Another Impeachment Question?? - Survivalist Forum
Survivalist Forum

Advertise Here

Go Back   Survivalist Forum > >
Articles Classifieds Donations Gallery Groups Links Store Survival Files


Notices

Advertise Here
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-22-2019, 01:02 PM
alv7722's Avatar
alv7722 alv7722 is offline
Come and Take Them!
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Where I Am Now
Posts: 2,806
Thanks: 14,955
Thanked 7,339 Times in 2,118 Posts
Default Another Impeachment Question??



Advertise Here

The House has voted 3 times against opening an impeachment inquiry. How does Pelosi and crew have the authority to unilaterally override those votes??
Just askin'.
Quick reply to this message
The Following User Says Thank You to alv7722 For This Useful Post:
Old 10-22-2019, 01:15 PM
charliemeyer007's Avatar
charliemeyer007 charliemeyer007 is online now
reluctant sinner
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Rent Free in your head
Posts: 14,030
Thanks: 33
Thanked 24,238 Times in 8,900 Posts
Default

Piglosi is "dic(k)tator" Rules - We don't need no stinking rules. The truth is what I say it is.
Quick reply to this message
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to charliemeyer007 For This Useful Post:
Old 10-22-2019, 01:36 PM
Pitbull_Dallas's Avatar
Pitbull_Dallas Pitbull_Dallas is offline
Survivor
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 9,868
Thanks: 11,337
Thanked 28,853 Times in 7,540 Posts
Default

When did they vote?? Voting on it has been a issue for a couple of weeks and Pelosi wont allow it.
Quick reply to this message
Old 10-22-2019, 01:41 PM
LibShooter LibShooter is offline
M.R. Ducks
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: East TN
Posts: 16,873
Thanks: 6,341
Thanked 22,181 Times in 9,867 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alv7722 View Post
The House has voted 3 times against opening an impeachment inquiry. How does Pelosi and crew have the authority to unilaterally override those votes??
Just askin'.
The House has not voted either way on impeachment.
Quick reply to this message
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to LibShooter For This Useful Post:
Old 10-22-2019, 02:33 PM
alv7722's Avatar
alv7722 alv7722 is offline
Come and Take Them!
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Where I Am Now
Posts: 2,806
Thanks: 14,955
Thanked 7,339 Times in 2,118 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LibShooter View Post
The House has not voted either way on impeachment.
The question was impeachment inquiry. It was tried twice by Al Green, and voted against. Can't find the third attempt yet, but it is out there.

https://thehill.com/blogs/floor-acti...or-impeachment

https://www.rollcall.com/news/politi...le-impeachment

Again, what do you Communists feel they will gain by ousting the duly elected President?????????????????
Quick reply to this message
The Following User Says Thank You to alv7722 For This Useful Post:
Old 10-22-2019, 02:59 PM
LibShooter LibShooter is offline
M.R. Ducks
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: East TN
Posts: 16,873
Thanks: 6,341
Thanked 22,181 Times in 9,867 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alv7722 View Post
The question was impeachment inquiry. It was tried twice by Al Green, and voted against. Can't find the third attempt yet, but it is out there.
Rep. Green’s specific resolution was tabled. The Intelligence Committee investigation has nothing to do with that Resolution.
Quick reply to this message
The Following User Says Thank You to LibShooter For This Useful Post:
Old 10-22-2019, 03:44 PM
gavrilo princip's Avatar
gavrilo princip gavrilo princip is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 141
Thanks: 51
Thanked 167 Times in 83 Posts
Default

When the Reps, lead by Linda Graham, decided to impeach Slick Willy for getting his freak on, it was just a matter of time before the shoe was on the other foot, and the Dems would do the same thing. They were just waiting for the right guy and Trump was made to order for them.
Good thing is that the Senate will never vote to remove him, so Trump will just have to fume while the House subpoenas documents that Trump obviously doesn't want to release. The Dems just want to keep shakin' the tree to see how many hookers and slimy Ukrainians fall out.
It's a fairly entertaining show.
Quick reply to this message
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to gavrilo princip For This Useful Post:
Old 10-22-2019, 03:45 PM
NCalHippie's Avatar
NCalHippie NCalHippie is offline
Survivor
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 13,491
Thanks: 28,379
Thanked 23,645 Times in 9,209 Posts
Default

