Survivalist Forum banner

1 - 20 of 24 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
9,107 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Several recent articles related to the Mumbai attacks indicate that terror operations and the manner in which they are carried out are becoming much more sophisticated. We’ve included excerpts from just a few.—–Sixty hours in ...

More...
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5 Posts
According to outlookindia.com the India Navy admits "Systematic failure" during their worst terrorist attack.
Holy "False Flag" Batman! It sounds just like the American defense system during 9/11!
Link Here
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,125 Posts
The attackers, devoted Muslims, were using drugs like cocaine and LSD. True Muslims will not use drugs or alcohol. Remember, they kill people for that stuff. So we are to believe that this is from a group of radical Muslims?

I wouldn't be surprised if it comes out that these guys who did the attack had mental illness issues or something else that made them vulnerable for manipulation.

Train them, brainwash them, drug them up and turn them loose to kill.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sweeper

·
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒ&
Joined
·
8,248 Posts
This is something I have warned folks of for years. I am surprised that the "terrorists" have not done something like this in the US. A shopping mall at christmas would be an easy target so would a public pool, the opening of a 10k run and a plethora of other soft targets.
 

·
Ron Paul 2012
Joined
·
658 Posts
According to outlookindia.com the India Navy admits "Systematic failure" during their worst terrorist attack.
Holy "False Flag" Batman! It sounds just like the American defense system during 9/11!
Link Here
Exactly... NORAD didn't fail to escort Payne Stewart's plane, however they're told to 'stand down' by Cheney on 9/11.

Same thing in the 7/7 bombings. Same MO.
 

·
I help enlighten folks
Joined
·
16,624 Posts
The attackers, devoted Muslims, were using drugs like cocaine and LSD. True Muslims will not use drugs or alcohol. Remember, they kill people for that stuff. So we are to believe that this is from a group of radical Muslims?

I wouldn't be surprised if it comes out that these guys who did the attack had mental illness issues or something else that made them vulnerable for manipulation.

Train them, brainwash them, drug them up and turn them loose to kill.
real Muslims don't do any of this terrorism, it's the violent fundamentalists, similar to what you'll find in a Christian flavor on this very board.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,121 Posts
Exactly... NORAD didn't fail to escort Payne Stewart's plane, however they're told to 'stand down' by Cheney on 9/11.

Same thing in the 7/7 bombings. Same MO.
Oh, but who pays attention to things like "facts".. Bill Oreilly told us that we are unpatriotic *******s for thinking such foolish nonsense...

And yes, that was sarcasm, for those who don't know me..
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,125 Posts
real Muslims don't do any of this terrorism, it's the violent fundamentalists, similar to what you'll find in a Christian flavor on this very board.
Right and the violent fundamentalists don't consume alcohol and drugs before their death do they?

http://www.infowars.com/?p=6332
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sweeper

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,182 Posts
Pakistani Security Consultant Calls Mumbai Attacks A "Botched" False Flag
Says Hindu zionists and Mossad behind attacks meant to imitate 9/11.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...hed_by_Hindu_Zionists/articleshow/3785654.cms
Hamid said that it was a "badly planned" operation that had gone horribly wrong.

"The Americans executed the 9/11 attack perfectly. They managed the media very well. The Indians tried to repeat the formula but goofed up. The idiots made a complete mess of it."
:D: :D: :D: :D: :D:
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
6,848 Posts
Why is it so hard to believe that these things aren't orchestrated by governments? That people motivated on the death and destruction of others can't achieve their aims?

Every year a few Americans go on the rampage and kill tens of people, are these massacres orchestrated by your government?

If you want to believe 9/11 and these Indian attacks were "false flag" attacks, then fine. But please don't tell me that 7/7 was orchestrated by the British government because I would have to say that's utter bull.

As was said in another post, a Mosque in India was refusing to bury the terrorists because they said what they did was un-Islamic, it is forbidden to attack civilians.

I believe there are over 50 Islamic sects in the world, much like there are many, many interpretations of Christianity.

As for these guys been off their heads on drugs, what does that matter? If they hadn't of been on drugs would that make things better? If they'd done it sober they would still have been "off their heads" to carry out such an attack. And yes, I've heard about these Jihadi's off their heads on drugs before. They'll justify whatever, even murder, if they think it is in their cause to do so.

Psychotic murder is psychotic murder, it doesn't matter if it's done by fundamentalists in foreign lands, homegrown "fundies" in Britain or born and bred Yanks shooting up churches, schools, colleges,malls or blowing up FBI buildings.

YB
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,182 Posts
Why is it so hard to believe that these things aren't orchestrated by governments? That people motivated on the death and destruction of others can't achieve their aims?

Every year a few Americans go on the rampage and kill tens of people, are these massacres orchestrated by your government?

If you want to believe 9/11 and these Indian attacks were "false flag" attacks, then fine. But please don't tell me that 7/7 was orchestrated by the British government because I would have to say that's utter bull.

As was said in another post, a Mosque in India was refusing to bury the terrorists because they said what they did was un-Islamic, it is forbidden to attack civilians.

I believe there are over 50 Islamic sects in the world, much like there are many, many interpretations of Christianity.

As for these guys been off their heads on drugs, what does that matter? If they hadn't of been on drugs would that make things better? If they'd done it sober they would still have been "off their heads" to carry out such an attack. And yes, I've heard about these Jihadi's off their heads on drugs before. They'll justify whatever, even murder, if they think it is in their cause to do so.

Psychotic murder is psychotic murder, it doesn't matter if it's done by fundamentalists in foreign lands, homegrown "fundies" in Britain or born and bred Yanks shooting up churches, schools, colleges,malls or blowing up FBI buildings.

