Survivalist Forum banner

1 - 19 of 19 Posts

·
Only Half Human
Joined
·
533 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Text size: From the Los Angeles Times
Military to be on high alert for inauguration
About 11,500 troops, including chemical attack experts, will join the security detail as Obama takes the oath of office.
By Julian E. Barnes
December 18, 2008
Reporting from Washington - The U.S. military will be on high alert during Barack Obama's inauguration, increasing air defenses and deploying chemical attack experts and medical units, a general said Wednesday.

Air Force Gen. Victor E. Renuart Jr., who heads the military command that oversees security for North America, said the Defense Department had not been told of specific Inauguration Day threats. Nonetheless, he said, the armed services must be ready.

"It would make news for a terrorist element or rogue element to interrupt that event," Renuart said. "So it is prudent to plan for the possibility of that event and to deter it or to respond to it."

The preparations come amid heightened security concerns during the presidential transition. The Bush administration is planning to provide the president-elect with a series of contingency plans for potential international emergencies, including terrorist strikes and electronic attacks, that could occur after Obama takes the oath of office.



Related links
L.A. Now: Sheriff slashes number of deputies going to Obama inauguration
Top of the Ticket: Obama, Biden wisely plan extra time for inauguration train trip
Presidential inaugural program The Secret Service is in charge of security for the inauguration. The agency is coordinating with local police departments, as well as with 4,000 law enforcement officers from 96 jurisdictions. About 11,500 military personnel will take part.

Secret Service officials have established 23 planning teams but have provided few details. Inauguration organizers are considering a loudspeaker system to broadcast evacuation instructions in the event of an attack.

Renuart said the military's preparations were meant to support civilian-led efforts.

After 2001, the U.S. Northern Command, frequently called Northcom, was given broad responsibility for assisting with domestic security. Renuart is also the commander of the North American Aerospace Defense Command, which guards U.S. airspace.

The military response is not unprecedented. Northern Command officials said they provided security for inaugural activities in 2005, as well as for national political conventions and major athletic events such as the Super Bowl.

Some military personnel will be part of the inauguration, playing in bands, marching in parades and conducting honor ceremonies. But Renuart said much of the force would have a security role.

About 4,000 National Guard members will provide support to local law enforcement, boosting security on the National Mall and around Washington, where millions of people are expected. There also will be 7,500 troops under federal control, including emergency medical teams and experts in chemical attacks.

Air defenses around Washington are always tight, but Renuart said the number of patrols would increase.

The contingencies to be conveyed by the White House to the Obama team are separate from the inaugural preparations. They are meant to ensure that the new administration is as prepared as possible on Jan. 20.

The White House briefing, first reported by the New York Times, is part of a larger transition effort by the National Security Council to identify international trouble spots for the new administration.

Gordon Johndroe, a spokesman for the National Security Council, said: "We want to provide them, especially in the first few weeks, the basis for which they can have some information to make their decisions. This is a menu of contingencies and possible options."

Obama is trying to fill key national security jobs, hoping the Senate will confirm many of his appointments on the day of the inauguration or soon after.

Johndroe said the Bush administration would make sure there were career officials ready to act should a crisis develop before Obama's appointees were confirmed.

[email protected]

Josh Meyer in our Washington bureau contributed to this report.



You might like:
General: Inauguration Day will see military on high alert in D.C. (@chicagotribune.com - Nation/World)Military's Northern Command to bolster security at inauguration (@chicagotribune.com - Nation/World)Military to be on high alert during Obama inauguration (@chicagotribune.com)2 more recommended posts »
Related topic galleries: National Security, Heads of State, Government, The White House, New York Times, 2009 U.S. Presidential Inauguration, 2009 U.S. Presidential Transition
All topicsMake a difference for the area's neediest: Give to Chicago Tribune Charities

Copyright © 2008, The Los Angeles Times

Read all 35 comments »
Type in your comments to post to the forum
Name
(appears on your post) You are currently logged in as . Not ?
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:



Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.
 

·
Who is John Galt?
Joined
·
585 Posts
I like this line...."Johndroe said the Bush administration would make sure there were career officials ready to act should a crisis develop before Obama's appointees were confirmed".........no we don't mind, heck we will stay another 8 years if you like...lol
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
173 Posts
Why would someone want to hurt him....he's the one...THE Change....a world citizen who will unite the world, solve hunger and bring prosperity to all nations...... oh, and try to ban guns....
 

·
I'm the boogey man.......
Joined
·
6,686 Posts
Not even sworn in and already going to violate The Posse Comitatus Act. What a promising start!!!!

This is gonna suck for the next 4 years....
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
18,814 Posts
Can we say overkill? Reminds me of Russia and N Korea when they parade the military around during some public political event just to prove how big n' bad they are.

It's just a display meant for the American public to instill a lil' fear at government's awesome badazzness. Of course the irony is that it's at the taxpayers expense. It actually pi**es me off more than anything else.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
173 Posts
I guess if the one is harmed then they are more worried about riots, so maybe it's not so much protecting him, but trying more to keep the "peace" if that makes sense.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
3,228 Posts
Can we say overkill? Reminds me of Russia and N Korea when they parade the military around during some public political event just to prove how big n' bad they are.

It's just a display meant for the American public to instill a lil' fear at government's awesome badazzness. Of course the irony is that it's at the taxpayers expense. It actually pi**es me off more than anything else.
Wow well said.
 

·
Bleach blonde on fire :p
Joined
·
6,173 Posts
I guess if the one is harmed then they are more worried about riots, so maybe it's not so much protecting him, but trying more to keep the "peace" if that makes sense.
Keeping the peace will be really hard if anything happens to the "chosen one" at the event.
 

·
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒ&
Joined
·
8,248 Posts
Ummm, it is me or is it normal to have over 11,500 members of the military "on hand" for a presidential inaugeration? This didn't happen when Bush took over--and there are plenty of nutjobs who would like to bag him even more.

I guess it would have been 20,000--they still in training though.
 

·
Pray for our troops
Joined
·
440 Posts
booze flowin'.?

I read in the paper they're gonna keep the bars open till 5AM,do you think that'll keep the rowdys calmed down.? :upsidedown: :xeye:
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
73 Posts
They usually are so why is this newsworhty? Maybe it is the ignorance of the LA Times reporter who thinks this is new news and different than usual. I think jouralistic ignorance is often behind the creation and presentation of articles.
 
1 - 19 of 19 Posts
Top