32 Caliber is The Best for CCW (For Me[For Now]) - Survivalist Forum
Survivalist Forum

Advertise Here

Go Back   Survivalist Forum > > >
Articles Classifieds Donations Gallery Groups Links Store Survival Files


Notices

Advertise Here
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-15-2019, 01:10 PM
Bobcat In The Woods Bobcat In The Woods is offline
Just One More Gun
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Eastern Montana
Posts: 385
Thanks: 49
Thanked 663 Times in 240 Posts
Default 32 Caliber is The Best for CCW (For Me[For Now])



Advertise Here

Afternoon all.

Now that I have your attention, there are a few things I want to get out of the way.
1) I didn't get rid of my 9mm, and my full size Beretta is still my SHTF/fun at the range/OWB gun. I personally believe 9mm is the best SHTF handgun caliber, not anything 32.
2) I'm not going to claim that my choice to switch my EDC to 32 caliber handguns is a good choice for everyone.
3) 32acp is not "just as good" as any standard carry caliber (22lr/25acp being excepted).

Okay, now with that taken care of, here's the deal:

I have a new job that is less than friendly with carrying a firearm. There's no direct policy saying you can't, but it is pretty heavily frowned on. It's also fairly physical. Those, coupled with it being summer, kind of rule out my Beretta 92 as an EDC.
My original plan had been to just grab an LCP for pocket carry and be done with it - until the last 24 hours.

My girlfriend is not a gun person. She's not anti-gun: she enjoys going to the range and watching me shoot, or to the gunshop to drool over expensive 1911s, she just doesn't care to shoot herself.
But last night while I was over at her place after dinner, I happened to be scrolling through my phone, and a picture of a Charter Arms Undercoverette in purple came up. Her immediate response was "Oo, I might shoot that one." Which was music to my ears.
So we had a bit of a discussion about guns and calibers and CCW, and watched some Lucky Gunner videos, and decided that I'm going to buy one for her in the next couple months, in 32 H&R Magnum.

But why the 32 over the 38? Well, part of why she doesn't want to shoot much is recoil. She's recoil-shy. So 38 Special, even with lightly loaded wadcutters is kind of stiff in a lightweight revolver.

By comparison, 32 H&R is pretty tame, and can also shoot 32 S&W long/short, and 32 ACP (I'm going to come back to this last point in a minute) for lighter recoil practice. Also, the 32 holds 6 instead of 5 rounds, which for someone who frankly isn't going to practice a lot with their gun, nor is likely to carry a reload, could come in handy.

Now, how does this change my carry options? Well, I had the opportunity to shoot an LCP this morning, and the experience was...not what I'd hoped. I liked the size and feel of the gun, but by the end of the first magazine it wasn't fun anymore. Call me a sissy, but 380 was too much cartridge in that little thing for me. I want to practice with it a lot, and get some semblance of proficiency. I wouldn't be able to do that with the LCP.

So I like the size/weight and feel of the LCP, but not the caliber. Well, Kel-Tec has a solution in the shape of the P32, which is virtually identical, but in 32ACP. It also carries 1 more round than the LCP, and has a last round hold open (I like that). And the frosting on the cake, I can just bring 32ACP to the range for plinking, trigger control/sight picture work, etc. This is helpful because 32ACP is a lot cheaper around here than 32 S&W or 32 H&R ($17/50 vs $30/50 and $24/20).

The Caliber Wars crowd is going to chime in now, talking about ballistics jello, underpowered cartridges, "what-ifs," etc. And here's my answer to them: I don't care. We can have a discussion on tactics and power ratings later. Right now, the 32 in my pocket is infinitely better than the 9mm under lock and key in my truck.

So there we go. For me, at this point in time, 32 caliber pistols make a lot of sense.
Quick reply to this message
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Bobcat In The Woods For This Useful Post:
Old 06-15-2019, 01:38 PM
charliemeyer007's Avatar
charliemeyer007 charliemeyer007 is offline
reluctant sinner
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Rent Free in your head
Posts: 13,374
Thanks: 33
Thanked 22,408 Times in 8,384 Posts
Default

The pistol you have with you is way better than the one in the car, which is better than the one at home.

