Survivalist Forum banner

1 - 11 of 11 Posts
Joined
·
14,471 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
I wonder if he "grabbed 'em by the *****" too?

WaPo article: Mike Bloomberg for years has battled women’s allegations of profane, sexist comments

Read the 32 page booklet for yourself: The Portable Bloomberg: The Wit & Wisdom of Michael Bloomberg

Read the federal complaint for yourself: Sekiko Sakai Garrison v. Michael Bloomberg and Bloomberg, L.P.

Several lawsuits have been filed over the years alleging that women were discriminated against at Bloomberg’s business-information company, including a case brought by a federal agency and one filed by a former employee, who blamed Bloomberg for creating a culture of sexual harassment and degradation.
 

·
Bugged out already
Joined
·
4,086 Posts
Other than the low information voter he is buying from massive spending, what is his base? It hard to imagine the “woke” crowd would get behind him. Certainly the commie socialist would find his billions repulsive.

Or is it truly Trump derangement syndrome where it’s anyone but Trump?
 

·
Proud American Patriot
Joined
·
2,401 Posts
Michael Bloomturd is well known to be as anti-gun as the Ku Klux Klan is racist. Such a conspicuous hatred of freedom makes up for being the rich white man liberal cattle have been programmed to hate. So the one they demonize most might indeed become the standard bearer for the party of anti-capitalist racists.

And you can be sure liberal cattle will trample over each other getting in line to vote for him.

His racist statements will not be held against him in liberal land and neither will his poor treatment of women. These things are only used against patriots. Bloomberg has a reputation as a ruthless, absolutely committed enemy of freedom, and that's what liberal cattle vote for. Remember how much they love Bill Clinton (and by the way, if Bill Clinton ever hands you a cigar, don't take it).

One big thing about the alleged mistreatment of women by Trump because of his locker-room style talk about grabbing women in a certain place is that the whole point to what he was saying was that the women would allow him to do it. It sounded to me like he was giving an extreme example of one of the perks of being rich and famous. So if the women allow it, what he claimed to have done does not constitute mistreatment. It can be called vulgar and sinful and various other things, but if he has their tacit permission, it's not mistreatment.

There have been times in my life when I was a perfect gentleman and somehow women didn't seem that interested in me, but the guys that act the way Trump described ended up with all the girlfriends. Some men are rude toward women just so they can get a date. When I stopped being such a gentleman I had no problem getting girlfriends.
 

·
D. Gibbons is a bad man
Joined
·
5,720 Posts

·
Live Secret, Live Happy
Joined
·
15,813 Posts
The OP might want to edit the thread title to read, "Bloomberg Just Lost the Womens Vote".
This should be the end of Mini Mike. The might love his money, but no Dem will want to get close to that.
 
1 - 11 of 11 Posts
Top