Survivalist Forum banner
1 - 20 of 23 Posts

· Founder
Joined
·
17,151 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
The medium ALICE pack can be used without a frame, but I would like to hear from people who have used it with and without the frame and which one they feel best about.

I have a medium ALICE pack on a frame, and that is the only way I have ever used it. The frame seems to draw the top of the pack a little tight, and restricts access how much can fit in the medium ALICE pack.

Would it be worth it to take my medium ALICE pack off the frame and use it for a day pack? If nothing else I would b able to compare with and without the frame.

Why take the medium ALICE pack off the frame? Because of the weight. I could probably shave a couple of pounds off the pack wight just be getting rid of the frame.
 

· reluctant sinner
Joined
·
23,422 Posts
If you are worried about the weight you should consider looking for a new frame pack. Military stuff isn't usually noted as being light weight.

I don't enjoy being poked in the back by some hard sharp edged object so an external frame pack works for me.

A larger pack doesn't add much weight, the trick is not always filling it up because there is room for more stuff.
 

· Si vis pacem, para bellum
Joined
·
9,085 Posts
I've walked many miles with and without the frame. What Brett says is the truth. Living in Texas, for that reason alone I will always use the frame with mine. But wait there's more. If you carry a heavy load in the pack the frame will shift some of the weight off of the shoulders and onto the waist. The waist strap also keeps the pack from bouncing around in rough terrain.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
5,438 Posts
Most of the alice packs that I am aware of live in the trunk of someone's car, waiting for the day the will be called into action. I have one with a frame that lives in my garage. last used years ago on day hunts. I have several with out the frames that I use as llama packs. I used a wood insert in the top pocket and lash them to llama pack saddle. for real back packing I use a freighter frame and pack. I live in California and it is hot for summer packing. the air circulation is nice. Unfortunately the frame allows additional stuff to be attached and the unit gets heavy. Without a frame it is OK as a day pack. there are better. A frameless pack with proper padding is superior. I have one which is old and faded, it works when required. for heavy loads and distance travel, I think you need an external frame.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
5,983 Posts
Frame use all the way.

I've used frameless ALICE Mediums as assault packs to creep up on a surveillance point, assault line of departure, or to conduct reconnaissance of an objective. Where I needed to carry a few bulky specific mission items (radio, surveillance optics, demolitions, bolt cutters, some extra hawk gear, etc.). Very limited items and limited distances covered. In other words, using the frameless Medium like a soft day pack or book bag. Just as easy to accomplish that using the frame.

But for general walking/hiking/humping across many kilometers... I'd never entertain the notion of going frameless. Not unless I were keeping the weight down to well under 20 lbs. Using it as a place to stuff a bulky (but light weight) puffy parka, rain suit, and a few other odds and ends.

As neiowa mentioned, w/o the frame, you're just carrying an ungainly small dufflebag with shoulder straps. One that fills up like a big nylon barrel and shifts its load constantly, wanting to roll left or right across your back. If you fill up a Medium to max capacity/weight, it's a miserable hiker without the frame.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bob3rd and neiowa

· Registered
Joined
·
211 Posts
I have a medium alice pack and I prefer using it without the frame.
I actually used the frame by it's self for hiking in sacks of cement. The frame cracked in 2 places after a few months of hard use, but I was able to drill holes and bolt it together with some plumbers strap.
 

· Banned
Joined
·
227 Posts
The Aiice gear sucks a big one. Whomever let it become or let it remain GI should have been hung. Without a frame, with just 25 lbs, it will eat your lunch in a very few hours. With a frame, and 35 lbs, it will eat your lunch even sooner. it's not worth a dime. It will chafe you within an hour and blister/rub you raw in another hour. I would burn any such gear that I was given as a present. Get used REI or other quality civilian gear, Spray paint it camo if need be. You need a stiff, padded hip belt. and aluminum, fiberglass or carbon fiber stays in the pack, to shift the weight to your hip belt. If you ignore this advice, you'll be very sorry.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
5,983 Posts
The ALICE pack is what it is. A surplus military pack... but still very well regarded by folks who have actually spent years and thousands of miles wearing them. Me for instance.

Every time I read some drive-by comment about how much they suck... I know the person either made up the remarks or spent very little time humping them. A few Basic Training road marches and a few FTX movements (Field Training Exercises) with a pack that spent 99% of its time in a storage locker. Never really broken in or adjusted to the wearer and the rest of his combat gear.

