Survivalist Forum

Advertise Here

Go Back   Survivalist Forum > General Discussion Section > Political News and Discussion
Articles Chat Room Classifieds Donations Gallery Groups Links Store Survival Files


Advertise Here
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-31-2013, 10:49 AM
0002S's Avatar
0002S 0002S is offline
μολὼν λαβέ
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 2,122
Thanks: 1,701
Thanked 2,384 Times in 1,047 Posts

Advertise Here

You'll be very surprised at their findings.

If you take the time to read you'll clearly see how the band guns crowd attempts to use stats based on the wrong questions to frame the banning argument.





This Article has reviewed a significant amount of evidence from a wide variety of international sources. Each individual portion of evidence is subject to cavil—at the very least the general objection that the persuasiveness of social scientific evidence cannot remotely approach the persuasiveness of conclusions in the physical sciences. Nevertheless, the bur‐ den of proof rests on the proponents of the more guns equal more death and fewer guns equal less death mantra, espe‐ cially since they argue public policy ought to be based on that mantra.149 To bear that burden would at the very least require showing that a large number of nations with more guns have more death and that nations that have imposed stringent gun controls have achieved substantial reductions in criminal violence (or suicide). But those correlations are not observed when a large number of nations are compared across the world.

Over a decade ago, Professor Brandon Centerwall of the Uni‐ versity of Washington undertook an extensive, statistically sophis‐ ticated study comparing areas in the United States and Canada to determine whether Canada’s more restrictive policies had better contained criminal violence. When he published his results it was with the admonition:
If you are surprised by [our] finding[s], so [are we]. [We] did not begin this research with any intent to “exonerate” hand‐ guns, but there it is—a negative finding, to be sure, but a nega‐ tive finding is nevertheless a positive contribution. It directs us where not to aim public health resources.150"
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to 0002S For This Useful Post:
Old 08-31-2013, 11:15 AM
2wheelslave's Avatar
2wheelslave 2wheelslave is offline
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Kansas
Posts: 2,439
Thanks: 2,713
Thanked 4,336 Times in 1,474 Posts

More legal guns=less crime
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to 2wheelslave For This Useful Post:
Old 08-31-2013, 11:21 AM
The Saint's Avatar
The Saint The Saint is offline
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: NORTH Western Michigan
Posts: 39,282
Thanks: 37,075
Thanked 49,387 Times in 21,061 Posts
Awards Showcase
Top Poster 
Total Awards: 1

Another thing they failed to take into account was, the education of said countries that allowed firearms was significantly higher than in those countries where uneducated people were basically told how to live day to day.

the RIGHT to own a firearm comes with the RESPONSIBILITY to understand safe firearm use.

This is something we assume here in America but is not assumed or practiced in other less educated countries.
The Following User Says Thank You to The Saint For This Useful Post:
Old 08-31-2013, 11:25 AM
texstephen's Avatar
texstephen texstephen is offline
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: TEXAS º¿º
Posts: 2,899
Thanks: 1,069
Thanked 5,802 Times in 1,889 Posts

Nope just as outlawing murder and suicide hasn't stopped it. If you chain everyone to a chair it would probably reduce all crime but at that point who would care.
Old 08-31-2013, 11:35 AM
CAWB's Avatar
CAWB CAWB is offline
VIP Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The gunshine state
Posts: 22,509
Thanks: 66,875
Thanked 85,069 Times in 21,057 Posts

Banning them would create a massive black market for firearms. And we all know criminals wouldn't bother turning in those "illegal" guns.
The Following User Says Thank You to CAWB For This Useful Post:
Old 08-31-2013, 12:12 PM
TxHannah's Avatar
TxHannah TxHannah is offline
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 9,297
Thanks: 8,917
Thanked 29,450 Times in 7,747 Posts

We only have to look at the UK to see that making it very difficult or impossible for the average person to own firearms does not mean less violence. They just use other methods such as stabbing, beating, 'glassing', throwing acid, & etc. And unarmed gangs perpetrating violence are rapidly replacing the single, armed criminal.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TxHannah For This Useful Post:


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Harvard Study: No Correlation Between Gun Control and Less Violent Crime ThinkingBuddha General Discussion 14 08-31-2013 07:59 AM
Twice as many favor more guns over banning guns to reduce crime KeS Firearms General Discussion 1 01-19-2013 02:22 AM
Major Harvard Study Published in Federal Govt Journal Confirms Fluoride Lowers IQ BobMacnamara General Discussion 7 07-28-2012 12:33 AM
Harvard study: Pasteurized milk from industrial dairies linked to cancer Horned One Health, Fitness and First Aid 33 03-04-2012 10:24 AM
Banning bikes passengers to reduce gun crime Kipper Disaster Preparedness General Discussion 16 12-11-2011 02:09 PM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:30 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright © Kevin Felts 2006 - 2015,
Green theme by