Kavanaugh hearing - Page 222 - Survivalist Forum
Survivalist Forum

Advertise Here

Go Back   Survivalist Forum > >
Articles Classifieds Donations Gallery Groups Links Store Survival Files


Notices

Advertise Here
Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ACLU, ABA on Judge Kavanaugh Mr. Sockpuppet Political News and Discussion 8 07-14-2018 11:07 AM
Mack?s Hearing Protection New Products at the 2018 SHOT Show AllOutdoor.com AllOutdoor.com 0 02-02-2018 11:00 PM
Another tool for suvival Elessar General Discussion 1 06-20-2017 09:52 AM
Hearing damage and truth on ear protection sixtus Health, Fitness and First Aid 22 05-21-2017 11:04 AM
Hearing Protection with Comms Delvan Communications 12 03-20-2017 11:10 PM

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-16-2019, 05:25 PM
clocker's Avatar
clocker clocker is offline
Survivor
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 7,667
Thanks: 73,692
Thanked 31,242 Times in 6,711 Posts
Default



Advertise Here

Even though President Trump tweeted that Justice Kavanaugh (love those office titles; must rankle the Left to even see them... ) should sue these bastard, lie-mongers, it may well be a poisoned pill. Should Kav go after these liars, he would likely have to recuse himself in any cases that come before the SCOTUS involving the Clintons since Stiers is/was the lawyer of the Clintons.

"It's a trap!" -- Adm. Ackbar's most famous line, RotJ.
Quick reply to this message
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to clocker For This Useful Post:
Old 09-16-2019, 07:42 PM
Explainist Explainist is offline
Hunter
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,595
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3,258 Times in 1,026 Posts
Default

I say we start a movement: Impeach Kamala Harris
Quick reply to this message
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Explainist For This Useful Post:
Old 09-16-2019, 07:45 PM
Jim in Illinois's Avatar
Jim in Illinois Jim in Illinois is offline
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: west frankfort, il
Posts: 1,708
Thanks: 17,064
Thanked 4,865 Times in 1,230 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by clocker View Post
Even though President Trump tweeted that Justice Kavanaugh (love those office titles; must rankle the Left to even see them... ) should sue these bastard, lie-mongers, it may well be a poisoned pill. Should Kav go after these liars, he would likely have to recuse himself in any cases that come before the SCOTUS involving the Clintons since Stiers is/was the lawyer of the Clintons.

"It's a trap!" -- Adm. Ackbar's most famous line, RotJ.


Justices never have to recuse them self's they can and sometimes do but their is no requirement that forces them.
Quick reply to this message
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jim in Illinois For This Useful Post:
Old 09-16-2019, 08:16 PM
Lagnar's Avatar
Lagnar Lagnar is offline
Retired kafir
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Utah
Posts: 13,068
Thanks: 23,636
Thanked 46,753 Times in 10,885 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by franklin View Post
(Speaking of Chihuahua, where is Debbi these days?
Fugly as ever. The words rode hard and put away wet come to mind.



Last we heard from her she was being bitch-slapped by former ICE director Tom Homan
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	schultz.jpg
Views:	140
Size:	38.4 KB
ID:	291856  
Quick reply to this message
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Lagnar For This Useful Post:
Old 09-16-2019, 08:32 PM
Lagnar's Avatar
Lagnar Lagnar is offline
Retired kafir
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Utah
Posts: 13,068
Thanks: 23,636
Thanked 46,753 Times in 10,885 Posts
Default

This what I saw tonight on the cbs news:

Quote:
As failing CBS Evening News anchor Norah O’Donnell began the Monday segment, the disappointment in her voice was palpable: “And tonight, it's looking unlikely that Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh will be impeached.

Beyond that, CBS legal correspondent Jan Crawford sounded far more skeptical of the allegation against the associate Justice and mentioned Ford’s friend admitting the alleged party never occurred:

Speaking publicly for the first time, to The Times reporters, Ford's close friend Leland Keyser, who Ford said was at the party, said she didn't believe Ford's account and that it “just didn't make any sense”. She also said she told the FBI that Ford's allies pressured her to say otherwise.

Now, all four people that Ford identified as being at that high school party in the summer of 1982 have now said no such party occurred,” Crawford added.
https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/20...augh-hit-piece

cbs gets to eat their words. This is why they are FAKE NEWS and THE ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE.

