Army's new 6.8 x 51 Sherwood round. - Survivalist Forum
Survivalist Forum

Advertise Here

Go Back   Survivalist Forum > >
Articles Classifieds Donations Gallery Groups Links Store Survival Files


Notices

Military Weapons Forum AR15, AK47, SKS, H&K, Galil, CETME, FN/FAL, Tanks, Ships, Jets, Helicopters....

Advertise Here
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-22-2019, 09:45 PM
manimal87 manimal87 is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 12
Thanks: 0
Thanked 11 Times in 9 Posts
Default Army's new 6.8 x 51 Sherwood round.



Advertise Here

Is that round a intermediate caliber or a full power round? Because some articles which mentioned that round wrote the "army searched for a new intermediate caliber"... But in case size and performance it's closer to a 7.62. So by classification... Is it full power or intermediate?
Quick reply to this message
The Following User Says Thank You to manimal87 For This Useful Post:
Old 09-22-2019, 10:10 PM
AZ_HighCountry AZ_HighCountry is offline
Survivor
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: High country of Arizona
Posts: 7,053
Thanks: 1,761
Thanked 23,348 Times in 5,802 Posts
Default

As far as I am concerned it is a full power round.
Quick reply to this message
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to AZ_HighCountry For This Useful Post:
Old 09-22-2019, 10:41 PM
Hick Industries's Avatar
Hick Industries Hick Industries is online now
Live Secret, Live Happy
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Eastern Oklahoma
Posts: 14,239
Thanks: 17,664
Thanked 34,656 Times in 9,718 Posts
Default

Does anyone know the powder capacity of the case and the chamber pressure?
Intermediate is around 30 grains.
Full power is more like 50 grains.
Quick reply to this message
The Following User Says Thank You to Hick Industries For This Useful Post:
Old 09-22-2019, 10:50 PM
AZ_HighCountry AZ_HighCountry is offline
Survivor
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: High country of Arizona
Posts: 7,053
Thanks: 1,761
Thanked 23,348 Times in 5,802 Posts
Default

Google can be my friend.....sometimes:

http://soldiersystems.net/2019/06/19...in-consulting/

Photo of proposed round:



Without pulling out a reloading manual, depending on the powder say 40-42 grains?

ETA - in my M1A with a Sierra 168 Match King, I've been running 44 grains of BL(C)-2. So maybe closer to 50 grains then if they are looking to drive it at 3000 fps?

Last edited by AZ_HighCountry; 09-22-2019 at 10:53 PM.. Reason: Added some personal loading info for .308
Quick reply to this message
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to AZ_HighCountry For This Useful Post:
Old 09-22-2019, 11:19 PM
charliemeyer007's Avatar
charliemeyer007 charliemeyer007 is offline
reluctant sinner
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Rent Free in your head
Posts: 13,998
Thanks: 33
Thanked 24,136 Times in 8,878 Posts
Default

A .270-(3)08. I'd prefer a 7mm-08. Lots more choices of 7mm bullets than .270.
Quick reply to this message
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to charliemeyer007 For This Useful Post:
Old 09-22-2019, 11:51 PM
ksmedman's Avatar
ksmedman ksmedman is online now
Dunning-Kruger Survivor
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 6,989
Thanks: 11,194
Thanked 19,869 Times in 5,157 Posts
Default

Meh, I'm waiting on 8.6 Creedmore...
__________________
“There is all the difference in the world between treating people equally, and attempting to make them equal.” – Frederich Hayek
Quick reply to this message
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ksmedman For This Useful Post:
Old 09-23-2019, 08:44 AM
AZ_HighCountry AZ_HighCountry is offline
Survivor
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: High country of Arizona
Posts: 7,053
Thanks: 1,761
Thanked 23,348 Times in 5,802 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by charliemeyer007 View Post
A .270-(3)08. I'd prefer a 7mm-08. Lots more choices of 7mm bullets than .270.
Strangely, I have to agree with you. I know a number of guys shooting the 6.5-08 and 7mm-08. Both offer superior ballistics and bullet selections and both give Big Army exactly what it wants which is the desire to cling to the 7.62x51 mm case.
Quick reply to this message
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to AZ_HighCountry For This Useful Post:
Old 09-23-2019, 10:45 AM
manimal87 manimal87 is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 12
Thanks: 0
Thanked 11 Times in 9 Posts
Default

So it's a full power round?
Quick reply to this message
The Following User Says Thank You to manimal87 For This Useful Post:
Old 09-23-2019, 11:03 AM
ajole ajole is offline
Survivor
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 9,685
Thanks: 7,659
Thanked 21,836 Times in 6,941 Posts
Default

Why on earth get hung up on full power or intermediate power?

It's a meaningless thing, with no real widely accepted definition.

What really matters is raw ammo weight, energy on target, and penetration.
Quick reply to this message
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to ajole For This Useful Post:
Old 09-23-2019, 12:02 PM
masiaka masiaka is offline
Target Shooter
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Alabama
Posts: 476
Thanks: 421
Thanked 323 Times in 174 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AZ_HighCountry View Post
Google can be my friend.....sometimes:

http://soldiersystems.net/2019/06/19...in-consulting/

Photo of proposed round:



Without pulling out a reloading manual, depending on the powder say 40-42 grains?

