[bonegunner]

The 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals in NY, has ruled Trump can withhhold grant money from sanctuary cities, who fail to co-operate with federal immigration
authorities.

Another Trump Win!:thumb:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/court-hands-trump-win-in-sanctuary-city-grant

 

[Ghost863]

The 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals in NY, has ruled Trump can withhhold grant money from sanctuary cities, who fail to co-operate with federal immigration
authorities.

Another Trump Win!:thumb:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/court-hands-trump-win-in-sanctuary-city-grant

Not trying to rain on anyone's parade but is it really a win? The next democrat Poser also known as a president, could just as well withhold funds from 2A sanctuary cities, towns or counties.

 

[justin22885]

Not trying to rain on anyone's parade but is it really a win? The next democrat Poser also known as a president, could just as well withhold funds from 2A sanctuary cities, towns or counties.

the 2A is a right, living in the US isnt, these things are not the same.. what there needs to be are some SC challenges to assault weapons bans and magazine limits

 

[hoplite59]

the 2A is a right, living in the US isnt, these things are not the same.. what there needs to be are some SC challenges to assault weapons bans and magazine limits

Exactly. They are VIOLATING Federal LAWS ! 2A Sanctuary declarations only emphasize the fact that 2A is a GOD given RIGHT of all Americans. As someone else said in another thread, The USA is one big 2A Sanctuary for heaven's sake !

 

[Ghost863]

the 2A is a right, living in the US isnt, these things are not the same.. what there needs to be are some SC challenges to assault weapons bans and magazine limits

while I agree with you, that does not stop the left from doing what they want to do.

 

[ManyFeathers]

Not trying to rain on anyone's parade but is it really a win? The next democrat Poser also known as a president, could just as well withhold funds from 2A sanctuary cities, towns or counties.

Well he could try at his own peril

I do believe there's more people with guns than people who want sanctuary cities

The next Dem POTUS will have a lot of Trump appointed judges to go through in the Federal courts too, not counting SCOTUS


Aside from that:

This is great news!

 

[bonegunner]

A local govt. disobeying federal law, is much different than protecting a constitutional right.

Apples and oranges.

 

[slackercruster]

Trump should of formed a national volunteer militia 1st week in office and sent them to the sanctuary cities to export the illegals. If some eggs gets cracks, that is fine too. A good sign you are an illegal is no habla inglés

America will be lost to Mexico soon. CA and NYC can control the vote. Mexico controls the vote in CA. Just a matter of time...all do to cheap labor and greed.

 

[hoplite59]

Trump should of formed a national volunteer militia 1st week in office and sent them to the sanctuary cities to export the illegals. If some eggs gets cracks, that is fine too. A good sign you are an illegal is no habla inglés

America will be lost to Mexico soon. CA and NYC can control the vote. Mexico controls the vote in CA. Just a matter of time...all do to cheap labor and greed.

Its never too late. He should empower the State militias anyway.

 

[roseman]

And from a court in NY. Cuomo jr must be having a fit.

 

[hoplite59]

And from a court in NY. Cuomo jr must be having a fit.

I love it ! Cherry on top.

 

[jimdc]

Not trying to rain on anyone's parade but is it really a win? The next democrat Poser also known as a president, could just as well withhold funds from 2A sanctuary cities, towns or counties.

with who the democrats are putting up i think it will be a long, long, long time before a democrat becomes president. i think trump jr. or ivanka as 46. some people think mike obama would be good so how about melania. shes way smarter and alot better looking than mike.[and doesnt show a bulge in a tight dress.]

 

[4X4]

The 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals in NY, has ruled Trump can withhhold grant money from sanctuary cities, who fail to co-operate with federal immigration
authorities.

Another Trump Win!:thumb:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/court-hands-trump-win-in-sanctuary-city-grant

While this is fantastic news, I would like to know what could or could not fall under grant money? For instance does something like Federal roadway money fall under that? I know many state law enforcement agencies rely on federal grant money for training and equipment. I'm also curious to see what kinds of games like that clown in CA, Newsom would try to pull to move federal grant money around that is ear marked for one thing but magically gets diverted?

 

[bonegunner]

While this is fantastic news, I would like to know what could or could not fall under grant money? For instance does something like Federal roadway money fall under that? I know many state law enforcement agencies rely on federal grant money for training and equipment. I'm also curious to see what kinds of games like that clown in CA, Newsom would try to pull to move federal grant money around that is ear marked for one thing but magically gets diverted?

