UFO encounters - Page 6 - Survivalist Forum
Survivalist Forum

Advertise Here

Go Back   Survivalist Forum > >
Articles Classifieds Donations Gallery Groups Links Store Survival Files


Notices

Controversial News and Alternative Politics The conspiracy theory section

Advertise Here
Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
UFO expert found dead days after text RKW Controversial News and Alternative Politics 8 10-24-2016 01:10 PM

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-24-2017, 07:24 AM
BlackSaint11 BlackSaint11 is offline
Prepared
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 267
Thanks: 0
Thanked 173 Times in 103 Posts
Default



Advertise Here

I hate to be a downer, but there haven't been any ET visits in our life time.

As far as the pyramids, Stonehenge, and other structures, scientists have shown how simple machines were used to build them.

Area 51 is awesome - because of the aircraft and weapons they test there, not because of aliens. The weather balloon rumors started when CL-282s were being tested and later again for the A-12. Civilians had never seen aircraft that flew as high or as fast and are responsible for a majority of the UFO sightings.

Not as exciting, but the truth almost never is...
Quick reply to this message
The Following User Says Thank You to BlackSaint11 For This Useful Post:
Old 12-24-2017, 09:40 AM
9111315's Avatar
9111315 9111315 is offline
Inglorious Deplorable
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: central America
Posts: 21,136
Thanks: 36,794
Thanked 33,733 Times in 13,351 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackSaint11 View Post
I hate to be a downer, but there haven't been any ET visits in our life time.

As far as the pyramids, Stonehenge, and other structures, scientists have shown how simple machines were used to build them.

Area 51 is awesome - because of the aircraft and weapons they test there, not because of aliens. The weather balloon rumors started when CL-282s were being tested and later again for the A-12. Civilians had never seen aircraft that flew as high or as fast and are responsible for a majority of the UFO sightings.

Not as exciting, but the truth almost never is...
Party pooper.

Hopefully, you don't have any comments about Christmas.
__________________

Time to repeal the 17th.
Quick reply to this message
Old 12-24-2017, 10:19 AM
Jojo's Avatar
Jojo Jojo is offline
Indefatigable
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Oklahoma
Age: 60
Posts: 19,280
Thanks: 45,702
Thanked 45,622 Times in 13,950 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MDMachiavelli View Post
Damn that must have been an unforgettable experience.
Yeah, it is. When you see something like that, something that no matter how hard you try, you can not find an explanation for, it changes your perspective on life.
Quick reply to this message
The Following User Says Thank You to Jojo For This Useful Post:
Old 12-25-2017, 12:00 AM
Sly Raker Sly Raker is offline
Hunter
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 397
Thanks: 930
Thanked 589 Times in 265 Posts
Default

Another article in today's Daily Mail: -

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ble-doubt.html

Seems to me TPTB keep the tap on and just drip, drip, steady drip feed us.
Quick reply to this message
The Following User Says Thank You to Sly Raker For This Useful Post:
Old 12-25-2017, 03:29 AM
BlackSaint11 BlackSaint11 is offline
Prepared
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 267
Thanks: 0
Thanked 173 Times in 103 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sly Raker View Post
Another article in today's Daily Mail: -

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ble-doubt.html

Seems to me TPTB keep the tap on and just drip, drip, steady drip feed us.

All those sightings sound like JASSMs and their test variants.
Quick reply to this message
Old 12-25-2017, 03:40 AM
Justme11's Avatar
Justme11 Justme11 is online now
Wile E Coyote, Genius.
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Houston
Posts: 31,641
Thanks: 36,176
Thanked 81,798 Times in 23,748 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackSaint11 View Post
All those sightings sound like JASSMs and their test variants.
They said it approached from 80,000 ft then accelerated to 1 mile a second. (Mach 7 to Mach 8 at elevation)
Ain't no JASM cruise missile.
Quick reply to this message
The Following User Says Thank You to Justme11 For This Useful Post:
Old 12-25-2017, 03:58 AM
BlackSaint11 BlackSaint11 is offline
Prepared
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 267
Thanks: 0
Thanked 173 Times in 103 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Justme11 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackSaint11 View Post
All those sightings sound like JASSMs and their test variants.
They said it approached from 80,000 ft then accelerated to 1 mile a second. (Mach 7 to Mach 8 at elevation)
Ain't no JASM cruise missile.
ICBMs re-entering orbit can fly that fast. 1 nm/sec is roughly 5.4 mach.

All the evidence that comes out is ambiguous for a reason. Yes there are UFOs, but they're piloted or designed by humans.
Quick reply to this message
Old 12-25-2017, 04:08 AM
Justme11's Avatar
Justme11 Justme11 is online now
Wile E Coyote, Genius.
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Houston
Posts: 31,641
Thanks: 36,176
Thanked 81,798 Times in 23,748 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackSaint11 View Post
ICBMs re-entering orbit can fly that fast. 1 nm/sec is roughly 5.4 mach.