New charge to investigate.
Quick reply to this message
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to NCalHippie For This Useful Post:
Old 10-22-2019, 04:35 PM
ajole ajole is offline
Survivor
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 9,716
Thanks: 7,691
Thanked 21,927 Times in 6,964 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gavrilo princip View Post
When the Reps, lead by Linda Graham, decided to impeach Slick Willy for getting his freak on, it was just a matter of time before the shoe was on the other foot, and the Dems would do the same thing. They were just waiting for the right guy and Trump was made to order for them.
Good thing is that the Senate will never vote to remove him, so Trump will just have to fume while the House subpoenas documents that Trump obviously doesn't want to release. The Dems just want to keep shakin' the tree to see how many hookers and slimy Ukrainians fall out.
It's a fairly entertaining show.
That's asinine.

The Dems haven't actually DONE anything, except threaten to do something.

They keep looking, and ranting and claiming there's something out there if we can just get the right document....but NOTHING is actually being DONE, even when they get documents and "witnesses", because their entire playbook is a bag of bull pucky.

They have nothing that would actually rise to the level of being actionable.

There are no high crimes, and no misdemeanors to use to actually do anything. They can look for 20 years....there's nothing to find.

AND THEY KNOW IT.

It's all just smoke and mirrors to distract the stupid and create as much bad media buzz for the president as possible, for as long as possible.

And the media and the useful idiots just keep sucking it up.
Quick reply to this message
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to ajole For This Useful Post:
Old 10-22-2019, 04:40 PM
charliemeyer007's Avatar
charliemeyer007 charliemeyer007 is online now
reluctant sinner
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Rent Free in your head
Posts: 14,030
Thanks: 33
Thanked 24,238 Times in 8,900 Posts
Default

With all this Impeachment BS, there hasn't been any new unconstitutional gun laws passed, or new taxes that I know of. CONgress is in grid lock and that's a good thing for a free people.
Quick reply to this message
The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to charliemeyer007 For This Useful Post:
Old 10-22-2019, 05:03 PM
alv7722's Avatar
alv7722 alv7722 is offline
Come and Take Them!
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Where I Am Now
Posts: 2,806
Thanks: 14,955
Thanked 7,339 Times in 2,118 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NCalHippie View Post
New charge to investigate.
Well, that kind of makes sense. Though in my mind, there is only ONE charge, and that is making America prosperous again. It would still seem a full House vote would be appropriate to start an investigation???
Quick reply to this message
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to alv7722 For This Useful Post:
Old 10-22-2019, 07:18 PM
ManyFeathers's Avatar
ManyFeathers ManyFeathers is offline
Why do you ask? 2 Dogs!
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 11,936
Thanks: 20,805
Thanked 41,099 Times in 9,741 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alv7722 View Post
The House has voted 3 times against opening an impeachment inquiry. How does Pelosi and crew have the authority to unilaterally override those votes??
Just askin'.
I don't think she's unilaterally overriding votes, they've voted 3 times already and all 3 were shot down. This is the 4th time but hasn't been put to a vote

The Constitution isn't clear except the "House" has the power. It implies a vote and the "Speaker" isn't the "House" only one member

The only thing the Dems are doing is showing the Republicans how to impeach the next Dem

She's actually dumping all the real work on the Senate, they'll have a quick vote and be done with it

Charging the POTUS with high crimes and misdemeanors is a tall order especially when he has Executive Privilege and either Joe Biden broke the same law or he just set precedent
Quick reply to this message
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to ManyFeathers For This Useful Post:
Old 10-22-2019, 07:59 PM
gavrilo princip's Avatar
gavrilo princip gavrilo princip is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 141
Thanks: 51
Thanked 167 Times in 83 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ajole View Post
That's asinine.

The Dems haven't actually DONE anything, except threaten to do something.

They keep looking, and ranting and claiming there's something out there if we can just get the right document....but NOTHING is actually being DONE, even when they get documents and "witnesses", because their entire playbook is a bag of bull pucky.

They have nothing that would actually rise to the level of being actionable.

