McConnell wants a speedy Senate trial - Survivalist Forum
Survivalist Forum

Advertise Here

Go Back   Survivalist Forum > >
Articles Classifieds Donations Gallery Groups Links Store Survival Files


Notices

Advertise Here
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-17-2019, 02:27 PM
Jdog67's Avatar
Jdog67 Jdog67 is offline
Survivor
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Tampa Bay area, Florida
Posts: 3,181
Thanks: 710
Thanked 12,501 Times in 2,513 Posts
Default McConnell wants a speedy Senate trial



Advertise Here

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/...n-thanksgiving

McConnell wants to fast track a trial, I wonder if they will use this as a platform to bring out all the FISA information and Dem collusion. This would be a great national stage to expose all this to the world.
Quick reply to this message
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Jdog67 For This Useful Post:
Old 10-17-2019, 02:50 PM
Surviving Suburbia's Avatar
Surviving Suburbia Surviving Suburbia is online now
Priorities. Col. 3:1-4
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: The humid Southeast
Posts: 388
Thanks: 1,228
Thanked 910 Times in 284 Posts
Default

I don't think the House will vote to impeach. It would cost them too much. This is only about dragging Trump through the mud and appeasing their stupid base that doesn't understand how this works. It's not about a real impeachment. Sure, Trump is not the kind of guy you'd want your daughter to marry. But they KNOW they have no case that rises to the bar of "high crimes and misdemeanors." That's why Schiff had to ad-lib the phone call transcript with his own lies--just to make Trump look bad to people who won't question it. The Dems know the Senate would never convict Trump on the evidence available.
Quick reply to this message
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Surviving Suburbia For This Useful Post:
Old 10-17-2019, 07:07 PM
ManyFeathers's Avatar
ManyFeathers ManyFeathers is offline
Why do you ask? 2 Dogs!
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 11,936
Thanks: 20,805
Thanked 41,099 Times in 9,741 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Surviving Suburbia View Post
I don't think the House will vote to impeach. It would cost them too much. This is only about dragging Trump through the mud and appeasing their stupid base that doesn't understand how this works. It's not about a real impeachment. Sure, Trump is not the kind of guy you'd want your daughter to marry. But they KNOW they have no case that rises to the bar of "high crimes and misdemeanors." That's why Schiff had to ad-lib the phone call transcript with his own lies--just to make Trump look bad to people who won't question it. The Dems know the Senate would never convict Trump on the evidence available.
I think you're right!

This is why Pelosi hasn't put it to a vote, they can dribble leaks to the media

It's easier to drag Trump thru the mud and maybe they can cost him the election but I really think this will supercharge Trumps base and will backfire on the Dems and likely cost them the House, the Senate and the Presidency
Quick reply to this message
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ManyFeathers For This Useful Post:
Old 10-17-2019, 08:12 PM
Truck Vet's Avatar
Truck Vet Truck Vet is offline
Let the Debate begin
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 5,448
Thanks: 8,971
Thanked 9,482 Times in 3,421 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ManyFeathers View Post
I think you're right!

This is why Pelosi hasn't put it to a vote, they can dribble leaks to the media

It's easier to drag Trump thru the mud and maybe they can cost him the election but I really think this will supercharge Trumps base and will backfire on the Dems and likely cost them the House, the Senate and the Presidency
Probably. It just depends on other factors as well.
What the Democrats want, and need is a disaster,
any disaster they can blame on Trump.

They may cause some kind of Panic to try and
destroy our economy for instance.
Once they destroy the economy not only will
they win the White House, but they can get
more people on Welfare as well.

They won the house back in 2007 by saying
we lost the war in Iraq (for instance).
Then of course Obama won it, then
surrendered.
Quick reply to this message
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Truck Vet For This Useful Post:
Old 10-17-2019, 10:15 PM
Sharkbait Sharkbait is online now
Not a Commie
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 1,397
Thanks: 4,466
Thanked 2,194 Times in 911 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ManyFeathers View Post
I think you're right!

This is why Pelosi hasn't put it to a vote,
Nancy isn't going to call a vote on anything, there are far too many D's in vulnerable districts.

If team D wants to get rid of Trump, they just need to field a candidate slightly less repugnant than HRC
Quick reply to this message
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Sharkbait For This Useful Post:
Old 10-17-2019, 10:23 PM
TENNGRIZZ TENNGRIZZ is online now
Survivor
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: IN TRANSITION
Posts: 7,752
Thanks: 139,102
Thanked 21,315 Times in 5,946 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sharkbait View Post
Nancy isn't going to call a vote on anything, there are far too many D's in vulnerable districts.

If team D wants to get rid of Trump, they just need to field a candidate slightly less repugnant than HRC
These DNC Socialist Libtards have already had way , WAY too much Chicom loving Kool-Aid for that. JMHO and S/FI!
Quick reply to this message
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to TENNGRIZZ For This Useful Post:
Old 10-18-2019, 02:16 AM
ajole ajole is offline
Survivor
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 9,716
Thanks: 7,691
Thanked 21,927 Times in 6,964 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sharkbait View Post
Nancy isn't going to call a vote on anything, there are far too many D's in vulnerable districts.

If team D wants to get rid of Trump, they just need to field a candidate slightly less repugnant than HRC

At this point, the candidate would have to be a LOT less repugnant than HRC, and so far, the left hasn’t found one.

You’d think that would be easy, right?

I mean...she set the bar pretty high..or low, depending on how you look at it.
Quick reply to this message
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to ajole For This Useful Post:
Reply

Bookmarks



Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Survivalist Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:
Gender
Insurance
Please select your insurance company (Optional)

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright © Kevin Felts 2006 - 2015,
Green theme by http://www.themesbydesign.net