All the evidence that comes out is ambiguous for a reason. Yes there are UFOs, but they're piloted or designed by humans.
All the superpower countries are working on hypersonic maneuvering ICBMs, so that would be my guess as well.

I seriously doubt aliens flew all this way just to play cat an mouse with our F-18s, but I keep an open mind.

As an aside, Mach speed at 80,000 ft is a LOT different than Mach speed at sea level.
Quick reply to this message
Old 12-28-2017, 01:51 AM
bowman bowman is offline
I love this forum
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: right here
Posts: 3,995
Thanks: 1,768
Thanked 6,287 Times in 2,436 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackSaint11 View Post
As far as the pyramids, Stonehenge, and other structures, scientists have shown how simple machines were used to build them.
Pyramids and Stonehenge, okay.

All the other structures? No.

Places like Puma Punku in Bolivia would require the use of tools which are harder than the stones which were shaped. And considering the stone in question, only a diamond would suffice.

The only source of diamond in either North or South America is in Arkansas.

Even if someone in ancient Bolivia knew the diamonds were in Arkansas, there's no way he traveled there and back, then attached a diamond to a copper chisel and produced the kind of precision stonework which is at Pumapunku.


https://www.google.com/search?tbm=is....0.-3W4VTrjM4s


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pumapunku

Not to mention that the stone blocks came from various quarries 5 to 45 miles away from the construction site, over the Andes, a couple of thousand feet above the natural tree line.
Quick reply to this message
Old 12-28-2017, 02:14 AM
leadcounsel's Avatar
leadcounsel leadcounsel is offline
Comic, not your lawyer!
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 12,320
Thanks: 30,082
Thanked 40,634 Times in 9,406 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackSaint11 View Post
I hate to be a downer, but there haven't been any ET visits in our life time.

As far as the pyramids, Stonehenge, and other structures, scientists have shown how simple machines were used to build them.

...
False.

I'm no engineer but I've never seen any reasonable scientific/engineering explanation for the pyramids, stonehenge, Manchu Pichu, huge stones some up to 100 tons moved long distances and carved to perfection in S. America, and huge land carvings in Peru facing the sky, and so forth.

I've seen these stones in Peru. No ancient civilization using primitive tools like ropes and simple machines and stone or iron chisels were moving and carving and lifting these stones into place.

Modern engineers admit that we can't do these feats today with our equipment, or if we can the expense and risk and difficulty is enormous. Doing it with ropes and simple machines would have been simply impossible without deity or alien intervention.

How does a civilization move thousands of 100 ton blocks a hundred miles, carve them, and lift them and set them in place with expert precision?
Quick reply to this message
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to leadcounsel For This Useful Post:
Old 12-28-2017, 05:15 AM
9111315's Avatar
9111315 9111315 is offline
Inglorious Deplorable
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: central America
Posts: 21,136
Thanks: 36,794
Thanked 33,733 Times in 13,351 Posts
Default

Craftsmanship and dedication. Not just ropes, but lots of ropes.

Our big tools have made us stupid.
__________________

Time to repeal the 17th.
Quick reply to this message
The Following User Says Thank You to 9111315 For This Useful Post:
Old 12-28-2017, 06:45 AM
Justme11's Avatar
Justme11 Justme11 is online now
Wile E Coyote, Genius.
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Houston
Posts: 31,641
Thanks: 36,176
Thanked 81,798 Times in 23,748 Posts
Default

Ancient man was more intelligent than modern man. At least that is what I was taught in anthropology class many years ago.

If all you have is animal and human power, ropes and levers, mankind would have been expert and ultra inventive in their usage, as he is now with the tools of today (computers, modern machines and so forth).

What looks impossible is indeed our daily fare. Yesterday being no different than today in that regard. Only the medium has changed.
Quick reply to this message
The Following User Says Thank You to Justme11 For This Useful Post:
Old 12-28-2017, 07:20 AM
9111315's Avatar
9111315 9111315 is offline
Inglorious Deplorable
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: central America
Posts: 21,136
Thanks: 36,794
Thanked 33,733 Times in 13,351 Posts
Default

It was too easy.

The King said, Move the Mountain.

Peasants would move it or die. That necessity does breed invention . . . and some cleansing of the gene pool.
__________________

Time to repeal the 17th.
Quick reply to this message
Old 12-28-2017, 08:37 AM
ImStillHere's Avatar
ImStillHere ImStillHere is offline
Wrong Side of Heaven
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 3,429
Thanks: 2,356
Thanked 6,705 Times in 2,414 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bowman View Post
Pyramids and Stonehenge, okay.

All the other structures? No.

Places like Puma Punku in Bolivia would require the use of tools which are harder than the stones which were shaped. And considering the stone in question, only a diamond would suffice.

The only source of diamond in either North or South America is in Arkansas.

