Survivalist Forum

Advertise Here

Go Back   Survivalist Forum > General Discussion Section > Polls and Surveys
Articles Chat Room Classifieds Donations Gallery Groups Links Store Survival Files



Notices

Advertise Here
View Poll Results: Which do you think is the better round?
223 57 20.58%
7.62 X 39 126 45.49%
Undecided 15 5.42%
Either round will do 79 28.52%
Voters: 277. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-23-2007, 03:27 PM
kev's Avatar
kev kev is offline
Forum Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: East Texas
Age: 46
Posts: 14,706
Thanks: 1,619
Thanked 31,607 Times in 6,683 Posts
Default 223 Vs 7.62 X 39



Advertise Here

Which one do you think is better?
__________________
Our survival gear Section

If you have a question about the forum, please post it in this section.
General questions sent through private messages will be ignored.
The Following User Says Thank You to kev For This Useful Post:
Old 04-24-2007, 12:55 AM
Kenno Kenno is offline
I love this forum
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: North Woods; but not the REAL north woods; not the northwoods that has icebergs
Posts: 1,063
Thanks: 0
Thanked 108 Times in 61 Posts
Awards Showcase
Outstanding Informative Post 
Total Awards: 1
Default

I think bullet weight and penetration of windshields is very important. the 223 has very little of either
Old 04-25-2007, 10:26 AM
Ammo's Avatar
Ammo Ammo is offline
VIP Member

 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Central Florida
Age: 70
Posts: 5,453
Thanks: 4,040
Thanked 2,925 Times in 1,678 Posts
Awards Showcase
Outstanding Thread 
Total Awards: 1
Default

For the first time in my life, I think, I marked undecided, on anything.
To me both of these rounds have advantages and and disadvantages, and neither is an ideal round.
IMHO a good rifle round needs to have excellent accuracy, power/penetration, and can do that over extended ranges.
In fairness, the original concept, of these two rounds, was for basically short range. high rate of fire, light weight, carbine type use/weapons. They both do that well..sort of.
So I'd say get a couple of each, just to be sure you have all the bases covered.
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Ammo For This Useful Post:
Old 04-25-2007, 10:42 AM
kev's Avatar
kev kev is offline
Forum Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: East Texas
Age: 46
Posts: 14,706
Thanks: 1,619
Thanked 31,607 Times in 6,683 Posts
Default

Good post Ammo - in fairness I added a "either round will do" option.
__________________
Our survival gear Section

If you have a question about the forum, please post it in this section.
General questions sent through private messages will be ignored.
Old 04-25-2007, 01:56 PM
eeyore eeyore is offline
A friend of the Site

 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,925
Thanks: 1,107
Thanked 897 Times in 515 Posts
Default

I was one of the "either round will do". They both are good for what they will do. A few years ago i would have said that the 223, had the edge just because the military uses it. But with the advent of cheap surplus, there are probably more 7.62x39 rounds in the US then 223 rounds.
Old 04-26-2007, 06:22 AM
kev82abn's Avatar
kev82abn kev82abn is offline
Prepared
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Southeast Texas
Posts: 261
Thanks: 11
Thanked 136 Times in 52 Posts
Default

Have to agree with AMMO.
Old 07-13-2007, 02:04 PM
Phil Takken's Avatar
Phil Takken Phil Takken is offline
Young Gun
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Devon, England
Age: 22
Posts: 107
Thanks: 1
Thanked 14 Times in 11 Posts
Default

If im not mistaken 7.62 is .308 am i wrong? .308 is the largest maximum legal calibre over here in marry old england. unlucky for me.
Old 07-13-2007, 03:44 PM
Kenno Kenno is offline
I love this forum
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: North Woods; but not the REAL north woods; not the northwoods that has icebergs
Posts: 1,063
Thanks: 0
Thanked 108 Times in 61 Posts
Awards Showcase
Outstanding Informative Post 
Total Awards: 1
Default