A 32 ACP with good bullets could work if you can place them in good spots. 32 S&W is like throwing rocks IMHO.
Quick reply to this message
The Following User Says Thank You to charliemeyer007 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-15-2019, 01:51 PM
AK103K's Avatar
AK103K AK103K is offline
What?
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: In the shadow of the Shade.
Posts: 6,339
Thanks: 6,247
Thanked 10,443 Times in 4,255 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobcat In The Woods View Post
I have a new job that is less than friendly with carrying a firearm. There's no direct policy saying you can't, but it is pretty heavily frowned on. It's also fairly physical. Those, coupled with it being summer, kind of rule out my Beretta 92 as an EDC.
It sounds like we work in similar circumstances. Our company does have a no firearms policy, as did most other places Ive ever worked. I think thats more the lawyers covering everyone's ass type thing, but whatever. We work in a number of places that tend to restrict that sort of thing too. Our work is usually, hard, physical work, outdoors, for 10-12 hours on a short day.

Due to the NPE thing, I normally wear my Glock 26 with a reload in my Smart Carry while actually working, and leave my 17 in the car. If the weather is cooler, and Im wearing a sweatshirt and/or bibs, then Ill often just wear the 17 AIWB.

I used to carry my Seecamp as the BUG, until I realized I could carry the 26 with its reload, in the same type holster, with no problem. That was the last time I carried the Seecamp.

Everyone needs to do what they are most comfortable with doing. I just think a lot of people dont understand, that they dont have to go to a minimalist gun, simply because they cant carry as they normally would, for a larger gun.

We have so many more choices these days, in both guns and gear, that a reasonable and realistic compromise, should not be any problem.
Quick reply to this message
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to AK103K For This Useful Post:
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 06-15-2019, 02:58 PM
PalmettoTree PalmettoTree is online now
Survivor
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 12,177
Thanks: 2,412
Thanked 16,284 Times in 6,865 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobcat In The Woods View Post
Afternoon all.

So there we go. For me, at this point in time, 32 caliber pistols make a lot of sense.
Sounds good to me. IMO the gun must fit the shooter. Sounds to me like you touched all the bases to be considered.
Quick reply to this message
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to PalmettoTree For This Useful Post:
Old 06-16-2019, 01:09 PM
SHTF MAN's Avatar
SHTF MAN SHTF MAN is online now
Prepared
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 293
Thanks: 432
Thanked 224 Times in 125 Posts
Default

I can sympathize with this decision. When I was looking for a BUG or a deep conceal gun I went through the same line of thought... pocket 380 and call it a day. But beyond feeling a little snappy it could also cause the limp wristing failure to feed malfunction. This is something I experienced in my wife's ccw choice which was a pocket 380 at the time. When I shot it it did fine but she would have a few malfunctions. After doing a bit of research I found that if you dont hold it firm through the recoil then it could be robbed of enough energy that it would not cycle the next round, causing a FTF. She eventually got rid of it and got a Walther PK380..still a 380 but much better grip and ergos. I highly recommend this for people that are recoil sensitive or have trouble racking the slide on an auto loader.
So when it came time to think about a BUG for myself I thought about the 380, but decided to check out a Keltec P-32. It feels very similar to the LCP, but holds one more round (as mentioned by the OP). I liked it enough to buy it for a few reasons.
1. The extra round in the mag vs LCP
2. Less snap due to being slightly smaller caliber
3. Availability of an extended grip 10 round mag.
However, the deciding factor for me to go with the P-32 was the ammo selection.
380 Auto ammo is known for not being reliable in terms of JHP actually expanding. So there is the choice of should I go with more expensive JHP and hope it expands as it should or go with FMJ knowing it will not expand but should have sufficient penetration if placed where it needs to be. Well, that was a bit of a hard decision. With my wife's gun it has a 3.6in barrel and gets 380 rounds to perform better than pocket 380s, but in a really short barrel the results can be poor. So that led me to think about ammo choices in 32 acp. The same principles apply here.. short barrel, reduced velocity and expansion would likely be questionable at best. So I narrowed it down to two ammo choices.
1. Fiocchi JHP
2. Magtech LRN (Lead round nose)

