No we should not ignore it. We should just give more attention to radical acts of kindness as shown there.I guess we are suppose to ignore the fact the rest of the tolerant "good guys" was trying to kick a man to death. I do give the woman kudos for heart and courage.
Who I am displaying as haters? Did you read the article? Whose homeland have I offered up for sale? Which side is my side? And to whom am I selling doom?These are random feel-good stories, and anomalies.
Think, that 300 blacks/white schills would come and hope to kill white nationalists.
It's their majority oppressing our minority, or it's our majority oppressing their minority. This is true even after 100 years or so of being endlessly told that universal tolerance is possible.
It's true in South Africa, it's true in Zimbabwe, it was true in Haiti, and it's true here.
Meanwhile, here you are displaying people who want the white phenotype and culture to continue to exist as mindless haters. Tell me, is clamoring for your own slide into irrelevance and eventual extinction "compassion", "love", or "hope"? Is giving up your homeland to others with their own goals and motivations "equality" or "color-blindness"? Jesus said that no man has greater love than he that lays down his life for his friends, and yet here you are selling certain doom for your and your friends' grandchildren and way of life.
If I didn't hold the faith I do, then I might agree with this. However, there has been an awful lot of compassion shown me that I haven't deserved.Let us not forget that there's also such a thing as misplaced compassion.
I tell all that listen to me that I freely acknowledge that my faith could be misplaced. I just sincerely hope not.Yea though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil for the chick named Thomas is with me.
Darwinian rules don't work anymore and we are now suffering the consequences. Loss of resources will eliminate both sides of this equation.
And you believe or doubt other MSM sites as long as they cater to your political leanings?No one should believe something written on the huffington post.
Haha... That story was epic!I always liked this story.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=IqV-egZOS1E
Of course it will! There are much bigger fights to be fought. Mankind, as we know it, is relatively young. Look at our advancements just in the last 200 years vs the previous 2000...This issue is never going to be solved.
I celebrate and admire cultures, "races", and even physical differences amongst our people. As an example, I'm a Japanophile and am greatly interested in many things about Japan's history and culture. I happen to love auburn hair and red freckles on women, etc...Dr Reco said that he hoped that the illusion of race would disappear, I go one step in the opposite direction and say that I hope we will stop villianizing the acceptance of differences between race and culture, and embrace them and value them. The differences are what makes it great. I don't want a One People, all looking alike and of the same mind. How boring would that be? Instead, it should be the goal of our race hating/exploiting nation to accept and celebrate that there are differences in both culture and race. Not divisive differences, but additive ones, that together, make us all better.
Earth is believed to be around 4.5 billion years old. Our current knowledge on hominids is about several million years.How is race an illusion? And "mankind" is not young. African tribes can be traced back 100,000 years, certain Asian tribes 80,000 years. It is only the Adamite tribes (Arabs/hebrews(whites) ) that can only be traced back a couple of thousand, With Adamites going back in the ball park of at the most just shy of 7,000 years and Arabs being not long after that.
You and I are speaking from different schools of thought...scientifically and socially. Biologically there is no genetic basis for race. The original five archaic "parental" race classifications (Caucasoid, *********, *******, American Indian, and Malayan) proposed in the late 1700's have little to any biologically discrete evidence of existence, and science does not claim them. To put it plainly, race as a scientifically identifiable concept, is extremely problematic at best.You have to be pretty blind to not see past the superficial differences in people. There are clearly huge differences in people. If we all started from the same patch of grass, How have some come so much further then others? We are talking a small 8% going significantly further then 92%, That is not superficial that is fact. All these advancements you speak off, look where they came from. And science claims there are 3 types of people, Caucasoid, ********** and Negroids. And no, These are not derogatory or demeaning terms.
Treating everyone as equals sets people up for failure. Expecting a 45 lb 3 foot child to jump 6 feet in the air is unrealistic, as is expecting a 350lb man to fit into a fox hole. When society come to realize this and fluctuates its expectations for people on all levels society may be able to work better.
You forgot to include the right leaning media. While much of media is "lying propaganda", sometimes they actually report the news...(as in reporting what actually happened). It's ok to listen outside of the echo chamber every once in awhile.The progress fascist news media aka ABC, CBS, NBC, PBS, CNN, MSNBC, NYT, LAT, Huffington Post, etc are lying propagandists who work for the progressive fascist cause. Everything that they do is designed to help the progressive fascist cause. You really can't consider them reporters of the news anymore than Gobbells.
That is entirely superficial. Ask any of those same pathologists to identify "race" through DNA, and things will become a lot more problematic. Biologically, humans are classified under one race (**** sapiens). This is not my opinion. There is no genetic basis for race. Race is a social construct, and a lot of beliefs about race came about due to pseudoscience and propaganda. This is a really important thing to understand.While I agree that there in is no inherent "superiority/inferiority" between races, to say that there are no races is actually wrong. Ask any forensic pathologist how they identify people from skeletal remains and he/she will discuss skull shape, supraorbital process and foramen, teeth, etc.
It depends on why someone is opposed to people of different skin colors marrying in the first place. One would be hard pressed to find a reason other than some misguided belief about skin tone to disagree with such a marriage.You forget, for decades anyone who disagreed with interracial marriage was called a racist.