The 7.62X39 is the SKS or AK-47 round. The 7.62X51 is the NATO round which is a much more powerful round still used in belt fed MG's and sniper rifles, some times this round is reffered to as the 308 Winchester. The 223 is also known as the 5.56 NATO, hope thios helps.
Old 07-15-2007, 03:29 AM
FutureRM's Avatar
FutureRM FutureRM is offline
Per Mare Per Terram
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Southern England
Age: 24
Posts: 20
Thanks: 1
Thanked 28 Times in 7 Posts
Default Depends

Depends what you're doing with it. For hunting and if you're using long barreled rifle it'd be the 7.62x39, as you'd get better accuracy at a greater range. If you're using an assault rifle/in a CQB situation then you'd be better off with the .223. It's lighter and easier to carry around in greater numbers, and from a military point of view it is more likely to wound as than the 7.62x39, and a severely wounded man is far more difficult for an enemy to cope with than a dead one. They have to evacuate and care for him, which will slow them down.

I'm voting either, although the law in england means you pretty much can't own or use anything larger than a .223.

Last edited by FutureRM; 07-15-2007 at 03:32 AM..
Old 07-15-2007, 11:33 AM
LuniticFringeInc LuniticFringeInc is offline
Survivor
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: North Texas
Posts: 4,794
Thanks: 1,833
Thanked 4,513 Times in 2,127 Posts
Default

Both are good at what they are designed to do, short to medium engagement ranges on soft targets or targets behind light material, light weight, high rate of fire while maintaining control of the weapon allowing you to score hits. They were never ment to take out cars, shoot through brick walls etc...but a jack of all trades and a master of none. I found both to work well in 'Stan and Iraq. I will readily admit that the 5.56 in the M4 leaves a bit to be desired after about 200 yards although scoring hits on target beyond that range is still quiet easy. I still perfer the 5.56 to the 7.62 x 39, especially when using the heavier 77gr loads.

JME...
Old 07-18-2007, 04:00 AM
solinvictus's Avatar
solinvictus solinvictus is offline
Getting there....
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,229
Thanks: 58
Thanked 887 Times in 396 Posts
Default

I voted 7.62x39 simply for the added bullet weight. Yeah, you can get some long shots out of a .223/5.56 NATO out of a longer barrel, but there's little energy left at the back end of the shot.
Old 07-18-2007, 03:45 PM
LuniticFringeInc LuniticFringeInc is offline
Survivor
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: North Texas
Posts: 4,794
Thanks: 1,833
Thanked 4,513 Times in 2,127 Posts
Default

Quote:
I voted 7.62x39 simply for the added bullet weight.
Understandable, and thats a very case to make for the 7.62 x 39. The down side is its rainbow like trajectory much beyond 250 yards. In urban combat such as what one sees in Iraq this aint much of a problem.

Quote:
Yeah, you can get some long shots out of a .223/5.56 NATO out of a longer barrel, but there's little energy left at the back end of the shot.
You got half a leg to stand on there, especially in the M4 version. But at 600 yards and a bit further I guarentee there is enough energy left to ruin ones day to the point you dont want to be ion the receiving end! Whether your incapcitated instantly or not...a sucking chest wound is still a sucking chest wound anyway you slice it

In combat you aint got a chance if you cant score hits, and there aint no runner up trophys being handed out. Both rounds leave a bit to be desired, just in different catagories...
Old 07-21-2007, 06:11 PM
FredLee FredLee is offline
Survivor
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: michigan
Posts: 4,092
Thanks: 128
Thanked 2,142 Times in 1,180 Posts
Default

Had both.762x39 will penetrate what 223 won't.Like trees and block.223 will just shatter to pieces.762x39 started out 123 grain,and if it ain't broke,don't fix it.223 started out around 50-55 grain,was bumped up to 62 gr.,still not happy,they bump it up again to 77 gr.Why not just build it right the first time?you will typically have less stoppages and case failures with 762x39,also.
Old 07-24-2007, 07:17 PM
solinvictus's Avatar
solinvictus solinvictus is offline
Getting there....
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,229
Thanks: 58
Thanked 887 Times in 396 Posts
Default

