Survivalist Forum banner

Megyn Kelly losing her Midas touch ...

3.8K views 54 replies 38 participants last post by  FirstSergeant  
#1 ·
Seems like the Golden Girl is getting some fierce negative blowback for her "exclusive" interview with Alex Jones about the Sandy Hook shooting. JP Morgan just pulled its sponsorship of her show, and she is no longer hosting an event for Sandy Hook families. Her and boss Andrew Lack claim they are completely surprised by the opposition the soon-to-be-aired interview is causing. :rolleyes:

Sorry Megyn, enjoy the wrath of the karma gods. :thumb:
 
#5 ·
Megyn Kelly is a piece of crap. I used to see her as a bit of a shrew but attractive, but after her BS at the election I don't even see her as attractive anymore. She completely attacked Trump right out of the gate and you can tell by his response he was taken completely by surprise by that.
She's a complete tool, a fraud, and so is Alex jones. That interview is ridiculous because you have two deceitful self serving *******s trying to out maneuver each other, both trying to mask their true intention, which is to screw over the other one.

If you watch that video, pay attention around the 15 minute mark. Jones says what he does is satire and he doesn't believe what he says. He said he's playing a character, no different than if he put on a devil's costume.
He tipped his hand during the custody fight for his kids and here he lets us know for sure.
I've lost all respect for him, and never had any for her.
 
#14 ·
I used to see her as a bit of a shrew but attractive, but after her BS at the election I don't even see her as attractive anymore.
I call total bull**** on this statement. You mean if you go home right now and she is in your bedroom in an indecently short pink dress smiling suggestively you will not find her attractive?!!!!????!??? :)
 
#10 ·
It's not so much that she interviewed a controversial person, it's that she interviewed someone that the mockingbird media decided to not legitimize by letting him speak at all.
He IS a fraud, and probably a paid disinfo agent and a shill. One of his employees was covering an event and was asked to show ID, the employee showed a Time/Warner ID card.
It's not that he's legit, it's that as a disinfo agent he HAS TO bring up topics the mainstream media won't touch. She's a shrew but Megyn Kelly has a large viewership, and they don't want people to even know about some of those things he talks about. That's why they're angry
 
#26 ·
I went from liking her a lot in her early days at Fox, to loathing her in the last 12 months. Her hypocrisy rise to the top by posting near nude and then deriding others for "sexism" or "misogyny," her attacks on Trump, her overpaid salary for a lackluster show, and her ugly departure from Fox for CNN (the enemy) for greed. I do not like her at all now. I hope her show and career go into the toilet.

She got ahead purely because of her looks, and she has some education. I have more education and don't pull down $12,000,000 or whatever annually. So... that means she's the same hypocrite that uses her looks to get ahead, and then insult men who sign her checks or watch her shows as misogynists. Her and others like her can go spit. She'd be nowhere if she wasn't attractive.
 
#31 ·
Here is my take:

Major fan of her and have been watching her and Fox I guess as long as it been on.

Looks: Well the good looks wagon stopped at her house twice.

Smarts: Got it in spades!

So what happened? As she grew she began to change, her hairstyle, her overall look and I started to notice a haute attitude that grew and became snobby to say the least. Lets remember she went from a junior reporter to the class act and almost the top paid female on FOX in a very short time. Her rating were beating O'Reily on a regular basis.

As I undertand she jumped ship and I think the reason is her ego which by then was huge. I think FOX offered her $25M, but she took $23 and some opportunity for bigger with ratings etc.

She was banking on ME to follow her over to NBC [I use ME to describe her collective fan base). Well why would I go to NBC and its fake news and junk when I have FOX and she is just a 1 hr show. SO no not following her and in order for her to create an all NEW fan base she needs to swing hard and very far left, otherwise she is just another pretty face for an hour or so.

Then there was the Trump debacle! She did not like him and it showed, she was banking on him not winning, but he did and it got so ugly that Trump cut her out of the game and that was a major hit her not being able to bring Trump news.

Loss of fanbase when she left, loss of Trump support, ego of going from $60k to $12M in only a few years, jumping into a far left pond...can she recover?????????
 
#33 ·
What goes around... COMES around and despite a person's belief or lack of, we can not escape or evade the laws of karma.
I've also heard that in her new position there are some that aren't warm, welcoming and friendly to her arrival. One noted personality was said to have commented that
"she can't come here and start changing things around to suit her fancy, after all I've been here for more than 20 years and she'll be gone before she messes with me..."

It should be interesting to watch things unfold...
 
#34 ·
Once she left Fox and Friends, she changed. She became obviously ambitious and believed her own hype. I stopped watching her even before she pulled that BS with candidate Trump, believing she could take him down in a debate. She showed her true colors. He was savvy enough to turn the tables. I sincerely hope this escapade relegates her to weather-girl in Albany, or better yet, unemployable.
 
#35 ·
I think Alex Jones is a blowhard schmuck who doesn't deserve the air he breathes, but who is anyone to tell a news (NBC? eh.) organization, whom they can interview? If some of her sponsors wish to pull out, then good riddance.

She is a beautiful woman with smarts to match, but she is no journalist. She demonstrated as much with her "coverage" of Trump. Of course, this now qualifies her to report the "hard news" by NBC standards.

I'm glad that Megyn Kelly-Kendall-Brunt is gone from FNC, for the same reasons already articulated in this thread, but it would have been better for all concerned if it had been a clean break. She could have used that lawyer talent to exit the front door quietly, and still with the Roger Ailes harassment check.
 
#39 ·
No time for Megan Kelly. Have not watched her since the Presidential debates. Don't plan to watch her in the future.

I have little interest in watching these dolled up females who want to wear the skirts so high that they have to keep pulling their dresses back down to cover up the ol' cooter and pretend they're trying to hide it and keep pressing their legs tight together to remove all doubt of what particular religion they happen to be. It's all become soft porn tv instead of actual news programming. Sorry, if I happen to have the tv on, it will not be to watch that, regardless of the current (pasted and painted) pretty face and hairdoo.
 
#52 ·
Just noticed this guy's news channel.

I saw one of his more recent news stories and it was a fantastic summary of what is going on. But it had a bad word in it, so I found this other story he did about Megyn which is a few months old now, but still pretty spot on.

If you are looking for another independant news source, this guy's channel might be worth checking out.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7LRhSuuXXVo