lol, i wouldent refuse any gun if it was GIVEN to me but i'm not paying 1500-$2000 for it.I liked the one I handled, I sure as heck wouldn't refuse one if someone offered! :thumb:
As with most Sig things its over priced. I think it has some good features but i wating for the magpul masada...personaly i hate the Sig 556. I've never shot one but after my touchy feely session i didnt want to. It ratteled worse than any WASR and was just a unweildy.
you loss though. I'm not wasting the money.
What do you plan to pay for the ACR(Masada) because you won't find one for under $3500(if that) when they do finally come out.lol, i wouldent refuse any gun if it was GIVEN to me but i'm not paying 1500-$2000 for it.
yes, it’s basically the same design. The major turnoffs I see are #1 the price and it is front heavy, at least with the AR you can fix that. I also do like the way the whole gun feels, fronts bulky the pistol grips bulky and it just doesn’t 'fit' me. Maybe with a little range time a few hundred off the price I would consider it but I don’t see any advantages to compensate for the negatives.Quick question for you 556 owners:
I know the buttstock is adjustable and folding.......but does the stock adjust for length of pull as quickly and easily as an M4 type stock?
i have one and i do love it, also my wife shoots it very well,so it is easy to use . i do how ever agree with kahn as it is front heavyand it is alot of money. but it is a very well made weapon. mine does not have a foldable stock ,just the standard straight adjustable stock.great gun, but 3 things I don't like. 1. it's front heavy. 2. the price. 3. lack of easily obtainable spare parts.