

Well that has been my big complaint Even when you buy from Propper (a Government Contractor turning out Milspec uniforms) you have to test what you get to see if it is NIR Camouflaged, even the Military has that problem below is a quote from The Army Times website about a new round of testing:

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Army Preparing to Produce Baseline Camo Gear for Testing
Natick has released a Special Notice making known their intent to “negotiate on a sole source basis with Beyond Clothing, LLC” to produce 310 sets of “AOR 1/2 Fabric (50/50 Nyco), Helmet Covers, Pants and Blouses. These uniforms are among the baseline uniforms required for camouflage testing and evaluation.”
Army-style uniforms and OCIE do not exist in the AOR 1 & 2 patterns. What’s more, the patterns are restricted, so any gear must be manufactured by a company already certified to handle the fabric. OCP, or as it is commercially known, MultiCam is the other baseline pattern for the upcoming field trial phase of the US Army Camouflage Improvement Effort. Due to its use in Afghanistan, there is already an ample supply of the equipment available.
One interesting note. Currently, OCP is only issued as the FR ACU and not the standard FR ACU. While much work has been done to color match dyed TenCate’s Defender-M fabric used to manufacture the FR ACU, the pattern may look differently than it would when printed on 50/50 NYCO. This is a variance that will have to be considered in performance unless the Army also pursues the acquisition of an adequate number of OCP NYCO test uniforms. If they are commercially sourced, further care will need to be taken that such uniforms are not in the so-called MultiCam VS print which does not provide NIR protection.
These ‘baseline’ Government issue patterns will be pitted against four commercial families of patterns to determine the best performer and possible new Army issue camouflage.
The commercial finalists are:
ADS Inc as Prime, partnered with Guy Cramer
Brookwood Companies
Crye Precision
Kryptek
"

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

So even Uncle Sam now risks screwing up his own camouflage testing program because of this war on camouflage.
 
#16 ·
Can one think of any instance where UCP would blend nicely? I remember when they switched and some had UCP and others had plain BDU. That white (call it what you will, its basically white and gray) would light up a silhouette in the moonlight like a piece of chrome.

Perhaps it would work in a fallout/volcano ash scenario, or perhaps for hiding in lunar gravel?
 
#17 ·
Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Image


The MultiCam® camouflage system is patented. Copyright ©2010
Crye Precision LLC. All rights reserved. MultiCam is a registered
trademark of Crye Precision LLC. Blah, blah, blah…


Multicam, what is so cool about it? The pattern itself is blotchy, cool that works at medium range, the problem with splotches is at close range you see a man with splotches. The answer is that the splotches in MultiCam fade so at close range, it ain’t splotchy no more. Close range, cool, medium range cool, so what about long range? The overall tone is medium which blends in better than any other shade, so short, medium and long is covered.
What about color? The cloth is semi-mirrored so it looks green in a green environment, brown/brown, gray/gray, pink/pink and yes there are pink deserts, Now here is what is cool it is mirrored in NIR too so whatever hue the landscape is, MultiCam resembles it.
What about twilight? This is where the human eye works best Eagles can see a little better than a human in broad daylight but not much, Owls likewise have a slight edge in night vision over humans. In the twilight while both Eagles and Owls are blind, humans can see just fine. This is the time where color fades out and we see in black and white. What does this have to do with MultiCam? You see the little black and white (actually tan and chocolate) spots? In the twilight the pattern becomes tiger stripes.
Cool huh? I personally believe that MultiCam is the greatest thing since the invention of crunchy peanut butter. Now why in the name of all that is good and holy did the Army pick the horrible UCP over MultiCam? IMVHO: Royalties, the developers would have to be paid $0.10 per uniform and they just can not stand capitalism in their little red hearts.

There are multiple flavors of MultiCam and I will tell you what little I know:
1. MultiCam as developed, see the above description.
2. MultiCamVS made in USA, stands for “Visual Spectrum” this is deliberately downgraded junk, not NIR-Compliant. Do not buy!
3. OCP (Operation Enduring Freedom Camouflage Pattern) MultiCam but the NIR dyes and properties “Tweeked” for Afghanistan.
4. MTP or "Multi Terrain Pattern" a British variation of MultiCam but changed just enough to be copyrightable like the USMC did with Marpat.
5. Chinese Multicam, same as #2, let the buyer beware. Do not buy!

Lets talk about material.
1. 65/35% polyester/cotton, not NIR-Compliant. Do not buy!
2. I have never seen 100% cotton MultiCam, no data, sorry.
3. 50/50 Nylon/cotton (also called NYCO) this supposedly does not exist, how ever I have a pair and these are NIR-Camouflaged, mine were made before the “NIR-Compliance Milspec” was established.
4. FR or Fire Retardant, 65/25/10% Rayon/Para-Armid/Nylon also has Permethrin.
5. 100% Nylon used for web gear, I assume NIR-Compliant, but who knows?
 
