No, we are disgusted at the misuse of babies.
Cultural Marxism, like all of Marxism, is confrontational. Uninterested in debating with the purpose of coming to an agreement, because they would lose outright, Marxists instead resort to attacking, anything from the outright genocides of Russia and China to the tearing down of the greatest institutions of Western civilization.
As such, they view attempts to ration with them as an attack. They send their demands as an attack, thus they view any non-agreement as an attack. Think about it, they claim that disagreeing with them causes them emotional, thus physical distress equal to acts of violence, and that is how they justify their proactive violence, claiming that it is reactive. They burn and loot and attack people and professors and speakers with whom they disagree.
Because all attempts to educate, debate, or otherwise ration with them are framed as an attack, they hide behind classes of people against whom no person of good will would ever initiate violence. In this case, they are hiding behind babies.
Those are the elements, now let's assemble them:
If you disagree with their message, you are committing physical violence, and because they are speaking from the perspective of defenseless, innocent babies, if you disagree with replacing rights with special privileges for grievance groups, you are really PUNCHING A BABY, ironically hiding behind a group of people their opponents find most precious, though they esteem them no value.
They're basically saying, "Stop hitting this baby that you value, even though I dont. It makes you a bad person."
That's the twisted message. They tried it with a black President, and it worked for 6 years, but now claims of racism have worn out, so they have moved on to transes and rape culture and claims of hating babies.
