Survivalist Forum banner
1 - 20 of 62 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
15,150 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Anyone that has been around weapons for any amount of time knows all to well who sarah brady is .... well here is an article that says a great deal about her and her thugs over there in bubble land of bliss...

Why I say Sarah Brady Lies!

Excerpts from a speech by Sarah Brady, delivered to general public on October 13, 1994, at the Thompson Conference Center, at the University of Texas, Austin, TX., juxtaposed with other comments Sarah Brady has publicly made.

"The one thing that I have pushed for has been responsible gun ownership; responsible and keeping guns out of the wrong hands. We are not for disarming people in this nation at all, that is the furthest thing from our minds, but what we are is for saving lives. Now I am known as the Number One Gun Grabber in this country. I don't want to grab anyone's guns. I can assure you, but what I do want to do is make things safer." [emphasis added]

"We must get rid of all the guns."
--Sarah Brady, speaking on behalf of Handgun Control Inc
Phil Donahue Show, September 1994
--- with Sheriff Jay Printz & others
Note: In Texas, just one month later she denies
that she wants to "get rid of all the guns".


"...I don't believe gun owners have rights."
Sarah Brady, Chairman, Handgun Control, Incorporated, from the Hearst Newspapers Special Report, "Handguns in America" October 1997)

Just remember, Sarah doesn't consider this view extremist.
I always thought that every person in the U.S. had rights.
That's what I was taught in school and that's what the Constitution says and
the courts. I'd never deprive a person of their right to speak their mind, not
even Sarah Brady. But she feels some people don't deserve to have rights.
Reminds me of a problem that occurred 50 years ago with Germany's Jews.

"No one can consider themselves immune from the terrible epidemic that claims more than 15 people a day, 15 children a day, excuse me, more than a hundred Americans a day."

Sarah likes to claim 40,000 people are being gunned down yearly but
she knows full well that deaths from suicide account for nearly half of
that number (about 18,346 in 1994). Without trying to downplay the
tragedy of suicide, no law could adequately prevent someone from taking
their own life. Also, since Canada imposed heavy restrictions on handguns
the suicide rate has remained about the same. People simply changed from
gun suicides to leaping suicides.

But then, one hundred people per day makes for a nice sound-byte, doesn't it?


sarah brady: In the first month alone more than 23,000 felons were stopped from buying handguns over the counter, many included murders and rapists and this is according to the ATF.

truth is: According to a Government Accounting Office audit, only 12 people
have been prosecuted under the Brady law.
The GAO also found that
most of the rejections under Brady were due to errors in filling out the
form or other clerical issues having nothing to do with stopping felons.

sarah brady: [People] want [a gun] for self protection but have no clue how to use it, how to keep it safely from kids, and in that situation, that gun is 43 times more likely to be misused than it ever is to be used effectively in protecting ones' self. That statistic comes from the New England Journal of Medicine. It has been researched over the years that a gun in the home is much more a danger to the owner.

truth is: Sarah likes to use this "43 times" statistic, even though the author of the study admits that his study was flawed and, at best, the number should be closer to 2.7 times. But the true story is in how the study evaluated data.

Remarkably, the author excluded all other legitimate uses, including occasions
where a gun was used a gun for protection but a shot was never fired or a
criminal simply wounded or frightened away. This is equivalent to claiming
airplanes are an public danger due to the number of yearly deaths without
accounting for the number of passengers or miles safely flown!

http://hematite.com/dragon/bradylies.html

This is why I have been telling people that what comes out of her mouth is and nearly always blatant lies and twisting of facts and real data... the key to defeating them and exposing them for what they do is always about education.... lots of it, because these people will do anything to take away yor gun rights and all of your weapons... one way or another...

She has also fabricated in her ignorance that the gun that hassan used was a cop killer gun.... Now that one is a gun i would like to see... never have seen a cop killer gun...
 

·
American fearmaker
Joined
·
14,248 Posts
Just a note for your thread.

Did you know that good ol' Sarah actually did a strawman purchase of a sniper-- er-- high powered hunting rifle for her son?

Did you know that in Virginia Sarah is known to carry a concealed handgun in her purse and that she has a concealed weapons permit?

Can all of you boys and girls say the word "hypocrite?" As in, "Sarah Brady is a huge hypocrite."
 

·
Where the Elite meet
Joined
·
5,560 Posts
Just a note for your thread.

