only one overlooked thing, biological warfare is illegal...
Just because it's illegal doesn't mean it can't/won't be done. Besides, the American government breaks their own laws all the time!only one overlooked thing, biological warfare is illegal...
From what I have read they were developed by the military and are used to spy. If anyone cares to know just search for spy bugs. I don't use Google. From what I have read it's a spyware site also. And I'm so tired of looking up links for people who won't do their own research. Too many are in denial. I have my own problems.Wouldn't it be a lot easier to drop the infected bugs out of a plane or even a car than use some complicated (and possibly unreliable) setup?
True. Except if you wanted to get the infected thing into a controlled area (such as a nuclear facility's ventilation or water systems) the natural bug would be the most unreliable. For all we know it could get eaten or stepped on before it wanders inside by chance.Wouldn't it be a lot easier to drop the infected bugs out of a plane or even a car than use some complicated (and possibly unreliable) setup?
From what I have read they were developed by the military and are used to spy. If anyone cares to know just search for spy bugs. I don't use Google. From what I have read it's a spyware site also. And I'm so tired of looking up links for people who won't do their own research. Too many are in denial. I have my own problems.
Seems like the world only cries foul when America does it, but in a sense yes.It's only illegal when somebody else is doing it.
I wasn't asking you to do any of my research. In fact I wasn't talking to you at all.From what I have read they were developed by the military and are used to spy. If anyone cares to know just search for spy bugs. I don't use Google. From what I have read it's a spyware site also. And I'm so tired of looking up links for people who won't do their own research. Too many are in denial. I have my own problems.
A biological weapon would be a poor choice for a targeted attack against a specific facility as it takes time for the virus/bacteria etc. to affect the people. The incubation period would allow the infected to leave and new ones to come in before any seriously ill effects happened.True. Except if you wanted to get the infected thing into a controlled area (such as a nuclear facility's ventilation or water systems) the natural bug would be the most unreliable. For all we know it could get eaten or stepped on before it wanders inside by chance.
They're already working on that.What about when they put this stuff into people? Then they could control our thoughts and minds! At least we're safe now with completely fair and unbiased media.
As for it being a poor choice or not, I think it really depends on the goal of the ones doing it and the kind of mischief they're looking to cause. Maybe they don't want people to know that it came from the facility right away, but eventually it'll be traced back there as hundreds of people have died from it or whatever. Maybe they want to infect the families and friends of those working at the place, which having a nice incubation period would allow that.A biological weapon would be a poor choice for a targeted attack against a specific facility as it takes time for the virus/bacteria etc. to affect the people. The incubation period would allow the infected to leave and new ones to come in before any seriously ill effects happened.
If there was a way for them to deliver chemical agents then I could see it, but I believe biological attacks would be against the general population.
I wasn't talking to you either. It was general.I wasn't asking you to do any of my research. In fact I wasn't talking to you at all.
My mistake. I shouldn't have jumped so soon.I wasn't talking to you either. It was general.