Well, I know the Little Black Lego Rifle has its fans, but the AR-15 is too high maintenance for me to trust in a SHTF situation. I'll stick to the simplicity of Kalashnikov action or a bolt.
Old 07-24-2007, 07:26 PM
Reed's Avatar
Reed Reed is offline
Hooligan on Holiday
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Godfrey Illinois
Age: 51
Posts: 2,367
Thanks: 6,531
Thanked 4,119 Times in 1,453 Posts
Default

Both rounds are effective in thier own way as pointed out by several already.
For some reason this thread reminds me of one that would have had Melvin aka GunKid calling us all foul names and pronouncing himself winner.
Old 07-24-2007, 07:38 PM
Kenno Kenno is offline
I love this forum
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: North Woods; but not the REAL north woods; not the northwoods that has icebergs
Posts: 1,063
Thanks: 0
Thanked 108 Times in 61 Posts
Awards Showcase
Outstanding Informative Post 
Total Awards: 1
Default

Besides the round and the load in that round, one must take into account the rifle as well. Neither platform is perfect and they are both long in the tooth by modern standards. A new round is called for perhaps a 6mm or 6.5mm, of course this would take another decade to accomplish.
Old 01-20-2008, 05:30 PM
Herd Sniper Herd Sniper is offline
American fearmaker
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 11,475
Thanks: 11,469
Thanked 19,878 Times in 6,756 Posts
Default

I own guns that shoot both rounds. That can be a good thing in some cases. My upgraded SAR-1 will drop a deer or wild hog if I need it to and my ARs/M-4s will give me accuracy when needed. Eventually, I plan to have a 7.62 NATO AR-10 or M1A rifle added to the armory for other options.
Old 01-20-2008, 11:31 PM
whistlestop whistlestop is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 235
Thanks: 23
Thanked 140 Times in 78 Posts
Awards Showcase
Outstanding Gardening Post or Thread 
Total Awards: 1
Default

223 is better because its more common
Old 01-20-2008, 11:44 PM
DeadHorrorFan's Avatar
DeadHorrorFan DeadHorrorFan is offline
Elitist Gun Snob
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,365
Thanks: 50
Thanked 842 Times in 317 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by whistlestop View Post
223 is better because its more common
....Not really. I don't know where you live, but it is definitely not more common in the current market anywhere that I've lived in the last 3 years.
The Following User Says Thank You to DeadHorrorFan For This Useful Post:
Old 01-21-2008, 09:56 AM
421slicer's Avatar
421slicer 421slicer is offline
just waitin' for it
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 681
Thanks: 139
Thanked 341 Times in 178 Posts
Default

Have to go with the 7.62. I don't imagine having to take a shot at more than a few hundred yards 'round here. I like the "knock down" punch too. I remember hearing stories from 'Nam vets unloading their M-16s on a guy, then having to pull out their .45 to knock them down! Plus... the rifle has a lot to do with it too. I'll pick up an AK/SKS over any M4/AR any day for reliability under abuse. JMHO! If I needed a longer range, more accurate rifle/round. I may go for the .223. But not in my current environment! As for the .223 being more common... I can got to a local place and buy 10,000-50,000 rounds of 7.62x39 RIGHT NOW! and be on my way home with it. I'd be lucky to get a 1000 rd case of .223. (not that I'd ever buy that much anyway, LOL)


EDIT: in fact I just checked their inventory... NO .223 and thousands of CASES(1000 rds/case) of 7.62. All .223 are listed ZERO quantity on hand.

O wait... they have a few cases of American Eagle (Federal) Tracers! LOL

Last edited by 421slicer; 01-21-2008 at 10:10 AM..
The Following User Says Thank You to 421slicer For This Useful Post:
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
223, 223 remington, 223 vs 7.62 x 39, 223 vs 7.62x39, 5.56mm, 7.62x39



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright Kevin Felts 2006 - 2012,
Green theme by http://www.themesbydesign.net