Did you know that good ol' Sarah actually did a strawman purchase of a sniper-- er-- high powered hunting rifle for her son?

Did you know that in Virginia Sarah is known to carry a concealed handgun in her purse and that she has a concealed weapons permit?

Can all of you boys and girls say the word "hypocrite?" As in, "Sarah Brady is a huge hypocrite."
That's interesting. Do you have a link for more info?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
15,150 Posts
Discussion Starter · #7 ·
Just a note for your thread.

Did you know that good ol' Sarah actually did a strawman purchase of a sniper-- er-- high powered hunting rifle for her son?

Did you know that in Virginia Sarah is known to carry a concealed handgun in her purse and that she has a concealed weapons permit?

Can all of you boys and girls say the word "hypocrite?" As in, "Sarah Brady is a huge hypocrite."


Oh yea, I hear about that a while back.... the lady (if she can be called that ) has more guts than some people I know of... But aside from that she is a crook and a liar as well as a hypocrite... gotta love it when she falls on her butt...

she also claimed she bought a 30 -06 for her son at a gun show or something... back in 2000 or something like 2002, but the NRA and several other outfits shot her in the butt over her lie... there was no particulr gun show in the city she was claiming at that time... she seems to think there is a gun show loophole.... there is not and she in her ignorance is scared of guns and gun rights...she also seemed to have forgotten where she bought it... some where in deleware she claimed.. and she was nailed over he intentional so called straw purchase of that weapon with illegal intent... but the broad is a brady and no one ever filed law suit over it and no one pressed charges on her...

I spent about a year in the gun rights fight arena and I took alot of her people apart on the open floor of debate.... I learned alot and I have never really understood those that think we do not need a gun.
 

·
American fearmaker
Joined
·
14,248 Posts
I learned alot and I have never really understood those that think we do not need a gun.

It's not about whether or not you need or want a gun. It is all about control and power. Nothing more. If they can control (deny you) any guns then these liberal anti-gun nuts feel like they have power over all other people. It boosts their egos and they wrongly feel like their controlled minions worship them, the anti-gunners. A liberal/socialist/Democrat will take up any screwball cause that they feel will boost their ego, even if it is proven to be 100% wrong. If you can name a cause that is immoral, wrong or illegal then it will have liberal/socialist/Democrats behind it. I often think that people who are liberals have some sort of mental illness that they have yet to identify and cure.

Just google Sarah Brady and strawman sales in this forum's search engine and you'll soon have your sites that you need or want. There are just so many sites out there about Sarah buying her son a high powered rifle and her having a concealed carry permit.

http://www.hoffmang.com/archives/2002_03.html

http://freeliberal.com/archives/000780.php

http://www.strike-the-root.com/3/terry/terry2.html

I'm still looking for the sites involving Sarah having a Virginia concealed weapons permit.
 

·
Where the Elite meet
Joined
·
5,560 Posts
It seems that she openly admits to buying a rifle for her son. If anything it shows that even people against gun violence can see the difference between gun violence and hunting. She should be congratulated for this, not condemned.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
15,150 Posts
Discussion Starter · #12 ·
Probable illegal purchase? It hasn't been verified?

Mrs. Brady "bought her son a powerful rifle for Christmas in 2000 - and may have skirted Delaware state background-check requirements," the New York Daily News reported Thursday.

Some people will do anything to tell a book. No doubt to increase interest in what otherwise would be a boring memoir, the gun rights opponent writes that she bought James Brady Jr. a Remington .30-06, "complete with scope and safety lock," at a gun shop in Lewes, Del.


"I can't describe how I felt when I picked up that rifle, loaded it into my little car and drove home," she writes. "It seemed so incredibly strange: Sarah Brady, of all people, packing heat."


According to her book, the store ran federal Brady Law and state background checks with much ado. But the book suggests she did not have her son checked, as required by Delaware law.


Delaware Justice Department spokeswoman Lori Sitler said the purchase could be illegal if Mrs. Brady did not say who she was buying the gun for and submit his "name, rank and serial number" for an inquiry.

"You can't purchase a gun for someone else," Sitler told the Daily News. "That would be a 'straw purchase.' You've got a problem right there."


Gun rights advocates were surprised to hear of Mrs. Brady's antics.


