If we had a nuclear war or if we're attacked by terrorists it's quite obvious cities such as New York and Washington D.C. would be at great risk. Thankfully we've never had a nuclear war (unless you want to consider WWII a nuclear war when nukes were used in Japan although I don't consider it a full scale nuclear war since it was only two nukes that were used at the very end of the war and it was only the allied forces that were using nukes, namely the USA, not the axis) but we did have a terrorist attack in 2001 when the World Trade Center was hit as well as the Pentagon and apparently the Capital building was also targeted but thankfully it was stopped by passengers and the plane instead crashed into a field near Shanksville, PA.
So it's well known that if the USA is attacked cities such as NYC and D.C. would be targeted but Im concerned about some of the major cities in the south, if they would be targeted and how high the threat level would be. Cities such as Atlanta, Charlotte, New Orleans. Should we be more concerned for the safety of such cities?
So it's well known that if the USA is attacked cities such as NYC and D.C. would be targeted but Im concerned about some of the major cities in the south, if they would be targeted and how high the threat level would be. Cities such as Atlanta, Charlotte, New Orleans. Should we be more concerned for the safety of such cities?