Survivalist Forum banner
1 - 18 of 18 Posts

·
Apocaloptimist
Joined
·
2,748 Posts
This bill is pha-king we-todd-id!!!


A child's "right to be heard" would allow him (or her) to seek governmental review of every parental decision with which the child disagreed.

My kids disagree with just about anything I tell them to do.
"Go clean your room." " No, I don't want to."

"Honey, call the government. Little Johnny and I just disagreed over a room cleaning."

WTF
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,165 Posts
No, just no. No, No, No, NO....NO

To hell with the UN for this crap. I mean if it was about sexual and physical abuse, I would be all or it.

The best interest of the child principle would give the government the ability to override every decision made by every parent if a government worker disagreed with the parent's decision.
So if I decided that I should teach my sister (I'm her guardian) how to shoot a gun and some women in a pant suit didn't like it, they could over ride it. Their trying to take down the American way. I hope Obama and the dems don't fall for it.
 

·
Watchin tha world go by
Joined
·
8,151 Posts
same as they did with NAFTA

say good bye to your sovereignty

Now how many of ya think us right wing, paranoid, tinfoil hat, conspiracy nuts
ARE STILL NUTS
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,165 Posts
I mean I got no problem with legislation and deals that cut down on child slave labor, Child Pornography, trafficking children as sex workers and stuff like that, but this goes way beyond protecting children and makes it so that the government is their parent.

HELL NO!!!
 

·
"I drank what?" -Socrates
Joined
·
1,414 Posts
I mean I got no problem with legislation and deals that cut down on child slave labor, Child Pornography, trafficking children as sex workers and stuff like that, but this goes way beyond protecting children and makes it so that the government is their parent.

HELL NO!!!
That's just it...they want to be everybody's parent. Big Brother knows best.
 

·
Watchin tha world go by
Joined
·
8,151 Posts
They are thinking of as well if they cant git 60 votes of introducing future ones (treaties by UN) as legislation like some trade treaties have been done.

here is the 2008 convention chose from.
http://untreaty.un.org/English/TreatyEvent2008/Treaties/list_english.pdf
git ready for:
Poznan climate change

Law of the sea

International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of their Families

Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court

light arms control treaty
 

·
American fearmaker
Joined
·
14,248 Posts
The UN has ALWAYS been a threat to the US. There are over 120 nations, most of which are in 3rd world status, that go out of their way to denounce us and vote against us. The only practical purpose I see for the UN is so that we can use it as a barometer of hatred directed towards us. It has no other function worth anything to the majority of us in the USA. About the only people in the USA who like, enjoy or worship the UN are our socialists like Bill Clinton and people who want a one world government of some sort... any sort. But, like the old saying goes, "Keep your friends close but keep your enemies closer." That idea could explain why we let the UN stay in New York City. Outside of those reasons, the UN is completely useless and so corrupt that it adds to the ills of the 3rd world nations and does nothing to help the poor, underfed masses. Every year we toss millions of dollars at the UN only to have it line some foreign politician's, general's or dictator's pockets instead of doing good anywhere. We need to force the UN to move out of our nation. With troops if needed.
 
1 - 18 of 18 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top