Survivalist Forum banner

Tactical Ham

855 Views 24 Replies 11 Participants Last post by  GSPHerder
Are there any digital devices available to the public that compress and burst transmissions over Ham freqs?
  • Face Palm
Reactions: 1
1 - 20 of 25 Posts
Are there any digital devices available to the public that compress and burst transmissions over Ham freqs?
Like FLDIGI ...

look into DMR

Can do all modes/ uhf/vhf/hf/analog/digi

\\NNNN
  • Like
  • Helpful
Reactions: 4
Like FLDIGI ...

look into DMR

Can do all modes/ uhf/vhf/hf/analog/digi

\\NNNN

Ive, seen some of those, mostly ft8. Still reading and trying to sort if any of those compress's transmissions.

Thanks.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Like this.........


or this.........


Just gonna take some studying to get started, here's a good book.......


...........or just search HF digital modes on Youtube or Google. This looks like it might be a good video to get started.......

See less See more
  • Helpful
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Use of frequency hopping, pseudorandom, spread spectrum communications is legal for hams.

Same stuff used (technology) used by the USAF for the F-117 some time back.

Don't know of any 'burst' type protocols available to the 'public'.

Anything that you use HAS TO BE, by Law, open source. If you are deliberately trying to encrypt your communications, understand the loss of your license will be the least of your legal troubles.
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Use of frequency hopping, pseudorandom, spread spectrum communications is legal for hams.

Same stuff used (technology) used by the USAF for the F-117 some time back.

Don't know of any 'burst' type protocols available to the 'public'.

Anything that you use HAS TO BE, by Law, open source. If you are deliberately trying to encrypt your communications, understand the loss of your license will be the least of your legal troubles.

Yes, I was anticipating that response, not encrypting just compressing for the sake of shorter transmission time.
  • Like
Reactions: 3
So, I'm not seeing anything in my search, so a question for those that are using digi and hf, is a digi transmission shorter then a voice??
All digi modes on hf will be slow. The data has to be sent multiple times for error correction.

Sent from my SM-G988U using Tapatalk
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Anything that you use HAS TO BE, by Law, open source. If you are deliberately trying to encrypt your communications, understand the loss of your license will be the least of your legal troubles.
97.309(b)

Where authorized by §§ 97.305(c) and 97.307(f), a station may transmit a RTTY or data emission using an unspecified digital code, except to a station in a country with which the United States does not have an agreement permitting the code to be used. RTTY and data emissions using unspecified digital codes must not be transmitted for the purpose of obscuring the meaning of any communication. When deemed necessary by a Regional Director to assure compliance with the FCC Rules, a station must:

(1) Cease the transmission using the unspecified digital code;

(2) Restrict transmissions of any digital code to the extent instructed;

(3) Maintain a record, convertible to the original information, of all digital communications transmitted.
That wasn't an obscured or encrypted transmission Mr. ARRL Volunteer Monitor, I was just experimenting with a new digital mode I'm developing. I call it "NOYFB" but it's not quite ready for publishing yet. ;)
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 4
Are there any digital devices available to the public that compress and burst transmissions over Ham freqs?
11 (2) The Licensee shall only address Messages to other Amateurs or to the stations of those Amateurs and shall not encrypt these Messages for the purpose of rendering the Message unintelligible to other radio spectrum users.
After that, the question would be, is burst transmissions a form of encryption?
11 (2) The Licensee shall only address Messages to other Amateurs or to the stations of those Amateurs and shall not encrypt these Messages for the purpose of rendering the Message unintelligible to other radio spectrum users.
After that, the question would be, is burst transmissions a form of encryption?
in US .mil, when i was in, all burst transmissions were automagically encrypted then sent.

Users could use a cipher code, OTP or some other things, like a book cypher too..

Again, totally against the fcc rules, so....
  • Haha
Reactions: 1
Since these always go off the rails pretty quickly, here's something on topic:
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 3
Use of frequency hopping, pseudorandom, spread spectrum communications is legal for hams.

Same stuff used (technology) used by the USAF for the F-117 some time back.

Don't know of any 'burst' type protocols available to the 'public'.

Anything that you use HAS TO BE, by Law, open source. If you are deliberately trying to encrypt your communications, understand the loss of your license will be the least of your legal troubles.
Not if you have a Commercial (Part 90) License

  • Like
Reactions: 1
Not if you have a Commercial (Part 90) License

Damn!!! you ailed it, forgot all about the commercial stuff...

That right there may be the missing piece....

thank you...(y)
  • Like
Reactions: 3
Damn!!! you ailed it, forgot all about the commercial stuff...

That right there may be the missing piece....

thank you...(y)
Our group has operated under a commercial license for years, and I have one for my own business.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Our group has operated under a commercial license for years, and I have one for my own business.
I have one also it allows me to operate on two frequencies in vhf. Didn't op mention hf?
I have no clue about commercial hf.

Sent from my SM-G988U using Tapatalk
  • Like
Reactions: 1
I have one also it allows me to operate on two frequencies in vhf. Didn't op mention hf?
I have no clue about commercial hf.

Sent from my SM-G988U using Tapatalk
Ah, didn't see that part. Group has both VHF and UHF. I have UHF.
It depends.

With digital, my experience has been it's a sliding scale between Accuracy/Reliability vs Speed. If you want speed, you give up accuracy. If you want accuracy, you give up speed.

A fun thing to mess with is to jack up Fldigi's morse WPM factor. 50 wpm. Sounds really cool on your end, but depending on factors on the receiving end, can be tough for the software (or human) to decipher. It's an eye-opener as far as limitations.

Functional workaround is brevity codes. Single key words that mean entire phrases or a set of directions. As the meme goes: "why waste time say lot word, when few word do trick?" The OG CW guys already thought of this back in the 1900's. It's why we have Q-codes, or NATO Z-codes.

Speaking of: Voice time for speaking of that quote = Approx. ~4 seconds. Olivia 4/2k = ~3.8 seconds. (Note: my timing skills are pretty half-assed.) So technically-speaking yes, digital is shorter transmit time vs voice in this scenario. But there's too many variables to make this legit. Speak like a classy southern gent, and voice will take a lot longer. Speak like a panicked rapper, and voice would be faster. The trick with digital though is making sure that whoever is on the other end can clearly receive and decipher whatever fax machine noises your rig is spitting out.



So, I'm not seeing anything in my search, so a question for those that are using digi and hf, is a digi transmission shorter then a voice??
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Our group has operated under a commercial license for years, and I have one for my own business.
I believe a commercial radio operator's license is different from a site license for a business.
A friend has his commercial license, which is required so that he can maintain broadcast equipment for the local AM & FM stations.

I suspect your license doesn't allow you to work on 50,000 watt transmitters.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
AN individual may be licensed (Commerical radiotelephone license, now called a GROL) to perform maintenance on aeronautical or shipboard systems.

A person or business may be licensed to use part of the spectrum - like GMRS or commercial VHF (MURS)

The GROL (formerly Commerical radiotelephone license) is not required for engineering jobs in radio and television broadcasting.

The more you know....
1 - 20 of 25 Posts
Top