The Fiocchi ammo was light and fast @ around 1100 fps but I think only 60gr. It might expand at that speed but I doubt the penetration would be enough to reliably stop a threat.
So that left the LRN magtech. Less expensive, but with that lead nose it made me think of how lead is rather soft and may very well mushroom a bit when impacting tissue, yet not expand to the point where it slows the projectile enough to stop it short of hitting anything important. Also with the round being a bit underpowered the over penetration risk is probably minimal. I could not find any similar ammo in 380 auto.
So with all things considered I went with a Keltec P-32 as my BUG/deep conceal weapon.
This however comes with a caveat...
I think the ammo choices (with LRN being the winner to me) make the 32acp a decent choice for the application, the platform however was not the best choice. I owned two P-32s. The first was used and a little beat up so I traded for a new one. The new one was great at the range and in my pocket until one day I came home from work and took it out of my pocket only to hear a rattling in the gun. Turned out to be a broken hammer spring (I think). Sent it to get repaired and got it back in about two weeks, but I never trusted it after that.
I'm now still looking for another BUG but think it may just be a 380 due to better manufacturing of the platforms. For what it's worth I also thought the P32 would be good because it was carried in my weak hand front pocket and that hand has been broken a few times so 32 might be easier to shoot too.
OP, the 32 definitely has a spot but make sure it is reliable enough to trust with your life and check it regularly especially if you shoot it a good amount. I don't think they are made as range toys but especially with the 10rd extended mags it can be fun to shoot. YMMV.
Quick reply to this message
Old 06-16-2019, 01:30 PM
hatchet jack's Avatar
hatchet jack hatchet jack is offline
Hiker
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: South of Dallas
Posts: 636
Thanks: 772
Thanked 897 Times in 400 Posts
Default

Quote:
So I like the size/weight and feel of the LCP, but not the caliber. Well, Kel-Tec has a solution in the shape of the P32, which is virtually identical, but in 32ACP. It also carries 1 more round than the LCP, and has a last round hold open (I like that). And the frosting on the cake, I can just bring 32ACP to the range for plinking, trigger control/sight picture work, etc. This is helpful because 32ACP is a lot cheaper around here than 32 S&W or 32 H&R ($17/50 vs $30/50 and $24/20).
I have already tried the 32acp in a revolver thing. You can do that if you don't expect much in the way of accuracy. But it will go bang and make noise. But so will firecrackers and they are even cheaper.

If you want a 32 caliber revolver then plan on shooting ammo designed to fit in it. Not some sloppy fitting too short case with an undersized bullet. If you want your girlfriend to have fun shooting and get the thrill of shooting and hitting the target then plan on buying the correct ammunition for the gun.

I shoot a lot of 32 and if I bought factory ammo it would be pricey. But I cast most of the bullets I shoot and reload my own ammo. I can shoot for about the price of 22lr ammo.
Quick reply to this message
The Following User Says Thank You to hatchet jack For This Useful Post:
Old 06-16-2019, 02:55 PM
0002S's Avatar
0002S 0002S is offline
μολὼν λαβέ
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 2,903
Thanks: 2,294
Thanked 3,856 Times in 1,605 Posts
Default

Get what ever she has confidence in and can shoot accurately. Better to be carried, with one in the chamber and hit your mark, than sitting in the center consul in the car.
Quick reply to this message
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to 0002S For This Useful Post:
Old 06-16-2019, 05:38 PM
SheepDog68's Avatar
SheepDog68 SheepDog68 is offline
Hunter
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: WV
Posts: 1,588
Thanks: 32
Thanked 1,896 Times in 902 Posts
Talking

The .32 caliber historically has been very popular! I believe that there is/was a reason for that!

Yes it’s not as impressive as the larger ones, but it saw a lot of folks through a time exponentially more dangerous than today!