There are no high crimes, and no misdemeanors to use to actually do anything. They can look for 20 years....there's nothing to find.

AND THEY KNOW IT.

It's all just smoke and mirrors to distract the stupid and create as much bad media buzz for the president as possible, for as long as possible.

And the media and the useful idiots just keep sucking it up.
Man, did you ever drink the Kool Aid. Be honest with yourself for the first time, why are so many people on this site in man love with the Trumpster? I like the guy because he's such an entertaining huckster. He doesn't even try to show admirable character traits.
He exemplifies the statement: For someone who claims to be innocent, he's sure doing everything he can to look guilty. Whenever I see the mug shots of those two greasy Ukrainian leg breakers he's in bed with, I can't help but laugh. They look like extras in a gangster B movie.
Who made this statement:
“You don’t even have to be convicted of a crime to lose your job in this constitutional republic if this body determines that your conduct as a public official is clearly out of bounds in your role,” the politician said. “Impeachment is not about punishment. Impeachment is about cleansing the office. Impeachment is about restoring honor and integrity to the office.”
People on this site are such poor debaters that I'm getting bored.
Quick reply to this message
The Following User Says Thank You to gavrilo princip For This Useful Post:
Old 10-23-2019, 10:44 AM
InfScout's Avatar
InfScout InfScout is offline
Survivor
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Northeast
Posts: 10,150
Thanks: 17,929
Thanked 32,458 Times in 7,846 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gavrilo princip View Post

People on this site are such poor debaters that I'm getting bored.
Nothing or no one says you have to be on this thread. If you are getting bored- leave and go to another thread.
Quick reply to this message
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to InfScout For This Useful Post:
Old 10-23-2019, 11:00 AM
Potawami II Potawami II is online now
Survivor
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,391
Thanks: 15,081
Thanked 4,533 Times in 1,576 Posts
Default

I haven't been following this very much. Today while running errands I heard on the radio (ABC News) that they are arguing in court.

Apparently they want 8 years of Trumps tax returns so that they can determine if he commited any crimes when he paid hush money to Stormy Daniels and another woman. While his lawyers are arguing that he can't be tried for crimes while POTUS.

If this is actually what is going on I have two thoughts about it.
1) I don't see how paying a slut to shut her mouth after she has opened it for you can be a crime since Congress has a slush fund comprised of our tax dollars specifically for doing that same thing.
2) Even POTUS should not be above the law. That is reserved for the Clintons and their crime cartel.
Quick reply to this message
Old 10-23-2019, 12:10 PM
InfScout's Avatar
InfScout InfScout is offline
Survivor
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Northeast
Posts: 10,150
Thanks: 17,929
Thanked 32,458 Times in 7,846 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Potawami II View Post
I haven't been following this very much. Today while running errands I heard on the radio (ABC News) that they are arguing in court.

Apparently they want 8 years of Trumps tax returns so that they can determine if he commited any crimes when he paid hush money to Stormy Daniels and another woman. While his lawyers are arguing that he can't be tried for crimes while POTUS.

If this is actually what is going on I have two thoughts about it.
1) I don't see how paying a slut to shut her mouth after she has opened it for you can be a crime since Congress has a slush fund comprised of our tax dollars specifically for doing that same thing.
2) Even POTUS should not be above the law. That is reserved for the Clintons and their crime cartel.
If Trump did pay off Stormy, it was before he was POTUS. While a bad optic, it has little to do with him since becoming President. I assume he did do that as it has enough facts to back it up.

As far as a political doing it, that's the result of their actions while in office. We saw how the Clinton one went down. He came out rather clean. So Trump should get the same treatment.

As far as tax records releases go, Trump has released summaries of his taxes as many other presidents have done. It's merely a witch hunt. They need some hill on which to plant their flag and they are grasping to find something. They won't.
Quick reply to this message
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to InfScout For This Useful Post:
Old 10-23-2019, 12:21 PM
Iamfarticus's Avatar
Iamfarticus Iamfarticus is offline
Survivor
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: LI, NY
Posts: 6,732
Thanks: 4,613
Thanked 13,225 Times in 4,812 Posts
Default

It looks like the impeachment thing has lost most if its steam in recent days. We'll see what happens when Pelosi & crew get back.. they still out of the US?
Quick reply to this message
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Iamfarticus For This Useful Post:
Old 10-23-2019, 12:54 PM
ajole ajole is offline
Survivor
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 9,716
Thanks: 7,691
Thanked 21,927 Times in 6,964 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gavrilo princip View Post
Man, did you ever drink the Kool Aid.
Sorry...the koolaid is all in your full sized big gulp, and you've been sucking on it hard for far too long.