Crap out their smears, the damage gets done, retract at a later date.
Quick reply to this message
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Lagnar For This Useful Post:
Old 09-16-2019, 08:42 PM
AZ_HighCountry AZ_HighCountry is offline
Survivor
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: High country of Arizona
Posts: 6,931
Thanks: 1,747
Thanked 22,655 Times in 5,686 Posts
Default

These people have been out to get Justice Kavanaugh since he was nominated to the High Court. And, unfortunately, much to the chagrin of people here such as libshooter, those efforts have failed repeatedly only to be replaced by a myriad of excuses from the left.

Considering Kamala Harris' record as CA State AG, she's a fine one to be saying anything whatsoever about proper investigations. That comment was laughable at best and embarrassing to her as an attorney.
Quick reply to this message
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to AZ_HighCountry For This Useful Post:
Old 09-16-2019, 09:01 PM
SurvivalOfTheFit's Avatar
SurvivalOfTheFit SurvivalOfTheFit is offline
Horrible Deplorable
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Behind Enemy Lines
Posts: 1,902
Thanks: 5,161
Thanked 9,618 Times in 1,714 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lagnar View Post
Fugly as ever. The words rode hard and put away wet come to mind.



Last we heard from her she was being bitch-slapped by former ICE director Tom Homan
LOL... My lady said every day is a bad hair day for Debbie.
Quick reply to this message
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to SurvivalOfTheFit For This Useful Post:
Old 09-16-2019, 10:34 PM
Explainist Explainist is offline
Hunter
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,595
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3,258 Times in 1,026 Posts
Default

not one word about this at DailyKos. when they shut up you know there is nothing there.
Quick reply to this message
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Explainist For This Useful Post:
Old 09-17-2019, 07:16 AM
Justme11's Avatar
Justme11 Justme11 is online now
French Prometheus unbound
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Houston
Posts: 27,391
Thanks: 30,090
Thanked 65,342 Times in 20,071 Posts
Default

Brett is not what I would call a large hulking lumberjack.
If he really tried to rape a woman I think he would get his butt kicked.



I was not impressed at all with his demeanor or the way he conducted his defence, and he probably drank a lot of beer as he has readily admitted. But I don't think he imposed his sexual will on anyone in a manner that would be considered a crime.
And if he did, they should have brought the case in a timely manner and not waited until he was famous.
Quick reply to this message
Old 09-17-2019, 07:34 AM
HomeDefense's Avatar
HomeDefense HomeDefense is offline
Bad Dog
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Hellfire, Arizona
Posts: 3,940
Thanks: 2,319
Thanked 15,852 Times in 3,384 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lagnar View Post
Fugly as ever. The words rode hard and put away wet come to mind.



Last we heard from her she was being bitch-slapped by former ICE director Tom Homan
Just looking at her makes me want to gag up my breakfast. She was never good-looking, but she is not aging gracefully. Every time I see that mug I feel the heebie jeebies coming on.

Here is the very short version of the Homan hearing. Wasserman Schultz calls his testimony a lie.

Quick reply to this message
Old 09-17-2019, 03:21 PM
Explainist Explainist is offline
Hunter
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,595
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3,258 Times in 1,026 Posts
Default

think about this: the accusations were not made until he judged hundreds if not thousands of cases. if the accuser had a trace of integrity they would have made the accusation at the very begining of his career. this concept apparently actively evades the cheerleaders for the accusers.
Quick reply to this message
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Explainist For This Useful Post:
Old 09-17-2019, 04:16 PM
AZ_HighCountry AZ_HighCountry is offline
Survivor
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: High country of Arizona
Posts: 6,931
Thanks: 1,747
Thanked 22,655 Times in 5,686 Posts
Default

The Democrats will pay for this at the ballot box. The people are getting sick of this. It is only the most radical of the left who are still drinking the Kool-Ade.
Quick reply to this message
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to AZ_HighCountry For This Useful Post:
Old 09-17-2019, 04:22 PM
clocker's Avatar
clocker clocker is offline
Survivor
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 7,667
Thanks: 73,692
Thanked 31,242 Times in 6,711 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AZ_HighCountry View Post
The Democrats will pay for this at the ballot box. The people are getting sick of this. It is only the most radical of the left who are still drinking the Kool-Ade.
May be. But given the complicit Leftist/Dem MSM, and the 412 days til the next election for them to either ignore or recraft the narrative, this'll be but a semi-distant and remolded memory.
Quick reply to this message
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to clocker For This Useful Post:
Old 09-17-2019, 07:18 PM
woodyp woodyp is offline
Survivor
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: East Texas
Posts: 3,215
Thanks: 932
Thanked 4,602 Times in 1,693 Posts
Default

One more picture of that witch and I'm off the forum.............dam you guys for making me look at that. Put up a dam spoiler alert or sumthin'.
Quick reply to this message
The Following User Says Thank You to woodyp For This Useful Post:
Old 09-17-2019, 09:39 PM
AZ_HighCountry AZ_HighCountry is offline
Survivor
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: High country of Arizona
Posts: 6,931
Thanks: 1,747
Thanked 22,655 Times in 5,686 Posts
Default

So consider this from Brit Hume:

https://www.foxnews.com/media/brit-h...i-submitted-it

Quote:
The New York Times story -- later subject of an "editor's note" correction -- should never have been published, Hume said Tuesday on "Tucker Carlson Tonight."

