Survivalist Forum banner
21 - 40 of 50 Posts
If the voters and the decent people there in that **** hole of a place condone and allow this type of thing to be there and have made little to no effort to kill (literally)... then they are as guilty as the ones doing and allowing it all....

Nuke it!!!!
 
If the voters and the decent people there in that **** hole of a place condone and allow this type of thing to be there and have made little to no effort to kill (literally)... then they are as guilty as the ones doing and allowing it all....

Nuke it!!!!
The decent people in NY do not condone this type of thing to be here. Nuke my country!? I really hope emotion got the better of you. I usually find your input refreshing. This isn't one of those times.:confused:

The good in NY are however, outnumbered by scumbags.
 
While in this case, he was viewing it purposely I believe.

Make sure you always clear your cache, and defrag.

Why you ask?

Because within your internet cache you might have pornography you didn't set out to view, or even actually see.

I actually find it pretty interesting that the Judges comprehended that the cache is a lot different than active downloading.
 
The decent people in NY do not condone this type of thing to be here. Nuke my country!? I really hope emotion got the better of you. I usually find your input refreshing. This isn't one of those times.:confused:

The good in NY are however, outnumbered by scumbags.


then get your ass organized and take the ****ing mess back by force... because either people start fightong back and using force if needed and get what is yours back......or clearly lose it all.

if the excuse of we are outnumbered is all there is then the good people ought to let the friggin mess sink or burn down... because that is what will happen to the city...It was a good city and it tanked about 30 years back and no ne there has done enough to take it back and to restore it to what it was..... so i do not except excuses for the behavior of rotten animals that want it nor the people that condone it... sorry man, but it stinks of apathy... and apathy has killed and is doing it right now...

The other thing is this... guarnetee the scum in the city the sohrtest trials in judicial history and kill em off..... you peoples choice..... live with it or get rid of it....

don't hand me the age old excuse of the courts or the politicals.... their day is indeed nearly here.... and please don't be confused... fight for it or lose it!!!
 
Just goes to show that what's "legal" doesn't mean it's right.
Say you get linked to a site, you click on it. Your precaching then caches a bunch of links off that site. One of the next sites has child pornography.

You now have child pornography in your cache.

See how this works now?

You might never have viewed it, never have even known it was there. But now, in your cache, whamo there's a file of repulsiveness there.
 
There must be a legal distinction between having this crap on your PC unknowingly, and having it deliberately.

How you determine that is a computer experts job, not a court imo.

I think the court got this one right if you read between the lines. The guy is still a dirtbag, but it sounds like the court made the smart decision on some of the evidence.
 
The real problem, imo, is the makers and distributors of child sexual abuse 'products' (I cannot think of a decent word for this work of the human devils who make it); it's so difficult to believe that in this day and age SOME sort of filter or something cannot be developed to stop the spread of this tragedy.
 
The real problem, imo, is the makers and distributors of child sexual abuse 'products' (I cannot think of a decent word for this work of the human devils who make it); it's so difficult to believe that in this day and age SOME sort of filter or something cannot be developed to stop the spread of this tragedy.


don't know about filters, but deal with the vermin... one bullet right between the eyes every time on of them is caught doing this , or selling it, or posting it.... after awhile the vermin start not wanting to do this, and if they think they can get away.... make sure they don't...

make the penalty for it so harsh that they won't want to be any part of it...
 
don't know about filters, but deal with the vermin... one bullet right between the eyes every time on of them is caught doing this , or selling it, or posting it.... after awhile the vermin start not wanting to do this, and if they think they can get away.... make sure they don't...

make the penalty for it so harsh that they won't want to be any part of it...
First you have to prove who is vermin.
 
then get your ass organized and take the ****ing mess back by force... because either people start fightong back and using force if needed and get what is yours back......or clearly lose it all.

if the excuse of we are outnumbered is all there is then the good people ought to let the friggin mess sink or burn down... because that is what will happen to the city...It was a good city and it tanked about 30 years back and no ne there has done enough to take it back and to restore it to what it was..... so i do not except excuses for the behavior of rotten animals that want it nor the people that condone it... sorry man, but it stinks of apathy... and apathy has killed and is doing it right now...

