2nd Amendment Interpretation-GUN RIGHTS THREADS MERGED HERE - Page 61 - Survivalist Forum
Survivalist Forum

Advertise Here

Go Back   Survivalist Forum > >
Articles Classifieds Donations Gallery Groups Links Store Survival Files


Notices

Firearms General Discussion Rifles, pistols, shotguns, scopes, grips and everything in between.

Advertise Here
Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What's going to cause SHTF/when/how long will it MERGE THREAD benajah General Discussion 1891 10-12-2018 11:00 AM
Government Shutdown-ALL Threads merged Here Dobbs Political News and Discussion 1182 10-21-2013 03:59 PM
Flooding In Colorado-Threads Merged Here Steps Manmade and Natural Disasters 90 09-28-2013 08:00 PM
NSA and DEA: Has anyone heard of SOD?-All SOD Threads Merged Here KCFirepower Political News and Discussion 71 08-10-2013 07:19 AM
Forming groups threads merged here twyggy Disaster Preparedness General Discussion 210 11-25-2012 02:07 AM

View Poll Results: Do you support gun control
Yes, I favor strong gun control measures 1 0.31%
Yes, I favor some gun control( hi cap mag ban,some types of guns) 0 0%
I favor some laws, storage of guns, background checks 34 10.59%
No new gun control laws,...criminals don't follow laws 105 32.71%
No, gun laws are too restrictive right now. 181 56.39%
Voters: 321. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-07-2015, 04:50 PM
Colt's Avatar
Colt Colt is offline
Grevcon 10
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 12,056
Thanks: 20,794
Thanked 37,756 Times in 9,041 Posts
Default



Advertise Here

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jdog67 View Post
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015...?intcmp=hplnws

The Supreme Court refused to hear a case regarding the banning of "assault weapons." The Seventh Circuit is now a little less free than it used to be, as the Second Amendment is allowed to be infringed in that geographic region. Lets hope the trend doesn't continue.
This is extremely bad and has really embolden the gun control crowd. I have a feeling, though, that it was more about the SC stalling gun control cases until after the craziness. You know at least a couple justices would have liked to drop the hammer on that law.
Quick reply to this message
Old 12-14-2015, 07:45 AM
Bluetick Coonhound Bluetick Coonhound is offline
I love this forum
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: outside of Seattle
Posts: 776
Thanks: 1,399
Thanked 1,601 Times in 507 Posts
Default

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...d-by-gun-laws/

"None of the major shootings that have occurred in this country over the last few months or years that have outraged us, would gun laws have prevented them.
— Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.). interview on CBS’s “This Morning,” Dec. 4, 2015

A colleague pointed out this statement by Marco Rubio as a possible fact check, suggesting that it was almost certainly incorrect. It posed an interesting challenge, given the reams of data to examine.

The Fact Checker obviously takes no position on proposed gun-control laws. But given the attention of recent mass public shootings, is Rubio correct that none of the major shootings in recent years would have been prevented by new gun laws?

...

The Pinocchio Test

This is certainly a depressing chronicle of death and tragedy. But Rubio’s statement stands up to scrutiny — at least for the recent past, as he framed it. Notably, three of the mass shootings took place in California, which already has strong gun laws including a ban on certain weapons and high-capacity magazines.

Gun-control advocates often point to the experience in other countries that have enacted gun laws that heavily restrict gun ownership; as we have shown, quantitative measures of cross-comparative crime statistics, especially where the crime is not consistently defined (i.e., “mass shooting”), usually end up being apples-to-oranges comparisons. It is possible that some gun-control proposals, such as a ban on large-capacity magazines, would reduce the number of dead in a future shooting, though the evidence for that is heavily disputed. But Rubio was speaking in the past, about specific incidents. He earns a rare Geppetto Checkmark.
Quick reply to this message
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
2nd admendment, gun argumants, gun ban, gun control, gun rights, obama, sandy hook, school shootings



Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Survivalist Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:
Gender
Insurance
Please select your insurance company (Optional)

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright © Kevin Felts 2006 - 2015,
Green theme by http://www.themesbydesign.net