Survivalist Forum banner

1 - 20 of 34 Posts

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
9,224 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·

·
Iēsous
Joined
·
8,793 Posts
U.S. Government Report: Mexico May Fail

HM does this rule out Mexican troops invading Texas?

Who's gonna invade us when we collapse?

U.S. Government sees it might come there and cant see 700 billion more in spending will drop the dollar further?

The Gangsters must of Pissed off the Bankers
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,362 Posts
If Mexico Fails this might cause civil unrest which leads to another Mexican revolution.If that happens it may well spill across our border.Its about time for Mexico to have another conflict. The Wars they have fought within there borders over the past two centuries has been every 100 years.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
49 Posts
Well if they invade us right now all I can say is it'll be a target rich enviroment:D:.We as a country are already on edge with everything that is going on I guess mexico would soon become just part of the united states then i could just move to CANCUN:thumb:
 

·
To secure peace is to...
Joined
·
4,194 Posts
All of the friggin' morons that thought we were unkind or mean or whatever for not wanting to secure our borders will regret that in the coming years and this issue may very well bring it to the forefront.

The whole border issue is stupid. Should there even be a question about it? I guess those liberal weiners "feel" it is wrong despite logic and reasoning. My friggin' dogs understand establishing and protecting THEIR territory, it's pretty ridiculous some humans aren't capable of that amount of logic...
 

·
... --- ...
Joined
·
14,874 Posts
I just logged on intending to post the very same link, 'cept I was going to sub-caption it with,"....not that it would be a BAD thing:D:"
 

·
Bail me out
Joined
·
398 Posts
ahh the second step towards the nau.
 

·
Molōn Labe!
Joined
·
673 Posts
Don't laugh about a Mexico falling scenario. Thanks to NORTHCOM's announcement last year of a joint task force agreement with Canadian and Mexican militaries, all 3 will assist each other in "times of necessity". So, you won't have a blue helmet patrolling your street. Instead, it will be a cold Canuck or your amigo Juan patrolling your block in BDUs. All for your safety of course.

And the NAU won't come in until they break the US populace and destroy its currency.

Oh wait... crap.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
38 Posts
I try and keep my posting to a minimum but ...

Friends ask me all the time if we pull out of Iraq wont you feel like you and the soldiers and friends you lost feel like it was all for nothing? I have been thinking very heavily on this question lately. To be honest three full years since my active service has finished, I have finally found the answer that I am looking for. Pulling out of Iraq wont disappoint me what does disappoint me that in the four years (actually three and half including basic training) how ****ty Americans have let this country become while I defended our freedoms and our rights. It saddens me to see police and government officials crap on every freedom I was hoping and looking forward to enjoying when in the service. Every service member knows you give up all rights when going into the armed forces. Now it looks like I have to fight for freedom in the land of the free. I was hoping that America would lock down our borders, not that hard post a ma deuce every 500 meters in a tower the sound alone from the first few bursts will scare anyone off trying to cross illegally. I spent three and a half years on foreign soil defending America and the best that my homeland could do in return to protect itself is get in petty arguments about who is going to put up a cheap ass wire border???? Sorry for the side tangent but protect ourselves and our family's first. I defended America not NAFTA.

Excuse the rant if ya don't like it or how I went of on a tangent heh I wont loose sleep neither should you after all who cares about who is sneaking into your house, or your yard, or your borders.
 

·
WINNING...humbly
Joined
·
3,704 Posts
I am a believer now

"Hopi prophecy also tells us that there will be a mass migration of Indians northward from Mexico and Central and South America. The migration will be led by a 130-year old Indian named Etchata Etchana. The movement will come after the huge fire and explosion that will herald the advent of the True White Brother. "

I have to tell you this is one old SoB this E.E.

http://www.welcomehome.org/rainbow/prophecy/hopi1.html
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
377 Posts
All of the friggin' morons that thought we were unkind or mean or whatever for not wanting to secure our borders will regret that in the coming years and this issue may very well bring it to the forefront.

The whole border issue is stupid. Should there even be a question about it? I guess those liberal weiners "feel" it is wrong despite logic and reasoning. My friggin' dogs understand establishing and protecting THEIR territory, it's pretty ridiculous some humans aren't capable of that amount of logic...
I agree with you completely. The only thing is I know liberals through my work and not one of them want the borders to be open. I don't know who the govrnment is representing when they keep saying that the American people want the borders to be more open. I know my liberal friend don't want that, my conservative friends don't want that. So the only people that I can think that want it are the illegals themselves and big businesses that want the cheap labor. I don't know why ANY politicians would think letting people flood across the borders and take jobs and resources away from us would win them votes.