Is it a gossamer cuben-fiber dream to carry? Hell no, but myself and every man I worked with managed to make that pack work across many a hard mile without too much complaint. Or difficulty. Maybe I just have a different definition of discomfort than most...

I routinely carried that pack design across 5 continents for 30+ years. So did everyone I worked with. It was my 3-season weapon of choice. In winter or mountainous climes, I tended to go with my Lowe Alpine Expedition or LOCO packs. Or my Gregorys. But for most other places and scenarios, the ALICE Large was the one I jumped in. And took to war. Or swam with into beaches. Patrolled with. Humped aerial resupply loads with. The one I lived out of while walking across quite a bit of Planet Earth.

Walk into any present day (2020) US Army Special Forces ODA Team Room or Navy SEAL Platoon Bay and you'll be amazed at the number of ALICE Large packs still employed by experienced guys... young and old. People who are already issued very expensive Mystery Ranch, Eberlestock, Lowe Alpine, and Gregory packs. When people leave $700 packs back in the team room in favor of personally purchased ALICE rucks that cost well under $100... that's called a Clue.

The mere fact that a 48 year old design is still a favorite among folks who seriously depend upon functional packs is telling. It's a working pack, not a comfort item. 62 liters of 100+ pound load hauling with an external frame for pack board use.

Across nearly 35 years of humping/jumping/swimming/skiing a Large ALICE (all of it while serving in either a Ranger Battalion or Special Forces Groups), I managed to break exactly one frame. Rode it in to a muddy tank trail, during a night time thunderstorm, down in Ft McClellan, AL. Air Force missed the CARP drop zone and dropped us very low. No time to lower ruck. I spiraled my canopy into the only opening that wasn't forest. When I touched down, I pranged into about knee high mud, and snapped my frame tubes in half... on both sides. My PLF points of impact looked like Feet, Knees, then nearly Face as I bowed over the ruck. Essentially a Stand Up Landing into a mud pit. Other than that instance, one of the more durable external framed packs I've ever used. OTOH, I'm pretty sure I'd have broken any external frame (of any design) on that particular landing.

Upgraded with modern shoulder straps & hip belts, the old tick is as comfortable to carry as many more modern packs. Not all, but many.

The thing is inexpensive to buy; modular for easy disassembly, major parts replacement, & practical field repairs; carries immense weight for its size without straining; is shaped to wear with fighting gear; offers subdued tactical coloration; is very durable & tough; and well arranged for gear access...especially in the dark.

I repeatedly read posts about how heavy the ALICE pack is. Usually completely fabricated numbers.

Actual Weight statistics for ALICE rucks:

The issue ALICE Large (3800 cu in / 62 liter) pack bag weighs 3 lbs, 1 ounce.
The issue ALICE Medium (2350 cu in / 38.5 liter) pack bag weighs 2 lbs, 12.8 ounces.
The issue ALICE LC-2 aluminum frame weighs 3 lbs, 12.8 ounces.
ALICE Large pack w/ frame = 6 lbs, 13.8 ounces. Slightly (2.2 oz) under 7 lbs total.
ALICE Medium w/ frame = 6 lbs, 9.6 ounces total. Slightly (1.6 oz) over 6.5 lbs total.

BLUF: It's a 6.5+ lb, 62 liter, overbuilt workhorse that will reliably handle portage loads into the 110 lb range. Meaning that it doesn't even break into a stitching sweat with 60, 70, or 85 lb loads.

Compared to commercial packs with roughly the same cubic volume and roughly similar heavier duty fabric build (as opposed to ultralight construction), the Large ALICE comes in at about 1.5 to 2 lbs heavier by way of comparison. But will haul twice the load for about 1/3 the price. Or even less if you find one on sale. And it won't get you shot because you're walking around with a huge brightly colored Skittle on your back.

Which makes it perfectly performing surplus for the occasional hiker or hunter. Or the prepper who wants a bombproof emergency load hauler for a BOB. Or the person who needs to equip several family members without busting the household budget. Or the person who doesn't have a lot of disposable income to begin with, but needs a proven and dependable backpack for very little money.

Naturally, folks who spend time knocking out lots of recreational miles will tend to gravitate to more comfortable packs. And lighter packs. Me included. Naturally, you can lay out good cash for featherweight gear and take to the trails wearing a 2-3 lb pack. But you won't be using those to haul heavy bulk supplies, quartered elk, 10 days worth of rations and bivouac gear, backpack radios, fuel cans, scavenged loads, or for armed wear with a combat harness and a long gun. Things you might need to do in a non-recreational context.

