Survivalist Forum banner

Fallacy of stocking up on Milsurp Ammo

6.8K views 14 replies 14 participants last post by  Thesenator223  
#1 ·
While I personally stock up on milsurp ammo I keep in mind that the production quality can vary and other factors such as storage conditions and age can affect the "quality of the ammo". In fact some some milsurp I buy for the components and may and have brokern down some for that purpose.
Some ammo such as 7.62x39 I do buy for the purpose of "battle ammo/defense" since minute of thug accuracy is not as important within the fence as volume of fire may be.
Since I hand load most of my defensive ammo I have loaded to the gun. Meaning that I have worked up the best loading I can for accuracy and even in some case effect like soft point bullets instead of full metal jacket. I cringe when hearing someone has gotten a nice $1000+ semi-auto military style rifle and stocks up on questionable third world military surplus ammo to hold of the muntant hoards. Yes! you can sometimes find milsurp ammo 100 rounds or more for less than a box of 20. I buy 100 rounds of 8mm mauser for way less than a box of commercial. Many times I break it down save the bullets and powder weight the bullets and group by weight and load up with commercial brass, primers and powder. The functioning and accuracy improvements in my SAFN-49 and GEW-43 are noticable not to mention the cleanup.
Sure I understand the need to have a base stock of ammo and the quickest way to stock up affordable ammo for the bargain Mosin-Nagant is to get milsurp. One should consider getting some quality ammo and start building up.
I have a lot of white box 9x19 ammo but the Kel-tec SUB 2000 and Berretta 92 and 99 I have the magazines are loaded up with Hornady. I do use the white box in the Lugers I have as they really function better with FMJ.
Keep in mind quality in is quality out.
 
#2 ·
Hey FD,

I hear you loud and clear regarding expensive rifles and surplus ammo. I agree on principle, with an added thought.

Surplus ammo bought in "lots" may be quite consistent within that lot. As an example, I'll mention the South African 7.62. I've not had any problems with it at all, and it is surprisingly accurate. Both lots of mine are from 1981. R1M1 - 81. Relatively clean (considering....), goes bang when I want it to, and groups well. I tested with a bit of it, and bought more.

If a guy can find some surplus of an agreeable price, and test it for its most important aspects, then I believe he should get more. I bought mine at a good price. Now, I will reload using known components on hand, since the SA is berdan, but for go-to ammo, I'm perfectly comfortable with it.
 
#3 ·
Hmmmm....

The Greeks made 30-06 ammo for decades after WWII. Their HXP mil surp is supposed to be some of the highest quality 30-06 out there.

The Russians INVENTED the 5.45X39 round and their mil surp, albeit from the 1970's and 1980's, is considered to be some of the best 5.45 ammo ever made.

I could go on and on.

Of course not all "mil surp" is the same.

But for the most part, mil surp means quality. Youll always find an exception to that, but for the most part, mil surp is generally the best quality.

I would be more afraid of running no name, or WOLF brand ammo than mil surp.
 
#4 ·
That's what I always understood to be true as well. That milsurp was higher quality ammo than commercial stuff. I believe that it is. It's just cheap. South African and German surplus .308(7.62 NATO) outshoots any of the commercial stuff. Greek 30-06 is awesome, far better quality than "discount" commercial stuff. Cheaper, too. 7.62X54R surplus seems to be of excellent quality,regardless of country of origin. And Romanian 7.62 Tokarev is dirt cheap, and more accurate than Wolf in any of my weapons that shoot 762 tok. Wolf is the only company that makes a JHP for the Tokarev though...that's an impressive round. But Wolf 7.62X39 is essentially milsurp ammo. Just boxed up with non-corrosive primers for the civilian market. Same with Brown Bear, Silver Bear and Hotshot and Golden Tiger. It's all just current production military stuff. But without the corrosive primers, it's shelf life is halved.
 
#5 ·
I have never had any problems with Wolf.
I have had nothing but problems with Indian surplus.
I have also shot enough domestic factory ammo to have had small issues with every major brand.
I check all ammo before it is stored.
The only questionable ammo I ever get is the Eastern Bloc x54R but I use it up fairly fast.
My .308s get RECENT production Lake City, South African or reloads from a reliable local vendor. Even then the local ammo is for practice only.
My 1919 gets HXP.
My ARs and SU-16 get Wolf or Federal ammo.
 
#11 · (Edited)
Only milsurp I ever had any trouble with was a mixed bag of cruddy looking .303 British I found at sa gunshop and some unnamed but real cheap 7.62x25 I got from Sportsmans Guide. The former would hangfire while the later had some split case necks when I inspected it.

I'll add that most NATO spec or Commonwealth ammo is good to go.
 
#14 ·
I've had minor issues with SA milsurp ammo in an M1A, one battle pack presented me with three dud cartridges, not bad considering it was 20 years old and that was the only problem.

I agree with FD on the points made about bullet selection. Easily 95% of what I shoot are either soft point or cast reloads. I'd rather take the time to reload and know I'm getting quality ammunition.

Factory or surplus ammo is in a sense generic that doesn't mean it's a bad thing, just that the ammo has to be made so that it will work in a variety of different makes and models of guns that chamber that particular cartridge...
Reloading allows one to dial in their ammunition to a specific firearm find the accuracy nodes and produce the best possible ammunition for that particular gun...
 
#15 ·
I read the original post here twice and don't get your point.

Many people are stocking up on milsurp ammo just to have something to shoot later if confiscatory taxes are levied on ammo...something which is being more than discussed across the nation.

As for quality, for the type of shooting that the vast majority of shooters do which is simply plinking, milsurp ammo is usually more than adequate, with some being better than others. In my experience, I've never had a bad lot of milsurp ammo and some of it is going on sixty years old....still sealed in cans and still shoots just fine.

As always, know what you are buying and buy from a reputable source. There is rarely a lot of milsurp being sold that there isn't a range report or a hundred posted on the various gun boards so its pretty hard not to know what you're buying with a few simple inquiries.

Always remember....."These Are the Good Old Days", so buy what you can while you can.....it will never be cheaper.