Obama’s Supreme Court Nominee Revealed - Page 5 - Survivalist Forum
Survivalist Forum

Advertise Here

Go Back   Survivalist Forum > >
Articles Classifieds Donations Gallery Groups Links Store Survival Files


Notices

General Discussion Anything non-survival related - news and information, current events, general chit-chat stuff.

Advertise Here
Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Supreme Court Bitch Slaps Obama Baddogg5 Political News and Discussion 48 08-17-2016 07:48 PM
Obama Supreme Court Justice? Dragon Tamer Political News and Discussion 86 02-21-2016 10:41 AM
Supreme Court to hear Obama Birther Case FindMyStapler Political News and Discussion 24 02-07-2013 03:23 PM
Supreme Court to hear Obama fradulent ID accusations dudeman351 Political News and Discussion 44 01-12-2013 09:10 PM
WorldNetDaily: U.S. Supreme Court confers on Obama eligibility Mullenite General Discussion 10 12-03-2010 01:39 PM
Obama's citizenship case reaches the supreme court HDCowboy Controversial News and Alternative Politics 43 04-30-2010 08:30 PM
Supreme Court Nominee and Secret Societies BcoXO Controversial News and Alternative Politics 1 06-07-2009 11:16 AM
The Obama Citizenship/Supreme Court Petition Straight Razor General Discussion 2 12-02-2008 09:19 AM

View Poll Results: Is this a good nominee?
Yes 6 6.00%
No 94 94.00%
Voters: 100. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-17-2016, 03:26 AM
HorseSoldier HorseSoldier is offline
Survivor
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: ANC AK
Posts: 3,137
Thanks: 3,190
Thanked 4,516 Times in 1,938 Posts
Default



Advertise Here

Seems easy to me -- hold hearings, reject down party lines. Repeat as necessary. That's the system. The hold my breath tantrum refusing to participate in government, on the other hand, will cost them political capital to no real end.
Quick reply to this message
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to HorseSoldier For This Useful Post:
Old 03-17-2016, 06:16 AM
Kalashnikov47's Avatar
Kalashnikov47 Kalashnikov47 is online now
Trump is Treasonous
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: US-Deep South
Age: 59
Posts: 6,476
Thanks: 989
Thanked 18,700 Times in 4,968 Posts
Default

He would be the third most liberal SC justice if confirmed, he is left of kagan and breyer...umm, the reps had better not confirm this communist...
Quick reply to this message
Old 03-17-2016, 07:39 AM
Creek Walker's Avatar
Creek Walker Creek Walker is online now
6 Boys and 13 Hands
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Southeastern Illinois
Posts: 9,929
Thanks: 11,259
Thanked 27,190 Times in 6,854 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pranqster1 View Post
Again, Obama is playing chess and republicans are playing checkers.
Quick reply to this message
Old 03-17-2016, 09:18 AM
InfScout's Avatar
InfScout InfScout is offline
Survivor
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Northeast
Posts: 10,062
Thanks: 17,735
Thanked 32,078 Times in 7,769 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HorseSoldier View Post
Seems easy to me -- hold hearings, reject down party lines. Repeat as necessary. That's the system. The hold my breath tantrum refusing to participate in government, on the other hand, will cost them political capital to no real end.
Yep- hold hearings. First send him to the Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution or something. Have them grill him on the BoR. Find his views unsuitable. Turn over their findings to the next higher committee. In 4 months or so, they'd be done and hold a nomination vote. Gee- he lost. Back to the drawing board for obama.

The Senate would perhaps be seen as exercising due-diligence instead of acting as a rubber stamp for obama. It just takes a while to go through the procedure. Refusing to even hold anything would be wrong and viewed poorly by the voters (a certain group of them); it would allow the dems to spew a lot of crap and the media would have a field day condemning Reps. Holding no hearings at all would likely have a negative impact in Nov.
Quick reply to this message
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to InfScout For This Useful Post:
Old 03-17-2016, 11:02 AM
deep woods deep woods is offline
Survivor
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,859
Thanks: 7,439
Thanked 9,888 Times in 3,202 Posts
Default

If anyone feels so strongly about this action that they would switch votes because of it, they won't be voting republican anyway. Go by the Biden Rule, no hearings, and mean it. The dems have their own way to much, to make rules as it benefits them. Time to give 'em their own medicine.
Quick reply to this message
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to deep woods For This Useful Post:
Old 03-17-2016, 11:07 AM
Moccasin's Avatar
Moccasin Moccasin is offline
Mod Certified PITA!
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 10,833
Thanks: 31,029
Thanked 18,473 Times in 7,086 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HorseSoldier View Post
Seems easy to me -- hold hearings, reject down party lines. Repeat as necessary. That's the system. The hold my breath tantrum refusing to participate in government, on the other hand, will cost them political capital to no real end.
It is a continuation of their largely failed strategy of trying to block everything Obama does. And it DOES make sense, from their extremely narrow, self serving view. If they seem to be collaborating with Obama, they fear a backlash that will remove them from office. Damage to the country is irrelevant when compared to the danger to their political careers. Still, it is being more or less said that, after the election, they'll fast-track Garland's approval and he'll be on the bench before anyone can stop them. That's politics in America these days.
Quick reply to this message
Old 03-17-2016, 11:37 AM
juskom95's Avatar
juskom95 juskom95 is offline
Time to melt snowflakes!
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Kentucky
Age: 35
Posts: 30,164
Thanks: 65,855
Thanked 66,357 Times in 22,045 Posts
Awards Showcase
Outstanding Member 
Total Awards: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moccasin View Post
It is a continuation of their largely failed strategy of trying to block everything Obama does.
How is this different from the Democrats' policies and practices?
Quick reply to this message
Old 03-17-2016, 11:48 AM
Preacherboy Preacherboy is offline
Learning
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 6,530
Thanks: 4,295
Thanked 6,561 Times in 3,084 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elmojo View Post
The people elected Obama. He didn't just appear in the white house last week. This nominee IS their voice. Get over it.
When Shrub was president, the senate was confirming judges clear into the fall of 2008.

Please stop the 2nd amendment scare. Every time this crap comes up prices go through the roof. But nothing ever happens. No new restrictions for years but how many panic buying sprees have there been?
Its like everybody goes nuts...psssst.. (whisper) "Obama hates AR's"...Ahhhhhh!!!! Quick, buy everything in sight before its all gone!!!! Pay anything but buy NOW!!!! Ahhhhhh! Ahhhhhh!!!!!
No new restrictions in years? What planet have you been living one?

See Conn, NY, and CO and many other states and then tell me that there have been "no new restrictions in years"

Please are you being ignorant or plain belligerent?
Quick reply to this message
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Preacherboy For This Useful Post:
Old 03-17-2016, 12:00 PM
Gator Monroe Gator Monroe is offline
I love this forum
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 10,045
Thanks: 4,038
Thanked 13,235 Times in 5,594 Posts
Default

The guys who claim the Sky is not falling are Democrat apologists and are covering for Democrat instigated gun grabbing (see California's pending legislation)
Quick reply to this message
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
garland, obama, scotus



Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Survivalist Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:
Gender
Insurance
Please select your insurance company (Optional)

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright © Kevin Felts 2006 - 2015,
Green theme by http://www.themesbydesign.net