The grant money being withheld is for law enforcement purposes.

This is probably a categorical grant, and must be used for law enforcement purposes.

In grant applications, the applicant has to outline how the money they are seeking will be spent.

If that money is used for other purposes, it would violate the terms of the grant.

A block grant on the other hand, is for general purposes, and may be used as the state sees fit.

 

[Lakota]

Not trying to rain on anyone's parade but is it really a win? The next democrat Poser also known as a president, could just as well withhold funds from 2A sanctuary cities, towns or counties.

I dare them to try. What's good for the goose is good for the gander. We grow the food. We mine the coal. We pump the oil. Balkanization favors rural patriots. I don't think they really want to go there.

 

[ForgedInTheFlame]

Well he could try at his own peril

I do believe there's more people with guns than people who want sanctuary cities

The next Dem POTUS will have a lot of Trump appointed judges to go through in the Federal courts too, not counting SCOTUS


Aside from that:

This is great news!

People with guns is a poor barometer.

We all know most of those people wont lift a damn finger and will be in denial of anything going on until it is far too late. Let's stop pretending Every citizen with a gun will fight. Most won't.

And this thread has been off topic since the 3rd post. The 2A doesn't really have anything to do with the thead title. Thanks ghost for derailing. Sarcasm.

This is (several days old) news isn't it? I saw the decision on Twitter days ago.

Sent from my Note 8 using Tapatalk

 

[ManyFeathers]

People with guns is a poor barometer.

We all know most of those people wont lift a damn finger and will be in denial of anything going on until it is far too late. Let's stop pretending Every citizen with a gun will fight. Most won't.

And this thread has been off topic since the 3rd post. The 2A doesn't really have anything to do with the thead title. Thanks ghost for derailing. Sarcasm.

This is (several days old) news isn't it? I saw the decision on Twitter days ago.

Sent from my Note 8 using Tapatalk

Are you saying the 2nd Amendment rally in Virginia had no effect?

I think when it comes to elimination of amendments in the Bill of Rights, the people will rise to the occasion even if it's not 100% participation

The people that do rally to the cause, also vote. Politicians seem to seek middle ground once they find out they are disparaging their own constituents or the next guy is elected in their place

Trump after all, was elected for a reason and you cannot discount that!


If you'll look, my reply was to Ghost and not the OP.....just sayin'

 

[justin22885]

while I agree with you, that does not stop the left from doing what they want to do.

Well, for the most part it's republicans letting the left do whatever they want. They had two years of holding the house, senate, and presidency that they could have passed legislation against these things, closed the border, got their wall, got rid of obamacare, reversed gun control, and all sorts of crap they like to run on every election. But they did nothing.

 

[ForgedInTheFlame]

Are you saying the 2nd Amendment rally in Virginia had no effect?

I think when it comes to elimination of amendments in the Bill of Rights, the people will rise to the occasion even if it's not 100% participation

The people that do rally to the cause, also vote. Politicians seem to seek middle ground once they find out they are disparaging their own constituents or the next guy is elected in their place

Trump after all, was elected for a reason and you cannot discount that!


If you'll look, my reply was to Ghost and not the OP.....just sayin'

What I'm saying is, (as an example) 1/10 people will actually bite, not just bark.

The 3% are the 3% for a reason, and they believe what I do, the overwhelming majority is all talk and no stones.

So saying stuff like "well x million people have guns" doesn't hold much weight when we haven't parsed out the fudds, socialists, and flat out *******.

Sent from my Note 8 using Tapatalk

 

[ManyFeathers]

What I'm saying is, (as an example) 1/10 people will actually bite, not just bark.

The 3% are the 3% for a reason, and they believe what I do, the overwhelming majority is all talk and no stones.

So saying stuff like "well x million people have guns" doesn't hold much weight when we haven't parsed out the fudds, socialists, and flat out *******.

Sent from my Note 8 using Tapatalk

I don't necessarily disagree with what you're saying but.....

I was referring to those that VOTE, not run around showing off their arms

Again, my reply was to Ghost, I left out the part about "voting" and the amount of those with guns out number the ones that want sanctuary cities for illegals as a voting bloc, I thought it was somewhat implied but I see not everyone comprehended that.....my bad

You kind of cherry picked my quote to someone else