You're right, some humans aren't as smart as the dogs.:thumb:

blt
 

·
I help enlighten folks
Joined
·
16,624 Posts
I agree with you completely. The only thing is I know liberals through my work and not one of them want the borders to be open. I don't know who the govrnment is representing when they keep saying that the American people want the borders to be more open. I know my liberal friend don't want that, my conservative friends don't want that. So the only people that I can think that want it are the illegals themselves and big businesses that want the cheap labor. I don't know why ANY politicians would think letting people flood across the borders and take jobs and resources away from us would win them votes.

You're right, some humans aren't as smart as the dogs.:thumb:

blt
Most "average" people don't even understand what a liberal is.
They just parrot limbaugh and hannity.
If you don't like entiltlements, don't complain about suggestions of population control for poor people. And if you take the entitlements away don't be surprised if the "jobs" they find are being a criminal.
 

·
Destroyer of Marxism.
Joined
·
875 Posts
Most "average" people don't even understand what a liberal is.
They just parrot limbaugh and hannity.
If you don't like entiltlements, don't complain about suggestions of population control for poor people. And if you take the entitlements away don't be surprised if the "jobs" they find are being a criminal.
Perhaps people do "parrot" Limbaugh and Hannity. However, they merely use common understanding of typical liberals. The granola eating, tree hugging, treasonous bed wetters who squealed "RACIST!!" about those of us who resist efforts made by La Raza, (The Race) to "reconquista" the SW US come to mind.

I don't like "entitlements". No one is entitled to housing, healthcare, food, a car, clothing or cuddly bunnies.
You are entitled to aquire it through work, and judging the efforts of those who risk their lives to get jobs here, there is no excuse not to work unless you have a legitamite handicap. Socialists in our country, commonly known as liberals, have done far more to damage opportunites for good jobs through envirofascism, excessive union benefits that have completely destroyed the steel industry, and have the auto industry on life support. Lets not forget the CRA that forced banks to make loans to people who are "entitled" to free money.

Those who "find" jobs as criminals should be dealt with by an armed population. Yet for some reason "liberals" (not all of them of course) seem to "think" people have no right to defend the property (or even their lives)they managed to aquire in spite of their obligations to the state.

Until we "liberalize" our tax system, and reverse the punishment of industry and progress, we can not expect to see the same successes we had post WW2. Right now we have the second highest corporate tax burdens, and if you factor in state taxes I belive it is the highest. At that point we can once again easily absorb the tired huddled masses yerning to breath free, and shoot the ne'r do wells who sneak in amoungst them.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
1,711 Posts
Perhaps people do "parrot" Limbaugh and Hannity. However, they merely use common understanding of typical liberals. The granola eating, tree hugging, treasonous bed wetters who squealed "RACIST!!" about those of us who resist efforts made by La Raza, (The Race) to "reconquista" the SW US come to mind.

I don't like "entitlements". No one is entitled to housing, healthcare, food, a car, clothing or cuddly bunnies.

If housing didn't cost so damn much, most people wouldn't have a problem buying it. There is no reason rent should be as much as it is, and as for building homes, there are better and cheaper options than stick framing. It should not take 20-30 years to pay for a house. As for healthcare, why should rich people have good health, and the poor be sick and suffer? Doctors become doctors to help people, not worry about how fat they can make their wallet or drive the newest Porche. For the food, we throw away so much in this country no one should go hungry. I would rather see the food be given away than end up in a landfill. For the car, if our cities were designed better, most people would not need a car to get around. It is sprawl and lazy design that contributes to the need for a car. Clothing, see the food excess statement. For cuddly bunnies, I don't really have an answer for that. Even with our economic woes, America is so wealthy, homeless and the poor should be nonexistent.


You are entitled to aquire it through work, and judging the efforts of those who risk their lives to get jobs here, there is no excuse not to work unless you have a legitamite handicap. Socialists in our country, commonly known as liberals, have done far more to damage opportunites for good jobs through envirofascism, excessive union benefits that have completely destroyed the steel industry, and have the auto industry on life support. Lets not forget the CRA that forced banks to make loans to people who are "entitled" to free money.

