I'm getting ready to move to Wisconsin and I'm planning on deer hunting this year. I can only afford to buy one long gun prior to hunting season. If anyone has any advice on why one would be better than the other, please let me know. Here are the three I'm considering:
Remington 870: I can pick one up for about $350, I can use it for pheasant hunting and home defense as well.
Ruger Mini Thirty: More expensive but I feel more comfortable taking down a deer with a rifle. Short enough overall length to use in the brush or home defense.
Remington 783 30-06: Cheaper than the Mini Thirty, comes with a scope, and I could use it for hunting big game out west. Not so great for home defense.
I'd appreciate any good advice on this, thanks.
Remington 870: I can pick one up for about $350, I can use it for pheasant hunting and home defense as well.
Ruger Mini Thirty: More expensive but I feel more comfortable taking down a deer with a rifle. Short enough overall length to use in the brush or home defense.
Remington 783 30-06: Cheaper than the Mini Thirty, comes with a scope, and I could use it for hunting big game out west. Not so great for home defense.
I'd appreciate any good advice on this, thanks.