Survivalist Forum banner

9mm opinions

18K views 175 replies 106 participants last post by  chaplainjack  
#1 ·
This year I turn 40 and informed my wife that since I have never had a 9mm I want one for my birthday. My top 2 choices are the Glock 34 or the Springfield XD 9 Tactical (5"), since it won't be a ccw gun I see no need for anything compact. I carried the Beretta M9 in the Corps but I'm not a fan. As a range / home defense weapon it is great but I have my own issues with it as a true field pistol. My son recently inherited a S&W 459 which is a sweet shooting 9, but that is his. I have worked in a gun store before and I know how most of the popular guns feel in my hand. I would like to hear pros and cons of you guys and gals experiences with different models. Please don't start a caliber debate. At this point I'm only intrested in 9mm.
 
#2 ·
I carried a G17 gen 2 on duty for the last 15 years I worked as a LEO. 34 is a shade bigger but since you're not looking for concealed carry I have only pro comments on the Glock. I now carry a G17 gen 4 for CCW retired. I'm a big guy I can pull it off. My 17 gen 2 has fired 10's of thousands of rounds in qualifications, hobby, competition and never had a FTF or FTE. What more can you want out of your weapon?
 
#5 ·
I would suggest going with the one that feels most natural and comfortable in your hand(s). Both are solidly performing, rated and reliable. A Glock does not do you full justice if your one of the minority percentage that does not like the angle of the grip or its grip angle affects your accuracy (yes yes yes I know this can be overcome with hours of range time and hundreds of $$$ in ammo practicing).
 
#106 ·
A Glock does not do you full justice if your one of the minority percentage that does not like the angle of the grip.
I thought I wanted a Glock but HATED the grip.

Went with a Ruger SR9C instead and absolutely love it. Comfortable grip, aims naturally, nice trigger pull, very obvious chamber loaded flag on top, and Ruger customer service is the best in the industry. Plus the grip can be instantly shortened for concealed carry with a 10 round mag or used for HD with the 17 round. I am female so that might be why I prefer this grip to the Glock (I really hated the Glock grip).

Image
 
#15 ·
with the P226 police trade in's come in all of the time and are like $400 guns.... i've seen them go for as cheap as $300 at one point...

nothing wrong with buying a police trade in for the most part, if your going through a reputable company you should be pretty happy with the wear..

just an option if your really liking the p226...it just happens to be one of those that there's tons of them out there... same with the Beretta 92, another good all steel firearm that can be gotten very cheaply from police/military trade in's.

check into this route....


that said, i honestly would think that you would be doing yourself a major disservice by not looking into the CZ line of pistols, the CZ75 series is one hell of a shooter for the money imo, that would be my personal pick for a new gun, for the money....

that said, if all steel doesn't mean anything to you, then have a look at the glock, great poly gun for the cash and they have a popularity for a reason, it's just one of those things where me and glock grips and POA don't get along, same with alot of people really.. if it fits you and you shoot well with it then the glock would definitely be a top choice...just make sure you shoot it first..

recap:

new pistol:
full steel: CZ75 series
poly: Glock

used pistols
92f
p226

just some options for ya.
 
#12 ·
You can't go wrong with either the Glock or the Springfield. I gave each of my 3 daughters a Springfield XD Sub Compact 9mm fir Christmas this year. I went to the Glock Armor School and they are so simple, rugged and easy to work on, I almost wish I had gone with Glocks. But both are great guns.

By the way,

Howdy,

Welcome to the forum from the California Gold Country.


"Freedom is one of the noblest aspirations of the human spirit"
Ronald Reagan
January 21, 1985
 
#16 ·
Both are good choices. I'm a glock fan, cost of items for them (mags, sights, holsters, ect) are less than the SA, although in 9mm the SA holds 19 rounds, with one in the pipe thats 20 rounds on hand. Nothing to sneeze at.

With the Glock you can get the 33 rounders, almost making this a moot point. I own a 34 and 35, I also feel the sights could be better, possibly just a switch to night sights would do the trick. Good luck!
 
#17 ·
I am a Glock fan who recently purchased an M&P9L because I love the ergonomics of it. The M&P has a few quirks the Glock doesn't (the trigger is bleh compared to the Glock, I hate the little disconnect lever in the magwell to disassemble the gun). I still like my Glocks because they are rock solid and stupid simple to work on, but the feel of the M&P is amazing.

Like nearly everyone else here has said, you really have to hold/try each one to figure out what works for you.
 
#19 ·
Honestly, out of all the guns I would check out the XDm 4.5" in 9mm if that is in your price range. The 5" XD to me is a bit unwieldy but the 4.5" (M) is just right (again for me). I have over 10k rounds through my XDm 9 with somewhere in the range of 4 or 5 trips to Frontsight at 2 to 4 days each and the XDm has been a flawless shooter each time. I haven't run any other pistol that hard save the Glock with similar results.

I do own or have owned an XD 45, an XDm 9, and a few Glocks. Out of everything I shoot the XDm is my go-to gun for training without a doubt. The Glocks are fine shooters but something about the XD platform that just works for me especially with malfunction drills. The big round ambidextrous mag release is positive each time, on my Glock I had to add a Vickers release.

Also if you want to remove some of the classic XD trigger take-up and get a much crisper reset, you could check out the Powder River Precision trigger kit.

Good luck, you won't go wrong with either Glock or XD/XDm
 
#26 ·
I have to add my two cents. Just because.

I'm partial to Browning Hi Powers. You can pick up a gently used one for under $600.

I know, they're not real 'modern' but John Browning's designs can't be faulted even after years of 'safety' features.

Some gunsmith work and a few upgrades to suit your needs and they are superb pistols. And yes, I'm biased mainly because they are the only full sized double-stack 9mm that actually fits my smaller hand.

And nothing against Glocks or any of the other polymer framed pistols some of my best friends own them, they just don't point right for me.
 
#28 ·
I have run most of the guns listed...most pretty good. I have a lot of time with Glock (old duty gun), HK USPC (current duty) and wife's P229 duty gun. I have about 15,000 rounds through my USPC alone in the last 2 years. But, after reading the great reviews and trying the HK VP9, I've switched to it, and I'm very happy with the change. I think the VP9 has without a doubt the best ergonomics of any pistol on the market...similar to the exceptional PPQ, but even better. And, the trigger is as good or better than the trigger on the PPQ. It has a great trigger guard mounted paddle mag release, which is quicker as you don’t have to adjust your grip at all). Bore axis to top of hand is lower than hammer fired guns. It has ambidextrous controls, low felt recoil, great steel mags which drop free quickly, and cost is not bad either. I’m using it to hopefully qualify on the Triple Nickel COF. Lots of great reviews out there with much more detail.


[URL="http://www.gunsholstersandgear.com/gun-reviews/hk-vp9-review/"]http://www.gunsholstersandgear.com/gun-reviews/hk-vp9-review/[/URL]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q8dF17P-ymA