I own quite a few packs. Small to monster sized. Some are pretty expensive. I own 95 & 103 liter winter expedition packs. 50-80 liter hiking packs. Smaller climbing & hunting packs. GHB packs. Day packs. Assault packs. Ski touring packs.

My 7 day / 3-season BOB, thoughtfully packed for some (admittedly) unlikely day of emergency need? My old ALICE Large. The actual one I carried in Iraq & Afghanistan.

If you want to focus on purely comfortable recreational hiking, by all means, buy something for feather weight travel that better suits such a focus. But for tough times or uncertain scenarios, that old military succubus is still a safe choice.

Horses for Courses. It's an affordable military surplus option that still delivers the mail.
 

· force multiplier
Joined
·
257 Posts
Kev

I agree nearly completely with everything that Astronomy said regarding the ALICE. Aside from the Hellcat; my EDC pack is a medium ALICE USMC radio pack( it has a padded back). I carry it everyday loaded with approx 30+/- lbs of gear sometimes lighter and a little heavier in the summer months(additional hydration). I use LC2 straps with the "bobcat" mod I posted in this forum 10 years ago shortly after my Hellcat mods.

This EDC pack is exclusively utilized w/o the frame. The bobcat mod keeps the top straight and the back flat. This prevents the pack from taking a "duffle bag" shape; which keeps it from rolling around on your back and gear. I also used a similar set up while in the TNSG; I preferred the frameless ALICE because it was easier to don and doff over my ALICE LB gear. I find the set up equally effective using current load bearing vests, plate carriers and battle(war) belts.

If you plan to use the med ALICE as a EDC bag; I suggest the mods above and without the frame. If you plane to use it for light camping, hiking or hunting. I'd go with the frame and even consider the Hellcat mods since you already have the frame and pack. Otherwise, since good ALICE gear is getting pricey and scarce; the MOLLE and MOLLE II rucks and assault packs are much cheaper now. The whole reason I made the Hellcat was to save money over the newer MOLLE gear back then. Times change but your med ALICE isn't irrelevant and still a good option; with or without the frame.

A few pics of my EDC medium ALICE





Bobcat mod; keeps the pack from "duffling" at the top



Best Regards

Rod
 

· force multiplier
Joined
·
257 Posts
Hey Enforcer: Would you please post a link to that Bobcat modification thread?
Here you go. It's buried in the thread "ALICE Pack and MSS Carrier on External Frame" By Vondoozit; here's the link to the page. It's about halfway down. The Hellcat build is a couple of pages in front of it.

https://www.survivalistboards.com/showthread.php?t=47472&page=5

Here's a link to my blog that has the Bobcat mod as well as the Hellcat assembly

http://libertytreeblogs.blogspot.com/2011/05/frameless-alice-modification-bobcat_05.html

I haven't posted on my blog for over 8 years; thats going to change here shortly;)

The pack you see in the post's 10 years ago; is the same pack you see in the post above( I took those this afternoon). I have carried it nearly every day for 12 years. Work, vacation, travel; it's been with me nearly everywhere. I change side arms more than I switch packs :thumb:

Best Regards

Rod
 

· MortarMaggot
Joined
·
3,518 Posts
I humped Alice a lot when I was in. It might seem counter-intuitive but I found it more comfortable with the frame. I should qualify that by saying that if I was just carrying some clothes, a bag, puss pad, i.e. soft stuff going without the frame might be better, but if you are carrying heavy & hard sided stuff & plan on attaching things externally, it's better to use the frame. I'm sure some of the newer stuff is better, but it's also expensive. My son is in the infantry too now & he had wanted me to send him one of my Alice packs w/frame for his pre-ranger course he took, but then they told him he would have to use current issue. He said he preferred the old Alice pack over the new stuff, but that might just be the newer stuff he's been issued, I'm sure some of the ranger batt's & SF units have nicer packs, but again, that's usually also more $$$.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
764 Posts
I would be one of those guys who only carried a medium through basic and a few very mild FTX as a POG mechanic and even I know that beingto guy doesn't know what he's talking about.

They're functional, tough as hell, not uncomfortable if you know what you're doing, and 25 years later I still have and use the extra one I acquired back then.

Yes keep it on the frame unless your're packing a load that's both light and small enough you don't need a bag near that big anyway.
Light but bulky will still swing around your back without the frame.
Heavy no matter the bulk, frame transfers more weight to hips, less on shoulders.
 
1 - 20 of 23 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top