"This is a story that should never have gotten anywhere near print," he said.

"I can only imagine what would've happened back in my newspaper days if I went to an editor and said, 'this is what I've got'. I could see him picking up the copy and throwing it across the room."

Hume said the reportage was not a first-hand account and had been recounted by a witness instead of the alleged accuser herself.

"We're talking about a second-hand account from a witness that the authors did not speak to and who is not speaking... So right there you have a huge strike against you if you're trying to get this story into the old New York Times," he said.

"On top of that, you have the fact the woman herself is not talking... and she has told friends that she doesn't remember this."

"This is nowhere near publishable," he added.
And yet, they did publish it because they are NOT interested in the facts. It's about the appearance of impropriety and the Democrat candidates for President bought it hook, line, and sinker as did that idiot on the squad Pressley. The attorney candidates should consider surrendering their law licenses. They've again demonstrated their ignorance of the law and presumption of innocence.
Quick reply to this message
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to AZ_HighCountry For This Useful Post:
Old 09-18-2019, 04:37 AM
PeterEnergy's Avatar
PeterEnergy PeterEnergy is online now
Rom 14:1, 13; Jam 4:11-12
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 16,249
Thanks: 11,488
Thanked 29,660 Times in 10,387 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HomeDefense View Post
Wasserman Schultz calls his testimony a lie.
Just another example of It's not the evidence but the seriousness of the accusation.
Quick reply to this message
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to PeterEnergy For This Useful Post:
Old 09-18-2019, 09:23 AM
roseman roseman is online now
NRA Life 1971
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: CT
Posts: 6,808
Thanks: 7,766
Thanked 12,133 Times in 5,483 Posts
Default

Thar Schultz photo may give me nightmares.
Quick reply to this message
Old 09-18-2019, 09:37 AM
alv7722's Avatar
alv7722 alv7722 is offline
Come and Take Them!
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Where I Am Now
Posts: 2,781
Thanks: 14,815
Thanked 7,275 Times in 2,097 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PeterEnergy View Post
Just another example of It's not the evidence but the seriousness of the accusation.
F&F had a Jason Nichols on this morning. He said even if there is no evidence against Kavanaugh, he has no exculpatory evidence that he didn't do it!!!

God help our country if these dweebs gain more power!!
Quick reply to this message
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to alv7722 For This Useful Post:
Old 09-18-2019, 10:10 AM
PeterEnergy's Avatar
PeterEnergy PeterEnergy is online now
Rom 14:1, 13; Jam 4:11-12
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 16,249
Thanks: 11,488
Thanked 29,660 Times in 10,387 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alv7722 View Post
F&F had a Jason Nichols on this morning. He said even if there is no evidence against Kavanaugh, he has no exculpatory evidence that he didn't do it!!!

God help our country if these dweebs gain more power!!
Check out Jordan Peterson's youtube video on why we have to destroy Post-Modernism.

This is Post-Modernism, which rejects Aristotelian logic, presumption of innocence and the null hypothesis. It works with Global Warming and all accusations against Republicans.
  1. You start with a conclusion, e.g., Person X is Guilty of Y.
  2. To show your open-mindedness, offer defenders to prove the opposite premise.
  3. Despite some nice try's, you smugly declare that they did not prove to your satisfaction the opposite premise is true.
Quick reply to this message
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to PeterEnergy For This Useful Post:
Old 09-18-2019, 12:45 PM
clocker's Avatar
clocker clocker is offline
Survivor
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 7,667
Thanks: 73,692
Thanked 31,242 Times in 6,711 Posts
Default

C'mon, PE, that'd be using... White Man logic: deduction & sound fact-based arguments. It's what gave rise to white supremacy, and keeps them the most productive and innovative peoples on earth. Conversely, it's what keeps Blacks, Hispanics and women down. That's so racist & sexist. Feelings above all else, man!!
Quick reply to this message
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to clocker For This Useful Post:
Reply

Bookmarks



Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Survivalist Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:
Gender
Insurance
Please select your insurance company (Optional)

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright © Kevin Felts 2006 - 2015,
Green theme by http://www.themesbydesign.net