Survivalist Forum banner
Status
Not open for further replies.

‘In a lot of the world, the clock has hit midnight’: China is calling in loans to dozens of countries from Pakistan to Kenya

11K views 155 replies 48 participants last post by  cannonfoddertfc  
#1 ·

This article describes how China has loaned probably trillions of dollars to a whole bunch of third world countries who are now defaulting. China is not forgiving the debt, which is cratering these countries. The most serious ramification I can think of is war, which often results from poverty and a lack of resources. Unfortunately, Pakistan is one of the countries indebt it to China and about to default and they are a nuclear power. The most likely outcome is that the IMF and America will step in and hemorrhage money to prop these countries up. This will result in the hollowing out of the dollar, which is probably China's plan. I would say it's safe to assume that the world is headed in the wrong direction right now.
 
#41 ·
The Chinese always seduce countries with their 'generosity'.
With reasonable terms, nothing too odorous for the 3rd world.
Except not many of them can read Chinese small print.
The only thing that makes sense to me is this is nothing about loans, but a calculated plan (together with the Middle East) to finish off the USD and drag down any country that is dependent on the US.
 
#4 ·
Will,

China admitted (non-publicly) their failure in both Hambantota Port, Sri Lanka and Gwadar, Pakistan.

I see the big catalist as being China no longs wants / needs Iranian oil and gas (via transhipment port of Gwadar, Pakistan since China does not trust future of Iran concurrent with well-priced availability of Russian oil and gas....thenks to the EU/US sanctions helping Ru (and thus China) make it all a windfall win-win-win situation.
 
#6 ·
China seems to be using economics as a weapon of war, and succeeding. They've been doing similarly in Latin America. It would seem that what they can't take through direct aggression, they're buying as loan sharks. China owns a great deal in the US as well, including agricultural land and food processing plants. I don't see the US propping up these poor countries though. Not unless there's a hefty political gain in it.
 
#12 ·
China- you can pay us in resources.
Every country except us- OK
USA- what resources?
 
  • Like
Reactions: CRABBY and 3299
Save
#17 ·
No doubt the USA is overextended these days but china is NO DIFFERENT:


If the entire thrid world tells china to pound sand what are they going to do? Invade 20 plus nations simultaniously? Not to mention many of these countries go through leaders/administrations faster than I do chewing gum and I have a hunch MANY of the new regimes are NOT going to honor "old deals" made by the ousted "oppressor" of the prior regime.
 
#22 ·
I've posted several times in various threads here the concerns I have with China's influence in East Africa. They built the SGR all the way from the Port of Mombasa, Kenya through Nairobi all the way to Entebbe, Uganda. They rebuilt the major "A" highways throughout the country. The majority with Chinese labor, not Kenyan or Ugandan.
 
#32 ·
I've posted several times ...the concerns I have with China's influence in East Africa. They built the SGR all the way... They rebuilt the major "A" highways throughout the country. The majority with Chinese labor...
Not to worry - All the overpasses & bridges are probably Chinese Concrete, too.. :eek: :geek: :rolleyes:

Just like 'General Chi' proposed all those years ago: The Secret Speech of General Chi Haotian :mad: We Are in a 'boiling the frog' state of war (non direct-Military-confrontation / long-game tactics, etc) with the CCP - it just hasn't reached 'terminal velocity'.. Yet. o_O They Are 'carrying out' Many of the 'alt-war ideas' Chi, there, outlined / proposed (ie: Biowarfare, anyone? :mad:

Where's Bond when you need 'im, Oi.. :rolleyes: Too bad it ain't 'that simple', eh?

.02
jd
 
#24 ·
King O sold an awful lot of T Bills to China..Its how he financed all the O Phones and other social program give-a-ways he was so fond of( see phones above🙄)along w Saudi Arabia( they hold so much of our paper its not conceivable by the average wage earner)
Brandon continued the trend and now a lot of those folks want/need their money…Thats why this debt ceiling thing has our ‘leaders’ so cranked up…we have to borrow more money to give them plus pay out all our other debts like Social Security and social programs🤦‍♂️
Get ready for a ride-you wont need spurs👀
 
#28 ·
debt on an international scale doesn't work that way. the risk is that countries tell china to pound sand. and the last thing you are going to want to do if you are being threatened with a default is to give your debtor military leverage over you on your own soil.
 