"We hope that it's innocuous and there's been no laws violated," said James Jay Baker, chief lobbyist for National Rifle Association. "It's obviously interesting that Sarah would be purchasing firearms of any kind for anybody, given her championing of restrictive guns laws for everyone."

Seniors United Supporting the Second Amendment told NewsMax.com it was asking Delaware and the U.S. Department of Justice to investigate "what appears to be a criminal act" by Mrs. Brady.

"Sarah Brady is infamous for her radical anti-Second Amendment positions and her work to strip the citizens if the United States of their civil rights. She is the head of an extremist group that is working to gut the Bill of Rights," the group said in a statement.

"Sarah Brady is typical of the anti-civil rights radicals," noted John Bender, executive director of SUSSA. "She wants to ban private transfers of guns for everyone but her and her elitist friends. If a black mother in a Delaware public housing apartment did this she would already be charged with a crime. I’m wondering if Delaware has different enforcement standards for rich white women.”

The group concluded: "Sarah Brady is one of the leaders in the anti-civil rights movement’s attempt to make all private transfers of firearms illegal. Along with other extremists she pushed Congress to make this type of straw purchase illegal. Law enforcement should show her what her work has accomplished."

Mrs. Brady became a media-adored opponent of the Second Amendment after her husband, James, White House press secretary to President Ronald Reagan, was shot in a 1981 assassination attempt on Reagan.


This was originally published in Newsmax magazine back in 2000 or so, but it (the article) is no longer in their archives...

Had I been looking into this ..I would have charged her for illegal purchase of a weapon..... she bought it for her son, and he did not do a background check in that state, and that is a violation of criminal law...
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
15,150 Posts
Discussion Starter · #14 ·
It seems that she openly admits to buying a rifle for her son. If anything it shows that even people against gun violence can see the difference between gun violence and hunting. She should be congratulated for this, not condemned.

sure she bought the gun... but the issue is clear... she purchased it for someone else and not herself.... that is a crime in deleware and in violation of the brady back ground check law she and her hubby got in place...

The other thing is while she did purchase it for her son...she did it in an illegal manner... that you cannot do.

Any weapon that is purchased from a store has to go through her wonderful legal aspects... and she violated that very law...
 

·
Where the Elite meet
Joined
·
5,560 Posts
sure she bought the gun... but the issue is clear... she purchased it for someone else and not herself.... that is a crime in deleware and in violation of the brady back ground check law she and her hubby got in place...

The other thing is while she did purchase it for her son...she did it in an illegal manner... that you cannot do.

Any weapon that is purchased from a store has to go through her wonderful legal aspects... and she violated that very law...
Sadly there is no proof either way. The only thing for sure that we have learned from this is that Sarah Brady isn't anti-gun. :thumb:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
15,150 Posts
Discussion Starter · #16 ·
Sadly there is no proof either way. The only thing for sure that we have learned from this is that Sarah Brady isn't anti-gun. :thumb:

that and that she purchased a weapon (her own words) for her son and bought it in a store and did so under her name...in violation of deleware law... that is the crux of what she did....

why no one followed into an investigation of her actions to me is pretty clear... she is basically above the law.... and that seems to be happening all over the place...

Now if you did this... they would be on you so fast it would stink.... why? because you are not a high profile person of some so called importance... you are the run of the mill person and that makes you .... a criminal in their book. But not her.
 

·
Where the Elite meet
Joined
·
5,560 Posts
that and that she purchased a weapon (her own words) for her son and bought it in a store and did so under her name...in violation of deleware law... that is the crux of what she did....

why no one followed into an investigation of her actions to me is pretty clear... she is basically above the law.... and that seems to be happening all over the place...

Now if you did this... they would be on you so fast it would stink.... why? because you are not a high profile person of some so called importance... you are the run of the mill person and that makes you .... a criminal in their book. But not her.
Hey, at least she's pro-gun! :thumb:
 

·
Salad Shooter
Joined
·
300 Posts
She is sure not anti-gun; she bought one for her son. You can be against gun violence without being against guns. They aren't mutually exclusive.
"We must get rid of all the guns."
--Sarah Brady, speaking on behalf of Handgun Control Inc
Phil Donahue Show, September 1994

That sounds pretty darn anti-gun to me.

I guess we could say she isn't Anti-"her family having guns", but she is certainly Anti-"regular folks having guns".
 
1 - 20 of 62 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top