Survivalist Forum banner
Cancel

With the sunset of the AWB?

2414 Views 15 Replies 12 Participants Last post by  mtncharlie, 
W
With the sunset of the Assault Weapons Ban is it 'legal' to change out thumb hole stocks and add things like flash suppressors to weapons that were made during the ban?
Reply
Save
Like
1 - 16 of 16 Posts
InIt2Live
Well my guess is you are talking about a Mak 90? You are allowed to change/add these things as long as you still follow the 922r compliance. You have to change a certain amount of parts, in order to be left with only a certain number of imported parts to make it all legal. Here is a website I have used...

http://milsurpstuff.com/922r%20Compliance%20Info.htm
Reply
Save
Like
sailinghudson25
Remember to abide by state, county ,and local laws.

If it's an import gun, then you have to follow 922r. If it is made in the USA, then you can do what you want with it.
Reply
Save
Like
  • Like
Reactions: 1
MikeK
As long as you don't break any local laws and you abide by 922r, you're good. In fact I recommend making any changes like that as soon as possible. There may be another, similar ban come along, and it would be nice if all of our "post ban" guns were considered "pre ban" again. Silly cosmetic bans anyway.
Reply
Save
Like
American ME!
MikeK said:
As long as you don't break any local laws and you abide by 922r, you're good. In fact I recommend making any changes like that as soon as possible. There may be another, similar ban come along, and it would be nice if all of our "post ban" guns were considered "pre ban" again. Silly cosmetic bans anyway.
Click to expand...
ANY of this is a direct and blatant infringement of the 2nd Amendment that the framers said SHALL NOT to.

My $0.02 worth.
Reply
Save
Like
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Hard Hittin 54r
They all need ot leave us the hell alone.

HH54r
Reply
Save
Like
  • Like
Reactions: 3
American ME!
Hard Hittin 54r said:
They all need ot leave us the hell alone.

HH54r
Click to expand...
That's a big ROGER on that one bro! And THEN some!:thumb::cool::mad:
Reply
Save
Like
  • Like
Reactions: 1
MIL-DOT
American ME! said:
ANY of this is a direct and blatant infringement of the 2nd Amendment that the framers said SHALL NOT to.

My $0.02 worth.
Click to expand...

While you are most definately correct, and I agree completely, this would still be small consolation while doing push-ups in cell block D ;).
Reply
Save
Like
SgtBooker44
Double check your local and state laws.
Reply
Save
Like
  • Like
Reactions: 2
K
^^What he said.
Reply
Save
Like
American ME!
MIL-DOT said:
While you are most definately correct, and I agree completely, this would still be small consolation while doing push-ups in cell block D ;).
Click to expand...
Who say's we are going to cell block D? NO way!:mad: NO how!:mad:
Reply
Save
Like
MikeK
American ME! said:
ANY of this is a direct and blatant infringement of the 2nd Amendment that the framers said SHALL NOT to.

My $0.02 worth.
Click to expand...
Agreed, but that doesn't stop them from doing it. Being in prison over a 922r violation is no way to fight for our freedoms. I hate it too, but I abide by it...for now.
Reply
Save
Like
sailinghudson25
There is nothing worng about putting new parts of a 40 year old gun. US made trigger make them shoot better. Better quality gas pistons and tubes. New parts on your magazines.

It's almost like they require you to make you gun more reliable. If you think of it that way, they backfired on that law.

That law opened up a whole window on parts manufacture. If it was for that law, there'd be a lot less SKS and AK goodies out there.
Reply
Save
Like
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Sampson1986
American ME! said:
ANY of this is a direct and blatant infringement of the 2nd Amendment that the framers said SHALL NOT to.

My $0.02 worth.
Click to expand...
I agree with you 110%, bud.

Unfortunately for us, big government bureaucrats don't give a **** about any of the constitutional amendments (except for the one that allows them to tax us :rolleyes:).
Reply
Save
Like
  • Like
Reactions: 2
D
sailinghudson25 said:
There is nothing worng about putting new parts of a 40 year old gun. US made trigger make them shoot better. Better quality gas pistons and tubes. New parts on your magazines.

It's almost like they require you to make you gun more reliable. If you think of it that way, they backfired on that law.

That law opened up a whole window on parts manufacture. If it was for that law, there'd be a lot less SKS and AK goodies out there.
Click to expand...
That is a good way of looking at it.
Reply
Save
Like
mtncharlie
MIL-DOT said:
While you are most definately correct, and I agree completely, this would still be small consolation while doing push-ups in cell block D ;).
Click to expand...
That would more likely be Stalag B! It's time the PEOPLE let the ELITE know "We're mad as HELL, and we aren't gonna take it anymore"!!!!!!
Reply
Save
Like
1 - 16 of 16 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Survivalist Forum
A forum community dedicated to survivalists and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about collections, gear, DIY projects, hobbies, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more!
Full Forum Listing
Explore Our Forums
Off Topic Lounge Disaster Preparedness General Discussion Firearms General Discussion New Member Introductions Wilderness Survival, Hiking and Camping Forum
Top