![]() |
| The Following User Says Thank You to rogue For This Useful Post: | ||
|
||||
|
an EMP that would be powerful enough to take out a vehicle would be massive in size. There is no working "portable" EMP. Electronics is my passion.
That being said. For an emp to shut down the vehicles computer it would have to be a powerful pulse, in DC, that would confuse the car's computer long enough to think that there was a massive short somewhere. This would trigger the computer to shutdown, but the computer system in a car isn't like a home computer. After a massive ground fault it will turn itsself back on again with no problems. They have no boot cycle and are well protected enough for an electric shock to do no damage to them. You can drive your car down the road, leave it in gear, and shut the key off. The engine will stop running, but turn the key back to the normal run position and it is instantly running again. Think of this like you would think of a powerline falling on the car. it is pushing massive amounts of power through the metal but nothing from it can hurt the cars electrical. It is too well grounded within itsself (not to the earth), and DC power is way different than AC in terms of power disruption. For an electrical blast to stop a vehicle it would have to make direct contact with the engine block (which is a vehicles main ground) and put out enough juice to fry ignition components (i.e. plug wires, powerpack, coil, etc.) but that would take a major amount of power, and would still be virtually inneffective against any vehicles electrical design. edit: I know they show this happening in movies and there is plenty of talk about it happening, but it is simply something that does not exist right now. Maybe in a few years the technology would come that could make such a device, and there is a working EMP that the Navy tested, but this was mounted to the front of a carrier ship and was a large as a small house. The area of effect from this monster EMP was only like 50yards, and in that yard radius, there was a measured response from testing equipment, but nothing that could stop the electronic systems from functioning. Last edited by AnimateDeath; 10-23-2007 at 09:21 PM.. |
| The Following 47 Users Say Thank You to AnimateDeath For This Useful Post: | ||
18alfa, 84tecate, ActionJackson, Ammo, Beatupoldcop, Beezee, Blacksmith44, Bridgetdaddy, calsr, charlevoixboy, Cryptoboats, DownInABunker, DrK, Grinnan Barrett, HiroProX, hooked, JackD, JedLMF, jonrb, KennH, Kroenen117, laurin, MajorGreen, Maranatha07, Maxx442, MC Ain't Crazy, mortalis09, Palindoras, PNW*RN, Polarisail, Prairie Dog, QuiBonJinn, RemingtonandCummins, rikisarahdennis, Rodl, sfmbr, Silentpoet, STEEPOE, streetshark1966, Sumatra, TacomaJPP, Tantalshooter, tazman, testhop, tonyj54, Twangbanger, vera21375 | ||
|
|||
|
A portable EMP is known as a nuclear bomb.
The failed Navy test just served as a means to hide the truth, that they really do have portable non-nuclear EMP generators as well, but that is most likely to remain unconfirmed due it's tactical value. And yes, I think a unmodified 1995 vehicle is vulnerable to EMP, and if that EMP is strong enough to fry your vehicle, it's going to fry any other electronic gear thats not in a Faraday cage. |
| The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to Squirrelmaster For This Useful Post: | ||
|
||||
|
Quote:
http://science.howstuffworks.com/e-bomb3.htm Quote:
Cars have many circuits that use FETs, Transistors, ICs, and many other small and delicate parts for running relays, control systems, and many other critical areas. Feeding high power EMP or even RF into such a device will cause the gate barriers to brake down and freely conduct from gate to collectors or from source to drain. The only devices you can be sure won't brake down (and still can to an extent) are radiation hardened and hermetically sealed devices. IRF carries many of these devices on the mark, all be it some costing as much as a spare computer (which you could do and leave in a ziplock bag, wrapped in aluminum foil. Quote:
Links: http://www.heritage.org/Research/Mis...bg1372map1.gif http://www.strategypage.com/qnd/urba.../20010524.aspx Let me note that while the vehicles shell, while metal, will protect the car to some extent, its not because it's like lightning. The shell acts like a deflector/reflector more akin to antennas. This effect is greatly used in satelite dish's, due to the parabolic shape, to focus the energy twords the real antenna. In otherwords, the exterior is bouncing off the energy much like it would a bullet. This is the sole reason it's hard to get signals in fringe zones with cellular while inside your car. I also have quoted data from my teachings in Electronic Engineering and Computer Science at college. If you'd like a book that discuses some technical areas of this in regards to the happening inside the components, I'd suggest Cambridge University Presses excellent all around electronic book title "The Art of Electronics" by Paul Horowitz and Winfield Hill. I'd also suggest taking a look at some of the material on this site in the downloads section. It's very enlightening. Also search for studies on the military's testing. As for securing your vehicle, I'd suggest covering up areas lacking coverage , with holes over 2-4 inches of most concern. If it's not metal body, it may have trouble on SHTF day. A manual transmission may help to be able to start the car, but I'd watch for systems failing such as pressures readings, temperature sensors, fuel controls, air/mixture controls, etc. If it's metal it's most likely fine the way it is. |
