As more countries start to default on their debt, China is refusing to forgive its loans — creating new tension with the U.S. and its allies.
www.politico.com
In short, G-7 started forgiving loans only after decades of taking advantage of borrowers, but they want China to do the same immediately.
What did G-7 do for decades? They promoted structural adjustment: they required borrowers to de-industrialize and look for faster ways to make money, cut public spending, and increase taxes, so that they would have budget surpluses and prove to creditors that they're credit-worthy, and with that can borrow more money.
The result was continued low economic growth and poverty. That's what happened to countries like the Philippines. In addition, if borrowers had regimes that were friendly to the U.S., then they could borrow more, if not receive combinations of military and financial aid.
In short, what G-7 did, if not the U.S., was weaponize not only loans but even aid. The point wasn't to pay back loans but to have strings attached to loans so that borrowers would be permanently reliant on lenders, which is what the U.S. prefers because the only thing it can do is produce more dollars, as its economic relies essentially on continuous debt creation and spending.
What China is doing is similar to that of commercial banks: require collateral, lend, and call them in.
As more countries start to default on their debt, China is refusing to forgive its loans — creating new tension with the U.S. and its allies.
www.politico.com
In short, G-7 started forgiving loans only after decades of taking advantage of borrowers, but they want China to do the same immediately.
What did G-7 do for decades? They promoted structural adjustment: they required borrowers to de-industrialize and look for faster ways to make money, cut public spending, and increase taxes, so that they would have budget surpluses and prove to creditors that they're credit-worthy, and with that can borrow more money.
The result was continued low economic growth and poverty. That's what happened to countries like the Philippines. In addition, if borrowers had regimes that were friendly to the U.S., then they could borrow more, if not receive combinations of military and financial aid.
In short, what G-7 did, if not the U.S., was weaponize not only loans but even aid. The point wasn't to pay back loans but to have strings attached to loans so that borrowers would be permanently reliant on lenders, which is what the U.S. prefers because the only thing it can do is produce more dollars, as its economic relies essentially on continuous debt creation and spending.
What China is doing is similar to that of commercial banks: require collateral, lend, and call them in.