SD
Quick reply to this message
The Following User Says Thank You to SheepDog68 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-16-2019, 09:10 PM
justin22885 justin22885 is offline
Awesome
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 14,327
Thanks: 0
Thanked 22,010 Times in 7,331 Posts
Default

the .32 gets underestimated.. greatly.. it gets lumped into the same category as 22 and 25 erroneously.. the 32 can do out of a pistol what it takes those two a full on rifle to achieve.. fact is, the 32acp is comparable to the .380acp and there is a reason for this

we started out with .32acp guns, .32acp has a CIP pressure of 23,000 (20,500 for saami and why US ammo is weaker, and likely to blame for some of the bad rep). when 380 was designed though, it was designed to utilize existing 32acp guns and was designed on one.. this meant that the .380ACP had to meet some of the limitations of a .32acp gun, meaning the same amount of blowback forces as .32acp by reducing pressure to compensate for the greater surface area at the bottom of the inside of the case, but also making it rimless, so that the .380 would share roughly the same rim diameter as the .32 meaning they didnt really need new extractors or a larger breech section milled out for the cartridge, nor a larger magwell

so, proper spec 32acp ammo is pretty close to the capabilities of .32, and far, FAR above and beyond anything a .25 could hope to achieve.. and consider this.. consider you can get bullet weights similar to a .380 at roughly the same 1,050fps velocity, the 32acp carrying that weight in a smaller diameter projectile is going to translate into penetrating as well, if not a little better

but another thing i like about .32acp though is the collectable factor of it.. there is so much variety in .32 cal guns from the first half of the 20th century, most of it still affordable, most .380 options are civilian only options, and usually from the later half.. it was just never as popular as the 32 until fairly recently
Quick reply to this message
The Following User Says Thank You to justin22885 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-16-2019, 09:15 PM
ksmedman's Avatar
ksmedman ksmedman is offline
Dunning-Kruger Survivor
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 6,834
Thanks: 10,894
Thanked 19,384 Times in 5,029 Posts
Default

I'm a 32ACP fan, have numerous pistols in the caliber.
That said, if it's a J-frame sized weapon, I'd want a 327Fed or 38spl.

You know what's incredibly easy to carry? A KelTec P32. Cheap too.
I carry one in scrubs... think about that.
Plus, I get 8 rounds vs. 6? in a revolver.
__________________
“There is all the difference in the world between treating people equally, and attempting to make them equal.” – Frederich Hayek
Quick reply to this message
The Following User Says Thank You to ksmedman For This Useful Post:
Old 06-16-2019, 09:55 PM
justin22885 justin22885 is offline
Awesome
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 14,327
Thanks: 0
Thanked 22,010 Times in 7,331 Posts
Default

i wish there were better modern carry options for a .32 than a crummy keltec though
Quick reply to this message
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to justin22885 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-16-2019, 10:55 PM
Hick Industries's Avatar
Hick Industries Hick Industries is offline
Live Secret, Live Happy
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Eastern Oklahoma
Posts: 13,892
Thanks: 17,255
Thanked 33,440 Times in 9,423 Posts
Default

Im confused.
You started out talking about the 32 HR mag, which is a decent (but obscure) revolver round.
Then jumper to 32 ACP pistols, which are significantly less effective.

I have owned a Ruger SP101 in 32 HR for a couple decades. It makes sense for folks who hand load their ammo. If you dont hand load, buy a revolver chambered in 38 sp or a pistol in 9mm.
Quick reply to this message
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Hick Industries For This Useful Post:
Old 06-17-2019, 12:25 AM
Bobcat In The Woods Bobcat In The Woods is offline
Just One More Gun
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Eastern Montana
Posts: 385
Thanks: 49
Thanked 663 Times in 240 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hick Industries View Post
Im confused.
You started out talking about the 32 HR mag, which is a decent (but obscure) revolver round.
Then jumper to 32 ACP pistols, which are significantly less effective.

I have owned a Ruger SP101 in 32 HR for a couple decades. It makes sense for folks who hand load their ammo. If you dont hand load, buy a revolver chambered in 38 sp or a pistol in 9mm.
The revolver is for the girlfriend, who is recoil shy. The auto is for me to pocket carry, because I have small pockets and don't like the recoil similarly-sized 380s produce. For myself, I would rather be proficient with a 32 than unpracticed with a 380. Also, I prefer autoloaders, but that's a discussion for another day.