| The Following 30 Users Say Thank You to Paulycracker For This Useful Post: | ||
BackyardRambo, Beatupoldcop, BigFootDriver, BigLou71, chaosofcreation, ComancheSniper, CPL_BS_88, DeesSqueeze, docarchilles, EddieApoc, GammaRei, grandma, Irishwarlord, Maranatha07, mortalis09, NorthWolfeCND, OKGlocker, papawpaul, psk1, QuiBonJinn, rikisarahdennis, Silentpoet, Slipstream, Stormfeather, Twangbanger, Uncle Bob, vera21375, wmbanse, Woodchuck, wrt355 | ||
|
||||
|
PS: Squirrel and I are right, they do have them:
http://stinet.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=...fier=ADA013620 http://www.rttc.army.mil/resources/8975.htm http://www.fas.org/spp/starwars/cong...as197010_1.htm I have seen pictures of such a device, with a large storage capacitor on the back of a semi-rig. I believe the call such devices "EMPG/T" for ElectroMagnetic Pulse Generator Transportable. |
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Paulycracker For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|||
|
What are those devices cops have,that they can aim at a vehicle,and kill its electronics? Wouldn't that be just a low level emp weapon?
|
|
||||
|
I think it operates more like a taser. I wouldn't trust any vehicle with computers guiding it like they've had since the 90s. They regulate gas efficiency, fuel mix, ect- there's even a rumored 'kill chip' that's supposed to make the engine commit suicide after so many miles. I don't know if I believe that, but it's a safe bet that electrical disruptors will permanently retire onboard computers
__________________
"Forget all your ideas about civilized society, boys - here's a chance to raise merry hell." - Allen Dulles, OSS Director ... |
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Dwind For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|||
|
Reason number 12 that my Secondary BOV is an old Chevy. No computers to fry.
|
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TxStrong For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|||
|
from what I have read..the more exxspensive cars r more suseptible as they have more computers on them..the older vehicles stand a better chance given the same situation...ie)same distance from the bomb..and the further away from the blast u go..u will find more of cars will start..that have computers..who knows..the articles I have read differ..so who to believe is the prob..then u got to hope hes right
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to azurevirus For This Useful Post: | ||
|
||||
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horse - The ultimate in EMP proof vehicles.
|
| The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Barbarossa For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|||
|
the stuff iv'e read says that the majority of vehicles will not be affected by an emp, as previously thought.
|
|
|||
|
if your really worried keep a points type distributor for your small block chevy so u could swap it out and keep on truckin.
|
|
||||
|
Old cars or trucks with points ignitions and carburators are the only EMP proof vehicles that I know of. I would even keep spare battery, plugs, condensors, and ignition switches in a faraday cage just to be on the safe side. It's been said that 95% of all vehicles will be DEAD in the water in the event of an EMP attack. The grid would go down and it would be 1850 again. It would take many years to recover from a full blown EMP attack because EVERYTHING we rely on has very vulnerable electronic components to run it. I have studied this subject extensively and it is VERY, VERY BAD. Just something else that I worry about.
See ya, Spam |
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Spam70 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|||
|
Quote:
my diesel car with mechanical fuel pump, engine and well everything and doesnt even have a radio wont be affected by EMP many people seem to overlook them, in a crisis nearly all trucks will work and are tough, can carry alot of gear and large fuel tanks diesel cars and trucks that are mechanical with no electrics for the engine still can brand new wont be effected they have no points to burn out, no spark plugs, no electrics really on the engine Last edited by GQtim; 02-01-2008 at 07:33 AM.. |
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to GQtim For This Useful Post: | ||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Spam70 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|||
|
everything ive read says that emp dont actually stop cars, unless your parked under power lines or a metal tower. somebody's been watching "the day after" on AMC. if your that worried get a points type distributor to put in your car, thats if its carburated.
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|