Joined
·
1,021 Posts
I shoot archery, but I don't bow-hunt and have only had a passing interest in killing something with a bow. However, in a recent discussion with some rifle-hunting friends, they took a pretty adamant stance AGAINST bowhunting for two key reasons.
1) Arrows are less likely to kill quickly on the first shot. Unless you hit in the spine or brain, they work by bleeding out the target and this takes time. During this time, the panicked animal is running around freaking out, and its muscles are filling up with adrenaline and endorphins that make the meat taste poor.
2) Because arrows require bleeding to kill, shot placement is critical. Apparently many hunters see otherwise healthy deer wandering around the forest with poorly placed arrows hanging out the sides of them with infected but not lethal wounds.
As I said, these ideas come from people who have never bow-hunted and have made up their minds to never try, because they do not think it is a responsible and human way of dispatching the animal. Your thoughts?
1) Arrows are less likely to kill quickly on the first shot. Unless you hit in the spine or brain, they work by bleeding out the target and this takes time. During this time, the panicked animal is running around freaking out, and its muscles are filling up with adrenaline and endorphins that make the meat taste poor.
2) Because arrows require bleeding to kill, shot placement is critical. Apparently many hunters see otherwise healthy deer wandering around the forest with poorly placed arrows hanging out the sides of them with infected but not lethal wounds.
As I said, these ideas come from people who have never bow-hunted and have made up their minds to never try, because they do not think it is a responsible and human way of dispatching the animal. Your thoughts?