And I do handload, so ammo isn't a huge issue.
Quick reply to this message
The Following User Says Thank You to Bobcat In The Woods For This Useful Post:
Old 06-17-2019, 05:30 AM
SheepDog68's Avatar
SheepDog68 SheepDog68 is offline
Hunter
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: WV
Posts: 1,588
Thanks: 32
Thanked 1,896 Times in 902 Posts
Default

Double Post!

SD
Quick reply to this message
Old 06-17-2019, 05:31 AM
SheepDog68's Avatar
SheepDog68 SheepDog68 is offline
Hunter
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: WV
Posts: 1,588
Thanks: 32
Thanked 1,896 Times in 902 Posts
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by justin22885 View Post
i wish there were better modern carry options for a .32 than a crummy keltec though
Seecamp, Beretta Tomcat, Walther PP/PPK ect!

SD
Quick reply to this message
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to SheepDog68 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-17-2019, 05:50 AM
Klbsa Klbsa is offline
Adventurer
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 644
Thanks: 104
Thanked 1,289 Times in 385 Posts
Default

Lol @ the reaction to the LCP. I had the same feeling when I shot mine the first time. So I was resolved to getting used to it. I shoot my lcp more than any other gun I own....... Now I’m used to it and can almost hit the broad side of a barn with it.
Quick reply to this message
Old 06-17-2019, 06:22 AM
EchoMirage's Avatar
EchoMirage EchoMirage is offline
HMFIC
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: SE VA
Posts: 993
Thanks: 3,785
Thanked 1,625 Times in 615 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SheepDog68 View Post
Seecamp, Beretta Tomcat, Walther PP/PPK ect!

SD

I can't think of a better 32 then the Beretta Tomcat. Get an inox widebody, and it's the last 32 you'll ever buy. If the ammo was cheaper, and I could find a Tomcat for a good price, I'd snap it up in a heartbeat.
Quick reply to this message
Old 06-17-2019, 06:23 AM
EchoMirage's Avatar
EchoMirage EchoMirage is offline
HMFIC
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: SE VA
Posts: 993
Thanks: 3,785
Thanked 1,625 Times in 615 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobcat In The Woods View Post
The Caliber Wars crowd is going to chime in now, talking about ballistics jello, underpowered cartridges, "what-ifs," etc. And here's my answer to them: I don't care. We can have a discussion on tactics and power ratings later. Right now, the 32 in my pocket is infinitely better than the 9mm under lock and key in my truck.

The 25 in your pocket is better than the 45 at home. Carrying ANYTHING is better than carrying nothing.
Quick reply to this message
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to EchoMirage For This Useful Post:
Old 06-17-2019, 07:27 AM
Late2Prep Late2Prep is offline
Pusher of brooms
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: SW WY
Posts: 380
Thanks: 540
Thanked 598 Times in 248 Posts
Default

Had one of the Manurhin (Walther) PP's .32's back when they were first surplused out of some French or German police agency. Had a friend cut in an MMC adjustable rear sight.
Talk about a civilized pistol, easy to shoot, surprisingly accurate with good handloads, I let it escape for something with bigger bullets but a lot less class.

Somewhere around here there's a CZ50 in pieces, it just doesn't have the same class as the PP.

I have been looking for a good little pocket gun, and several are appealing for various reasons, the Kel-Tec because of the price, the Tomcat because of the quality, but what stands out with most of the options is a short lifetime. A couple thousand rounds and they are worn out or malfunctioning.

And I like to practice with what I carry, a thousand rounds may only be 10 range trips. So a truly small choice may not be a real option.

Why can't someone make a decent to high quality pocket gun that will last, has sights that you can see, and is accurate?
Quick reply to this message
The Following User Says Thank You to Late2Prep For This Useful Post:
Old 06-17-2019, 07:35 AM
JDH's Avatar
JDH JDH is offline
Si vis pacem, para bellum
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 6,339
Thanks: 649
Thanked 9,759 Times in 3,752 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EchoMirage View Post
and I could find a Tomcat
You could have stopped there. I haven't seen a new or used one for sale in a very long time.
Quick reply to this message
Reply

Bookmarks



Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Survivalist Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:
Gender
Insurance
Please select your insurance company (Optional)

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright © Kevin Felts 2006 - 2015,
Green theme by http://www.themesbydesign.net