Even if someone in ancient Bolivia knew the diamonds were in Arkansas, there's no way he traveled there and back, then attached a diamond to a copper chisel and produced the kind of precision stonework which is at Pumapunku.


https://www.google.com/search?tbm=is....0.-3W4VTrjM4s


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pumapunku

Not to mention that the stone blocks came from various quarries 5 to 45 miles away from the construction site, over the Andes, a couple of thousand feet above the natural tree line.
Pumapunku has always been more more intriguing to me than all the other ancient builds and world wonders. Even though it has been RC dated to 500AD ish (new in the stone work age but estimated by others to be much older 15k) the detail in carvings cannot be reproduced (machinery angular limitations), no tool marks, and 131 metric ton stones were moved.


Some of the pictures are what hold my interest reminds me of stone versions of Lincoln logs. The stone "H"s had to do something.
https://search.handy-tab.com/?q=puma...rt&type=images
Quick reply to this message
Old 12-28-2017, 08:52 AM
Justme11's Avatar
Justme11 Justme11 is online now
Wile E Coyote, Genius.
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Houston
Posts: 31,641
Thanks: 36,176
Thanked 81,798 Times in 23,748 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ImStillHere View Post
Pumapunku has always been more more intriguing to me than all the other ancient builds and world wonders. Even though it has been RC dated to 500AD ish (new in the stone work age but estimated by others to be much older 15k) the detail in carvings cannot be reproduced (machinery angular limitations), no tool marks, and 131 metric ton stones which is more than a fully loaded Nimitz-class aircraft carrier 101 metric tons (long/uk/metric/load out swag) were moved.


Some of the pictures are what hold my interest reminds me of stone versions of Lincoln logs. The stone "H"s had to do something.
https://search.handy-tab.com/?q=puma...rt&type=images
I would check your weight of the Nimitz. It is 100,000 tonnes.
Quick reply to this message
The Following User Says Thank You to Justme11 For This Useful Post:
Old 12-28-2017, 09:08 AM
ImStillHere's Avatar
ImStillHere ImStillHere is offline
Wrong Side of Heaven
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 3,429
Thanks: 2,356
Thanked 6,705 Times in 2,414 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Justme11 View Post
I would check your weight of the Nimitz. It is 100,000 tonnes.
Yup my bad...I droped a K when I was doing a comparison, I bewildered myself with my own awe.. exactly why I am not able to get paid in that field.
Quick reply to this message
The Following User Says Thank You to ImStillHere For This Useful Post:
Old 12-28-2017, 09:15 AM
9111315's Avatar
9111315 9111315 is offline
Inglorious Deplorable
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: central America
Posts: 21,136
Thanks: 36,794
Thanked 33,733 Times in 13,351 Posts
Default

What does a lack of tool marks prove?

Last time I look at an engine piston, there were not any tool marks. Any that were there were buffed out.

Lack of tool marks only indicate that the carving was done by a craftsman. They did have a good grasp of descriptive geometry in order the achieve the tight dimensional joints.
__________________

Time to repeal the 17th.
Quick reply to this message
Old 12-28-2017, 09:43 AM
Creek Walker's Avatar
Creek Walker Creek Walker is offline
6 Boys and 13 Hands
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Southeastern Illinois
Posts: 10,118
Thanks: 11,540
Thanked 28,024 Times in 7,019 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ImStillHere View Post
Pumapunku has always been more more intriguing to me than all the other ancient builds and world wonders. Even though it has been RC dated to 500AD ish (new in the stone work age but estimated by others to be much older 15k) the detail in carvings cannot be reproduced (machinery angular limitations), no tool marks, and 131 metric ton stones were moved.


Some of the pictures are what hold my interest reminds me of stone versions of Lincoln logs. The stone "H"s had to do something.
https://search.handy-tab.com/?q=puma...rt&type=images
Puma Punku debunked

The whole movie.
Ancient Aliens Debunked
Quick reply to this message
The Following User Says Thank You to Creek Walker For This Useful Post:
Old 12-28-2017, 09:56 AM
Robot's Avatar
Robot Robot is offline
Survivor
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 9,026
Thanks: 28,383
Thanked 14,334 Times in 5,279 Posts
Default

I would have thought the recent F-18's Pilot(s) report that had multiple visual, multiple radars, Ridiculous Acceleration/Deceleration, Intelligent response to Pilot Communication, Interaction with the ocean, IR imagery, Pentagon acknowledged data collected would have put some of the UFO scoffers to rest. I think this is tame to other stuff the Government has.



I see the above incident as the Pentagons first move at soft disclosure.
Quick reply to this message
Old 12-28-2017, 09:59 AM
9111315's Avatar
9111315 9111315 is offline
Inglorious Deplorable
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: central America
Posts: 21,136
Thanks: 36,794
Thanked 33,733 Times in 13,351 Posts
Default

Maybe SETI needs to start scanning subspace radio frequencies.
__________________

Time to repeal the 17th.
Quick reply to this message
Reply

Bookmarks



Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Survivalist Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:
Gender
Insurance
Please select your insurance company (Optional)

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright © Kevin Felts 2006 - 2015,
Green theme by http://www.themesbydesign.net