Quote:
Originally Posted by gavrilo princip View Post
Be honest with yourself for the first time, why are so many people on this site in man love with the Trumpster?
That's so cute...as if I am totally about the lies. It's like you think you are casting shade so very subtly....but it's just more childish BS from a typical useless idiot. Sorry again, lies are YOUR side of the argument.

You're simply wrong. Most of us DISLIKE the man in the office, and we dislike a lot of his personal moments of twitter stupidity. But we LOVE what he does to the leftists heads, and how he is continually making America great, despite everything the media and the leftists do or say.

Quote:
Originally Posted by gavrilo princip View Post
I like the guy because he's such an entertaining huckster. He doesn't even try to show admirable character traits.
Not his job. Besides, sadly, it's the same with almost ALL politicians anymore, regardless of party.


Quote:
Originally Posted by gavrilo princip View Post
He exemplifies the statement: For someone who claims to be innocent, he's sure doing everything he can to look guilty. Whenever I see the mug shots of those two greasy Ukrainian leg breakers he's in bed with, I can't help but laugh. They look like extras in a gangster B movie.
And that has NOTHING to do with the reality. We KNOW you guys are all about appearances and the feels...but in the real world, facts and proof matter. And the left has none. Not a single bit of anything. The fact is there is FAR more "proof" about Clinton being a crook, but that went nowhere...and you guys expect something to magically make this whole drummed up pile of steaming BS make any sense?

Unicorns and rainbows. Angry, nasty drunk unicorns with broken horns and rainbows with only two colors...but you have to hold on to what you got, I guess...


Quote:
Originally Posted by gavrilo princip View Post
Who made this statement:
“You don’t even have to be convicted of a crime to lose your job in this constitutional republic if this body determines that your conduct as a public official is clearly out of bounds in your role,” the politician said. “Impeachment is not about punishment. Impeachment is about cleansing the office. Impeachment is about restoring honor and integrity to the office.”
So now you think some GOP asshat makes sense?

I don't. I don't care what he said, he was wrong then, and it doesn't have any application to now anyway.


Quote:
Originally Posted by gavrilo princip View Post
People on this site are such poor debaters that I'm getting bored.
What's to debate? There's no debate when all you have is innuendo, feels, whining, and ZERO facts that apply.

The echo chamber in your head must make it hard to hear anything from out here in the real world, unless it's piped in directly from the mass media.

You be safe in there.
Quick reply to this message
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ajole For This Useful Post:
Old 10-23-2019, 09:41 PM
hawgy54's Avatar
hawgy54 hawgy54 is offline
Goat Roper
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: TX
Age: 63
Posts: 867
Thanks: 3,683
Thanked 1,506 Times in 577 Posts
Default

Well, technically, they cant go thru with it without another vote in the house. They are hoping to win over more of their idgits by then.
Quick reply to this message
The Following User Says Thank You to hawgy54 For This Useful Post:
Old 10-23-2019, 10:31 PM
Steverino's Avatar
Steverino Steverino is offline
Sam Adams was right....
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: SillyCon Valley
Posts: 7,902
Thanks: 3,269
Thanked 17,767 Times in 5,262 Posts
Default

It's really not an "impeachment".... it's just an "inquiry" that the dems are using to make political hay... They can inquire until Shiffs neck snaps.. but all it will be is an inquiry...

For there to be an impeachment there has to be a House vote....
Quick reply to this message
The Following User Says Thank You to Steverino For This Useful Post:
Reply

Bookmarks



Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Survivalist Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:
Gender
Insurance
Please select your insurance company (Optional)

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright © Kevin Felts 2006 - 2015,
Green theme by http://www.themesbydesign.net