ETA - in my M1A with a Sierra 168 Match King, I've been running 44 grains of BL(C)-2. So maybe closer to 50 grains then if they are looking to drive it at 3000 fps?
The article mentions greater internal case volume than 7.62mm and other .308 derived rounds. The scuttlebutt on performance is ~3500 fps with 125 gr bullets, close to .270 Weatherby Magnum performance. That's why Sig's design uses a steel case head. They went smaller and higher pressure to save weight and needed something stronger than brass to contain it.
Quick reply to this message
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to masiaka For This Useful Post:
Old 09-23-2019, 01:03 PM
Hick Industries's Avatar
Hick Industries Hick Industries is online now
Live Secret, Live Happy
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Eastern Oklahoma
Posts: 14,239
Thanks: 17,664
Thanked 34,656 Times in 9,718 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by masiaka View Post
The article mentions greater internal case volume than 7.62mm and other .308 derived rounds. The scuttlebutt on performance is ~3500 fps with 125 gr bullets, close to .270 Weatherby Magnum performance. That's why Sig's design uses a steel case head. They went smaller and higher pressure to save weight and needed something stronger than brass to contain it.
I have been handloading the 270 win since 1985, and I cant get close to the Army's velocity targets with standard reloading powders, and a 24" barrel.

I suspect the use proprietary powders and packing methods (like Hornaday), a larger case, and push higher pressures.
Quick reply to this message
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Hick Industries For This Useful Post:
Old 09-23-2019, 06:54 PM
AZ_HighCountry AZ_HighCountry is offline
Survivor
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: High country of Arizona
Posts: 7,053
Thanks: 1,761
Thanked 23,348 Times in 5,802 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ajole View Post
Why on earth get hung up on full power or intermediate power?

It's a meaningless thing, with no real widely accepted definition.

What really matters is raw ammo weight, energy on target, and penetration.
Over at Big Army, there are some aspiring individuals in PEO Soldier who dream of their next promotion and this is their way of achieving it. In the meantime, M4s and M27s will continue to be the mainstay infantry weapons for sometime to come.
Quick reply to this message
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to AZ_HighCountry For This Useful Post:
Old 09-26-2019, 06:16 PM
Snyper708 Snyper708 is offline
Hunter
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Eastern North Carolina
Posts: 1,742
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2,721 Times in 1,037 Posts
Default

They have reinvented the 270 with a cartridge that's no better than 100 others.
It probably only cost them a few million.
Quick reply to this message
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Snyper708 For This Useful Post:
Old 09-27-2019, 07:50 AM
MagnumWill's Avatar
MagnumWill MagnumWill is offline
Near The Glow
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Colorado
Posts: 869
Thanks: 2,774
Thanked 1,668 Times in 548 Posts
Default

Exactly right. I agree with the first comment in the posted article with "I think they misunderstood the requirement"
Quick reply to this message
Old 09-27-2019, 09:56 AM
Vodka Wizard's Avatar
Vodka Wizard Vodka Wizard is offline
Prepared
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 382
Thanks: 226
Thanked 601 Times in 259 Posts
Default

Whatever 6.Xmm cartridge they finally end up producing and using will be a blessing. Let's finally get over this 556 era.
Quick reply to this message
Old 10-03-2019, 08:44 AM
MagnumWill's Avatar
MagnumWill MagnumWill is offline
Near The Glow
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Colorado
Posts: 869
Thanks: 2,774
Thanked 1,668 Times in 548 Posts
Default

If the Army makes any decision at all, my bet is on the 6.8mm CT from Textron at this point.
Quick reply to this message
Old 10-03-2019, 12:03 PM
HappyinID's Avatar
HappyinID HappyinID is offline
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 3,151
Thanks: 2,410
Thanked 4,012 Times in 1,870 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vodka Wizard View Post
Whatever 6.Xmm cartridge they finally end up producing and using will be a blessing. Let's finally get over this 556 era.
A 12lb+ lb loaded AR10 is not going to replace 5.56.

This is for punching holes through advanced plates at long range. It's going to suck for a lot of other missions. M4's and MK18's are going to be continuing to kill bad guys for a long time. Likely until another similar size cartridge or 5.56 bullet replaces it.
Quick reply to this message
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to HappyinID For This Useful Post:
Old 10-03-2019, 09:34 PM
Fatbastard Fatbastard is offline
Prepared
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 258
Thanks: 23
Thanked 217 Times in 112 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyinID View Post
A 12lb+ lb loaded AR10 is not going to replace 5.56.

This is for punching holes through advanced plates at long range. It's going to suck for a lot of other missions. M4's and MK18's are going to be continuing to kill bad guys for a long time. Likely until another similar size cartridge or 5.56 bullet replaces it.
Just go with a 25WSSM and call it a day but then you are burning barrels faster. Just go with a 6.5 Grendel and call it a day...nope, not legendary enough.
They know the better mousetrap has already been invented but that pesky capitalism keeps getting in the way.
Quick reply to this message
Old 10-22-2019, 02:01 AM
ehryk ehryk is offline
Alea iacta est, III
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Wherever the Army sends me
Posts: 566
Thanks: 1,036
Thanked 818 Times in 282 Posts
Default

That rim looks to be rebated, perhaps a 6.8x.284 Win?
Quick reply to this message
Old 10-22-2019, 02:52 AM
Stinky Stinky is offline
Hunter
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,302
Thanks: 788
Thanked 1,426 Times in 631 Posts
Default

How much of our money is the Army going to spend trying to re-invent the wheel?
Quick reply to this message
Reply

Bookmarks



Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Survivalist Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:
Gender
Insurance
Please select your insurance company (Optional)

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright © Kevin Felts 2006 - 2015,
Green theme by http://www.themesbydesign.net