Survivalist Forum banner
Cancel
Create thread New Forums

Cancer research / treatments

Tags
cancer treatment
Jump to Latest
3.2K views 18 replies 5 participants last post by  ForestBeekeeper  
#1 ·
At the organic / prepper-survivalist fair I attended, one workshop was presented by an Oncologist.

I mentioned this previously, and I got a few PMs from folks asking for more information. So I have scanned the handouts for you folks.

The Oncologist survived cancer himself. And he has been amassing a lot of data that has been piece-meal published in Medical Journals.

Specific phyto-nutrients that trigger cancer rejection. Which usually then goes into synthetic manufacture, FDA testing, and trials.

He went the other way and lists which plant herbs contain each of those phyto-nutrients.

He made a big chart listing all forms of cancers cross-linked to which herbs cure each, as well as specific genetic traits, environmental exposures, behaviors, and diets.

He is a semiretired MD. Not selling anything, not marketing anything. No website. Just gathering this data, and he presented what he has at this workshop. It was pretty neat.

All of his data, is peer-reviewed and published stuff available to EVERYONE in the cancer industry.

He supports this with a massive stack of articles from Universities, the CDC, American Association for Cancer Research, and the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

What I have are the handouts he gave.

First are the power-point slides he showed, then a detailed list with lots of data, and finally a color flowchart cross-index.

http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v205/gyoung09/cancer workshop/
 
#2 ·
#3 ·
#4 ·
#5 ·
#6 ·
#7 ·
#8 ·
#9 ·
#8

If you notice, within Curcumin are many specific nutrients that fight cancer. From among those only a few have yet been synthesised by drug companies for market.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v205/gyoung09/cancer workshop/cancer0045.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v205/gyoung09/cancer workshop/cancer0046.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v205/gyoung09/cancer workshop/cancer0049.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v205/gyoung09/cancer workshop/cancer0050.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v205/gyoung09/cancer workshop/cancer0051.jpg
 
#10 ·
#11 ·
#12 ·
#15 ·
Thanks for all the work you put in to post these.

I have to admit I didn't understand it all - and some things seemed contradictory or a bit odd - for example, in one of the breast cancer slides it said going for walks was a good thing. Then in another slide under things to avoid was "physical activity" (along with excess sunshine, and a bunch of other things). Did I misread something?

Also a bit odd was in the risk factors or helpful factors in breast cancer, I was a bit bemused to see "lactation" in the post-menapausal chart! I'm supposing that it means previous lactation which coincides with what I have heard elsewhere . I guess there is always hope for a baby after the normal time! (Sarah comes to mind.) Actually pregnancy itself is a reducer of breast and other female cancers (with the exception of cervical cancer) - it looks like menstruating as often and as long as modern women do, just is not very healthy.

Anyway, thanks again. I know it was time consuming to put up all these links.
 
#16 ·
Rosesandtea said:
Thanks for all the work you put in to post these.

I have to admit I didn't understand it all - and some things seemed contradictory or a bit odd - for example, in one of the breast cancer slides it said going for walks was a good thing. Then in another slide under things to avoid was "physical activity" (along with excess sunshine, and a bunch of other things). Did I misread something?
Click to expand...
I do remember that in the discussion, he said that in child-bearing females carrying extra weight causes less cancer. But that once you are past child-bearing you need to get rid of the extra weight.

In your lifetime you need to do at least 2 years of breast feeding to tweak the odds of breast cancer down.



... Also a bit odd was in the risk factors or helpful factors in breast cancer, I was a bit bemused to see "lactation" in the post-menapausal chart! I'm supposing that it means previous lactation which coincides with what I have heard elsewhere . I guess there is always hope for a baby after the normal time! (Sarah comes to mind.) Actually pregnancy itself is a reducer of breast and other female cancers (with the exception of cervical cancer) - it looks like menstruating as often and as long as modern women do, just is not very healthy.

Anyway, thanks again. I know it was time consuming to put up all these links.
Click to expand...
Yes 'lactation' was if you had completed the lifetime amount of breast feeding.
 
#17 ·
I found the part about Curcumin interesting.

Also 'resveratrol', he mentioned grape skins and blueberries, but not knotweed. So I asked and he was not aware that knotweed produces more resveratrol than grapes or blueberries.

I did some research myself, while trying to find a way to combat knotweed.
 
Survivalist Forum
posts
12M
members
169K
Since
2007
A forum community dedicated to survivalists and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about collections, gear, DIY projects, hobbies, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more!
Full Forum Listing
Explore Our Forums
Off Topic Lounge Disaster Preparedness General Discussion Firearms General Discussion New Member Introductions Financial Forum