YB
I get suspicious of these types of events when you can see the projected outcome. Did 9/11 benefit Islam in any way? No. Who did it benefit? Big government and financiers who control them.

I don't know for sure if the incident in Mumbai was an inside job or not. I only suspect. Why are they so quick to pin this on Pakistan? Why didn't police fire back? How could the boats have evaded India's radar? Why did they relax security when they were pre-warned? This isn't the first time India has tried to pin a "terrorist" attack on Pakistan.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
6,848 Posts
9/11 benefited the fundies.

It set the "West" against Islamic countries, going to Iraq only fell into their game play.

Tony Blair supported George Bush because he knew Bush wasn't going to back down. Going to Afghanistan was only right and proper, but the US going after Saddam by themselves was unthinkable politically. The US would've exposed themselves to huge political pressure, I'm sure they could've done it militarily by themselves but someone had to drum up political support across the world. Something that the Bush Admin. wasn't really bothered about. If this happened it would open the US to huge political, social, military problems.

Through his faithfulness to America and the American people, Tony Blair thought it was his job to be the "middle man" and gain some military and political consensus.

IMO, Tony Blair knew that if the Brits stayed out, few countries would ally themselves with the Americans on the Iraq issue.

Whatever some of the American members here think, Britain is still highly regarded as a political force for good and a top military power through out the world.

The idea of the US going it alone without any world wide support, would undoubtedly fall in to the hands of the Islamists, what with GW's comments of "crusades" it would seem exactly that to every Muslim. The US going "off on one" in anger to attack people who had nothing to do with 9/11 was not what the British (or the world needed).

So for the safety of the US and the world, Tony Blair made himself a political martyr (sad eh?) to try and keep a world balance.

This is only how I see things, off topic probably, sorry....

YB
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,407 Posts
By the way, where does tony blair stand nowadays? I heard he is a defender of the faiths, as( ihttp://radiohadhwanaag.com/index.php?news=371n) a ONE world religion.Not getting off, topic, just trying to be aware as to the motives behind alot of events happening at the moment.When church and state join together, beware.
A kingdom divided against itself does not prosper.Many of the Asian countries are divided only because of trade possibilities,it,s gone past culture and to some extent religion now.Not that our news coverage tells us that.
sorry, link did not work, will try again .
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
6,848 Posts
I get suspicious of these types of events when you can see the projected outcome. Did 9/11 benefit Islam in any way? No. Who did it benefit? Big government and financiers who control them.

I don't know for sure if the incident in Mumbai was an inside job or not. I only suspect. Why are they so quick to pin this on Pakistan? Why didn't police fire back? How could the boats have evaded India's radar? Why did they relax security when they were pre-warned? This isn't the first time India has tried to pin a "terrorist" attack on Pakistan.
Why are they so quick to pin this on Pakistan?
Pakistan is an enemy of India.

Since Indian independence and then the partition of India into Pakistan there was a huge amount of blood letting between the two peoples.

Muslims who were caught up in the north of India were massacred, just as Hindus were, but figure Hindus have 3-1 advantage.

The province of Kashmir has been fought over for 50yrs.

Many of the Pakistanis who are in Leeds and Bradford come from Kashmir. "Free Kashmir" was, and is a popular piece of graffiti across my city.

Just as the Pakistani ISI (and later with the Taliban) was involved in Afghanistan, like the CIA and MI6 were during the Soviet occupation, the ISI was involved with the Kashmiri "freedom fighters".

It would stand to "Nationalist Hindu" reasoning that the Pakistanis would be behind "any" Muslim terrorist activity.

Why weren't the terrorist boats picked up on radar?

I can't say...but small boats are exactly what our waterborne SF use to evade radar.

I believe the police did try to fire back, but those on the scene were either low trained, low on ammo or just simply stunned into inaction and self preservation.

Ask yourself, why have American police units sat outside of massacres of schools and colleges? Why did they sit there and do nothing? They had more ammunition, comms, bullet proof jackets, and far far more pay... Yet they allowed untrained teenagers to rule the roost.

YB
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
6,848 Posts
I would also to have to remind people about the Indian caste system.

They literally have a group of people called "untouchables". The lowest of the low.

This concept is alien to the 3 Abrahamic religions, Judaism, Christianity and Islam.

While I personally like British Hindus, they aren't anything like Indian Hindus, they are more "liberal" than that.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,125 Posts
9/11 benefited the fundies.

It set the "West" against Islamic countries, going to Iraq only fell into their game play.

Tony Blair supported George Bush because he knew Bush wasn't going to back down. Going to Afghanistan was only right and proper, but the US going after Saddam by themselves was unthinkable politically. The US would've exposed themselves to huge political pressure, I'm sure they could've done it militarily by themselves but someone had to drum up political support across the world. Something that the Bush Admin. wasn't really bothered about. If this happened it would open the US to huge political, social, military problems.

Through his faithfulness to America and the American people, Tony Blair thought it was his job to be the "middle man" and gain some military and political consensus.

IMO, Tony Blair knew that if the Brits stayed out, few countries would ally themselves with the Americans on the Iraq issue.

Whatever some of the American members here think, Britain is still highly regarded as a political force for good and a top military power through out the world.

The idea of the US going it alone without any world wide support, would undoubtedly fall in to the hands of the Islamists, what with GW's comments of "crusades" it would seem exactly that to every Muslim. The US going "off on one" in anger to attack people who had nothing to do with 9/11 was not what the British (or the world needed).

So for the safety of the US and the world, Tony Blair made himself a political martyr (sad eh?) to try and keep a world balance.

This is only how I see things, off topic probably, sorry....

YB
Just how did it fall into their game plan??
 
1 - 20 of 24 Posts
Top