#18 ·
Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

5. 100% Nylon used for web gear, I assume NIR-Compliant, but who knows?
I do. Look at the 1 quart woodland Canteen covers in woodland camo, there are several types of materials that were used, let us look at the last two variations.

(1) See this canteen cover, It is not NIR compliant, notice the black Q&R buckle. This is the second to the last variation they made.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/NEW-1-QT-CA...ms=algo=SIC&its=I&itu=UCI%2BIA%2BUA%2BFICS%2BUFI&otn=21&pmod=290360091403&ps=54

(2) Is a Mollee two pouch that looks exactly the same as the above one, except the Q&R buckle will be tan or green. I tried to find one, but gave up, looks like everyone has scarfed most of them up already. I own 3 of them.
Basically,if it is Mollee 2 and with a black Q&Rit is mostly compliant, if it has a tan or green Q&R it is fully compliant. I had my RPK pouches made in this material. The guy put the black fasteners on though, but he did say he would switch them for me.

http://compare.ebay.com/like/290360091403?var=lv&ltyp=AllFixedPriceItemTypes&var=sbar

There ya go, I found some of the 100% ones.

NIR compliant uniforms use a special fabric that allows soldiers to appear at the same radiation level as the surrounding terrain, thus making them more difficult to detect. As you can understand, this could be a matter of life and death. Please ask before you buy. If the Seller cannot tell you with 100% certainty - keep looking until you find the real thing. All Nylon is not the same.
 
#23 ·
If you read the first line in the specs, it said: "The TRU-SPEC Tactical Response Uniform (TRU) Trousers is based on the Army Combat Uniform"

Notice highlighted words. Don't be afraid to buy surplus to be assured to get the real thing. The only problem with that is if it has been starched, it is pretty useless. Your best bet it to get someone in service to buy you some on post.

Read this, it should help. http://www.ar15.com/archive/topic.html?b=6&f=10&t=347388

When you do a search, type in type of camo, then add NIR compliant, such as: Multicam NIR compliant
 
#21 ·
If you read down on that page it says that the Material is:

"50/50 Nylon/Cotton ripstop fabric (3-Color Desert Camo, MULTICAM and Woodland Camo)"

So I suspect that it is good, the dead give away is the price $42 to $83, the good material is expensive. Remember the "NIR-Compliant" Milspec is very recent (2011) and these may have been produced before that even existed if these are the $83 shirts & $83 pants I bet they are "The Good Stuff."

As far as I know nobody is advertizing "NIR-Compliant" MultiCam which drives me nuts!
 
#25 ·
All recent ISSUED military uniforms will be "NIR-Compliant" however all that means it that a uniform meets the NIR Milspec that does not mean that it is all that great.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

http://mpmuseum.org/securuniform/cadpat/cadpat_tw_proto.jpg

Image


Let us then discuss Digital Camouflage.

The British Army and the US Army were both experimenting with pixilated camouflage back in the 1970s but for tanks not for uniforms.

The underlying ideas go back even further; basically digital camouflage is a computer age variation of using 1mm square spots (pixels) for dithering (blending the edges). So at long range the spots blend the colors, at medium range they make the edges blur and at close range the patterns fall apart and you see spots which the human brain does not process well if stationary.

CadPat was introduced in 1996 by the Canadian Army which developed it. All other pixilated camouflages are literally plagiarized photocopies of CadPat including Canadian Arid, Winter/Arctic and Urban, USMC MarPat & Desert MarPat, US Army’s Universal Camouflage Pattern, & Universal Camouflage Pattern Delta, and the US Navy’s NWU, AOR I & II camouflage patterns and countless Chinese copies.

CadPat aka temperate woodland (TW) is called that because of the (peculiar to the USN/USMC) abbreviation of Marine Pattern in to “MarPat” therefore…..CadPat. CadPat is NIR-Camouflaged but not NIR-Compliant as the Canadians do not have to meet the US Army’s silly Milspecs.

Getting a pair of CadPats, well unless your brother joins the Canadian Army, you are not getting a pair. 99% of CadPats available are Chinese copies. Now I have a pair of cheap Chinese made CadPats, and they are visually stunning, but I have never worn them as I am quite sure that they would fade down. Oddly the first generation of CadPats faded and worked better faded out however the Canadians fixed that “problem” with the second batch produced which tells me it is more about fashion than camouflage.

There is a company called HyperStealth that develops camouflage based on Fractal Geometry but because of the color palette used results in uniform patterns that look exactly or almost exactly like the CadPat based pixilated patterns mentioned above. This is an example of where two separate concepts end up back at the same place because what works, works.

Speaking of HyperStealth, they (claimed to have) developed a super secret predator suit that may or may not be equipping secret US ninjas as we speak. There is a YouTube video that keeps getting taken down:


Real or not?