The other thing is this... guarnetee the scum in the city the sohrtest trials in judicial history and kill em off..... you peoples choice..... live with it or get rid of it....

don't hand me the age old excuse of the courts or the politicals.... their day is indeed nearly here.... and please don't be confused... fight for it or lose it!!!
It's not my state of residence. I'm just stuck here for work. So, I don't have a say in the politics. I'd rather free 100 Criminals than visit an unjust sentence on the innocent. There are many children here. So they should die too?
Now, I wont hand you the age old excuse of "the courts or the politicals...." as you seem to have a grasp on where the problem lies.
I guess I got a little worked up about the nuke comment. What can I say; I took 9/11 quite personally.
 
this doesnt help pedo freaks at all.it is all about reasonable doubt.that 1 poor ignorant person that stumbles across a pedo web sight but didnt actually download any child porn files.an extreme scenario but could happen i guess.whats more disturbing then this technicality issue is toddlers in tiaras on TLC or dance moms on lifetime...things that every 1 knows is wrong and has strict laws on already is less of a problem then moms promoting there kids as a sex object on tv and using the excuse "its art"....pedophiles are using that excuse too.
 
Say you get linked to a site, you click on it. Your precaching then caches a bunch of links off that site. One of the next sites has child pornography.

You now have child pornography in your cache.

See how this works now?

You might never have viewed it, never have even known it was there. But now, in your cache, whamo there's a file of repulsiveness there.
I agree that that could happen, but it's also a great defense for some sicko-pervert to hide behind to keep his butt out of prison where it should be.
 
First you have to prove who is vermin.

evidence PK... plain old facts and evidence.... they are the vermin..... you have it you are guilty.... you produce this vile crap, you are guilty, you engage it on an international level, you will be hunted down and removed.

That is all it takes..... evidence.

Next thing you can say is all of the what ifs like.... they were set up and it was planted on the computer.....

no excuse of that at all..... If that is the case and it can be proven that someone did that to a person.... then the person that did it gets executed as fast as the others....
 
It's not my state of residence. I'm just stuck here for work. So, I don't have a say in the politics. I'd rather free 100 Criminals than visit an unjust sentence on the innocent. There are many children here. So they should die too?
Now, I wont hand you the age old excuse of "the courts or the politicals...." as you seem to have a grasp on where the problem lies.
I guess I got a little worked up about the nuke comment. What can I say; I took 9/11 quite personally.


So did I!!!! But if people will not deal with it.... then it is their own damn fault and i will never go to that **** hole again..... not that it matters much to anyone, but i have spent alot of money in that city over the years, but i will not do business there any longer...
 
I agree that that could happen, but it's also a great defense for some sicko-pervert to hide behind to keep his butt out of prison where it should be.
Rather have 100 criminals free than 1 innocent in prison.

When you start to give up other people's freedoms for security, you will end up losing your own.
 
Rather have 100 criminals free than 1 innocent in prison.

When you start to give up other people's freedoms for security, you will end up losing your own.

I'd rather have one innocent in prison than 100 criminals on the street if that were the choice. But I think it would be many MANY more than 100 free for every 1 innocent in prison. In my mind, that one gave someone the reason to look at him and make the mistake in the first place so he's not exactly innocent. Like I tell my nieces and nephews, if you want to guarantee you don't get yourself into ANY trouble then don't put yourself in the position to be considered for it in the first place.
 
evidence PK... plain old facts and evidence.... they are the vermin..... you have it you are guilty.... you produce this vile crap, you are guilty, you engage it on an international level, you will be hunted down and removed.

That is all it takes..... evidence.

Next thing you can say is all of the what ifs like.... they were set up and it was planted on the computer.....

no excuse of that at all..... If that is the case and it can be proven that someone did that to a person.... then the person that did it gets executed as fast as the others....
i know how hard it is to think about technicalitys when dealing with such disturbing crimes such as this.just imagine this scenario.your chatting with someone online,they throw up a child porn photo hosted on image shack,your pc says you looked at this image weather u did or not,not downloaded it but just "looked" at it.some how the cops had evidence of this happening and arrest you.now you got a linch mob pointing fingers and movie stars protesting and your all over the news.would you want the law in this artical to still be there to keep you out of prison?or actually keep them from arresting you in the 1rst place getting your mug shot on the news? hopefully that puts it in perspective,only example i could think of atm.

this is all about the difference of something that is just on the web compared to someone procuring it.like standing beside a stolen car parked on the street as opposed to siting inside of it.it really has nothing to do with this sicko they spoke about or his failed defense of "i was framed".that was just used to get the headline so people will read it,that makes them money$
 
I'd rather have one innocent in prison than 100 criminals on the street if that were the choice. But I think it would be many MANY more than 100 free for every 1 in prison. In my mind, that one gave someone the reason to look at him and make the mistake in the first place so he's not exactly innocent. Like I tell my nieces and nephews, if you want to guarantee you don't get yourself into ANY trouble then don't put yourself in the position to be considered for it in the first place.
what if that 1 innocent person in prison is you or your kid?
 
21 - 40 of 50 Posts