I'm a lurker. I started assembling my bugout bag last year. And, my partner and I are well on our way to being ready for just about any scenario. However, I'm not sure how to solve my current dilemma and I looking for some advice.
My partner and I are avid minimalist hikers and campers. I have logged over 4500 miles in backcountry hiking with extensive time spent in the Pacific Northwest, the Rocky Mountains and the Southwest. And, naturally, we've taken a minimalist approach to our BOBs. Now, we need to purchase some firearms and this is our dilemma.
I already own a Benelli Nova Pump 12-GA Shotgun. But, what do I supplement this with? I'm torn between a .308 (e.g. the Remington 700 or similar) or a .22lr (e.g. S&W M&P 15-22 or a Ruger 10/22).
By carrying a few different loads, the shotgun can remain usable under a variety of situations, i.e. self-defense, small game, deer, etc. I'm not too concerned about range as most deer are harvested within 150 yards. So, in a pinch, the Benelli should do fine.
But, the .308 would certainly bring stopping power and range into the mix. Washington and British Columbia have a variety of wildlife, some of it on the big side, and a .308 could come in real handy. However, in terms of self-defense, the .308 is not the best choice.
On the other hand, we are more likely to encounter small game, varmint, etc. than larger game along our trek and the .22lr is perfect here. Also, it's lighter. And, if I pickup a model like the M&P 15-22 I listed above, I get semi-auto. In terms of personal defense, it may not have the stopping power of a .357 but multiple rounds to the torso will stop just about anyone. Not to mention, the M&P 15-22 looks like a lot more rifle than it is. Never underestimate the power of intimidation.
Hence, the dilemma. Do I go for range and stopping power? Or, do I go for weight reduction and seemingly more versatility?
I've done enough hiking and camping that I'm know enough to not try and carry a large multi-weapon arsenal when we bugout. It's simply unrealistic. It goes against our minimalist approach. And, finding ammo for all that could be very problematic. This is why I want to keep our firearms to a minimum (i.e. two). So, it's one or the another.
I would love to hear what everyone thinks. And, any ideas or alternatives or advice you have to share would be totally great! Thanks.
My partner and I are avid minimalist hikers and campers. I have logged over 4500 miles in backcountry hiking with extensive time spent in the Pacific Northwest, the Rocky Mountains and the Southwest. And, naturally, we've taken a minimalist approach to our BOBs. Now, we need to purchase some firearms and this is our dilemma.
I already own a Benelli Nova Pump 12-GA Shotgun. But, what do I supplement this with? I'm torn between a .308 (e.g. the Remington 700 or similar) or a .22lr (e.g. S&W M&P 15-22 or a Ruger 10/22).
By carrying a few different loads, the shotgun can remain usable under a variety of situations, i.e. self-defense, small game, deer, etc. I'm not too concerned about range as most deer are harvested within 150 yards. So, in a pinch, the Benelli should do fine.
But, the .308 would certainly bring stopping power and range into the mix. Washington and British Columbia have a variety of wildlife, some of it on the big side, and a .308 could come in real handy. However, in terms of self-defense, the .308 is not the best choice.
On the other hand, we are more likely to encounter small game, varmint, etc. than larger game along our trek and the .22lr is perfect here. Also, it's lighter. And, if I pickup a model like the M&P 15-22 I listed above, I get semi-auto. In terms of personal defense, it may not have the stopping power of a .357 but multiple rounds to the torso will stop just about anyone. Not to mention, the M&P 15-22 looks like a lot more rifle than it is. Never underestimate the power of intimidation.
Hence, the dilemma. Do I go for range and stopping power? Or, do I go for weight reduction and seemingly more versatility?
I've done enough hiking and camping that I'm know enough to not try and carry a large multi-weapon arsenal when we bugout. It's simply unrealistic. It goes against our minimalist approach. And, finding ammo for all that could be very problematic. This is why I want to keep our firearms to a minimum (i.e. two). So, it's one or the another.
I would love to hear what everyone thinks. And, any ideas or alternatives or advice you have to share would be totally great! Thanks.