Socialism and liberalism are two different things. Most people who bash Socialism have no clue what it actually is.

Those who "find" jobs as criminals should be dealt with by an armed population. Yet for some reason "liberals" (not all of them of course) seem to "think" people have no right to defend the property (or even their lives)they managed to aquire in spite of their obligations to the state.

Until we "liberalize" our tax system, and reverse the punishment of industry and progress, we can not expect to see the same successes we had post WW2. Right now we have the second highest corporate tax burdens, and if you factor in state taxes I belive it is the highest. At that point we can once again easily absorb the tired huddled masses yerning to breath free, and shoot the ne'r do wells who sneak in amoungst them.
Taxes should be done differently, I am not an economist, so I will not attempt to answer that statement.
 

·
Destroyer of Marxism.
Joined
·
875 Posts
If housing didn't cost so damn much, most people wouldn't have a problem buying it. There is no reason rent should be as much as it is, and as for building homes

That's no reason to steal money from me or anyone else, no matter how much they make. Not everyone can live in a 4000 square foot home, and NO ONE DESERVES a home, period. If people SAVED their money properly, instead of spending it on disposable goods and BS, they wouldn't have to rely on huge loans they can't repay.


, there are better and cheaper options than stick framing.

What pray tell is better? Wouldn't the market make it profitable?

It should not take 20-30 years to pay for a house. As for healthcare, why should rich people have good health, and the poor be sick and suffer? Doctors become doctors to help people, not worry about how fat they can make their wallet or drive the newest Porche.

Take that up with the doctor. It is still WRONG to steal from me, and anyone else regardless of what they earn, to pay for anyone else's healthcare, housing, food, clothing, transportation or cuddly bunnies. Furthermore, in order to have good doctors, there needs to be incentive. If medicine didn't pay well, smart competent people would not pursue it as a career.

For the food, we throw away so much in this country no one should go hungry. I would rather see the food be given away than end up in a landfill.

Really now... how many people starved to death in the last 50 years? We give away more food than any other country, perhaps we throw away more too, but again, no one is starving to death. I will also make this point again. GIVING sustenance to people who have the means and ability to acquire it themselves is a crime against humanity. You’ve "given" them a bite to eat, accolades, now they have slipped into dependence. You've stolen their dignity and motivation, and they don't even know it.

For the car, if our cities were designed better, most people would not need a car to get around. It is sprawl and lazy design that contributes to the need for a car.

Not everyone NEEDS a car. People WANT cars, for the freedom of movement, comfort, and in some cases to show off. This luxury is what inspires many people to work in the first place. It makes NO DIFFERENCE how cities are designed. No one wants to wait at a bus stop, or anywhere else for even 30 seconds, where they have to compete for seats, can't smoke, eat or drink, stop anywhere they choose, or listen to whatever they want. Cars provide that, and nothing will ever replace it. Please don't give me the Global Warming bull$h!t either, I'm freezing my a$$ off.

Clothing, see the food excess statement. For cuddly bunnies, I don't really have an answer for that. Even with our economic woes, America is so wealthy, homeless and the poor should be nonexistent.

These people will ALWAYS exist, no mater how much you steal from those who are productive. The middle class isn’t shrinking because of "greedy rich people", it's shrinking because some folks work hard and succeed, and some folks use the "safety net" for a hammock. The increase in "poverty" can be easily paralleled with increases in welfare spending. Furthermore, I've (and I know you have too) seen REAL POVERTY. Our "poor" in many cases have TV's, CABLE, cars, "bling", PS3's, and are FAT. So I don't buy this "poor" BS. We have the RICHEST "poor" people in the world. Also, there are so many programs for the homeless, but many of them are just nuts, or hopeless addicts. Every now and then I give one 5 bucks for a bottle of mad dog, but no matter what we do for them, they will rarely change.

Socialism and liberalism are two different things. Most people who bash Socialism have no clue what it actually is.

I know what socialism has done. Besides the tens of millions who've starved to death, or the tens of millions of innocent people executed by their own governments, please show me ONE socialist country that is the utopia "liberals" envision.


Taxes should be done differently, I am not an economist, so I will not attempt to answer that statement.
You can certainly understand the point I've made. It's elementary, you don't need to be an economist.
 
1 - 20 of 34 Posts
Top