#31 ·
#33 ·
Don't forget, it's not just African countries that rely on Chinese assistance - most Caribbean Island States now rely on and are beholden to China. When CCP builds bases
throughout the Caribbean, it will make 1962 Cuba look like a walk in Central Park.

Attack us? No, China needs our farmland. But they will, um, remind us who our Masters are.
 
#38 ·
Unfortunately, Pakistan is one of the countries indebt it to China and about to default and they are a nuclear power.
China rolled over our debt.

But of course that won't be reported in the US media.

Where's Rigel ?
Everywhere and nowhere.

He basically told me I'm full of **** when i called him out on commie belt and road .
 
#40 ·
Whatever is happening to us isn't because of China... this article is trying to make it seem that way, but I live here and I know exactly whose fault it is.

BTW I posted this on another thread:


May 21st marks the 72nd anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations between the People’s Republic of China and the Islamic Republic of Pakistan. It is high time to celebrate. A thousand-mile journey begins with the very first step. Nurtured by successive generations of leadership of our two great nations ever since 1951, the China-Pakistani relationship has grown into a time-tested, long-standing and all-weather strategic cooperative partnership.

 
#43 ·
I could tell planes were landing and taking off at our airbases at a furious rate. Every few days, over a million doses arrived.

We had one of the lowest death rates of Covid.

India, next door, had the highest... because they kept waiting for the Pfizer/Moderna vaccine which arrived a lot later. 5 million killed (unofficially it was more like 10 million).

I kept seeing these huge planes all over the sky bringing in vaccines every day.

 
#44 ·
I just read half of the article and scanned through the second half. It sounds like a real disaster.

I don't know if it could lead to war somehow. But it's creepy to think there could be all these countries around the world on the verge of ruin, and people sort of didn't notice it.

Image


Remember the horror movie The Cube?

Like what if there could be a horror that was just the result of bad planning, or even lack of planning?
 
#50 ·
It sounds like a real disaster.......all these countries around the world on the verge of ruin, and people sort of didn't notice it.
This article is popping up everywhere and was timed to appear when the G7 thing was happening.

It is deliberately trying to evoke a sense of anxiety and foreboding.

Pffft.
 
#46 ·

In short, G-7 started forgiving loans only after decades of taking advantage of borrowers, but they want China to do the same immediately.

What did G-7 do for decades? They promoted structural adjustment: they required borrowers to de-industrialize and look for faster ways to make money, cut public spending, and increase taxes, so that they would have budget surpluses and prove to creditors that they're credit-worthy, and with that can borrow more money.

The result was continued low economic growth and poverty. That's what happened to countries like the Philippines. In addition, if borrowers had regimes that were friendly to the U.S., then they could borrow more, if not receive combinations of military and financial aid.

In short, what G-7 did, if not the U.S., was weaponize not only loans but even aid. The point wasn't to pay back loans but to have strings attached to loans so that borrowers would be permanently reliant on lenders, which is what the U.S. prefers because the only thing it can do is produce more dollars, as its economic relies essentially on continuous debt creation and spending.

What China is doing is similar to that of commercial banks: require collateral, lend, and call them in.



In short, G-7 started forgiving loans only after decades of taking advantage of borrowers, but they want China to do the same immediately.

What did G-7 do for decades? They promoted structural adjustment: they required borrowers to de-industrialize and look for faster ways to make money, cut public spending, and increase taxes, so that they would have budget surpluses and prove to creditors that they're credit-worthy, and with that can borrow more money.

The result was continued low economic growth and poverty. That's what happened to countries like the Philippines. In addition, if borrowers had regimes that were friendly to the U.S., then they could borrow more, if not receive combinations of military and financial aid.

In short, what G-7 did, if not the U.S., was weaponize not only loans but even aid. The point wasn't to pay back loans but to have strings attached to loans so that borrowers would be permanently reliant on lenders, which is what the U.S. prefers because the only thing it can do is produce more dollars, as its economic relies essentially on continuous debt creation and spending.

What China is doing is similar to that of commercial banks: require collateral, lend, and call them in.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
You have insufficient privileges to reply here.