Congress Preparing To Move For Impeachment Of Obama? - Survivalist Forum
Survivalist Forum

Advertise Here

Go Back   Survivalist Forum > >
Articles Classifieds Donations Gallery Groups Links Store Survival Files


Notices

Advertise Here
Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Obama aide says impeachment threat taken seriously Old Soldier Political News and Discussion 46 07-27-2014 11:30 AM
Overpasses For Obama's Impeachment, Two Patriots Arrested arcaneadam Political News and Discussion 39 08-22-2013 05:05 PM
Rumor- N.B.R.A. Files Articles of Impeachment against Obama. CrypticCRICKET Political News and Discussion 15 08-14-2013 07:09 PM
The growing case for impeachment of Obama SharpDog Controversial News and Alternative Politics 28 02-24-2013 02:00 PM
An Impeachment Warning To Obama saygon1 Political News and Discussion 37 09-25-2012 01:56 PM
Res calls for Impeachment of Pres if said pres declares war without Congress Approval valhalarising Political News and Discussion 26 03-12-2012 10:04 AM
HEADS UP: ATF making a move before new Congress convenes ..... Gallo Pazzesco Firearms General Discussion 31 01-03-2011 02:17 PM
Tancredo Calls for Obama's Impeachment Mullenite Controversial News and Alternative Politics 20 07-29-2010 01:25 PM
Preparing to Move to Mexico Hawkeye Alex Disaster Preparedness General Discussion 33 05-23-2010 02:46 PM

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-13-2013, 08:45 AM
Bearack's Avatar
Bearack Bearack is online now
Survivor
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 6,328
Thanks: 3,829
Thanked 14,931 Times in 4,436 Posts
Default Congress Preparing To Move For Impeachment Of Obama?



Advertise Here

Snip:South Carolina Congressman Tom Rice (R) has filed a congressional resolution, which would, if adopted, direct the body “to bring a civil action for declaratory or injunctive relief to challenge certain policies and actions taken by the executive branch.”

Read more: http://benswann.com/congress-prepari...#ixzz2nMlobTkK
Follow us: @BenSwann_ on Twitter

I was wondering when this might take place. Granted, if it grows legs is one thing. It actually happening could send things spiraling quickly!
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Bearack For This Useful Post:
Old 12-13-2013, 08:55 AM
JDH's Avatar
JDH JDH is offline
Si vis pacem, para bellum
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 5,189
Thanks: 419
Thanked 7,864 Times in 3,041 Posts
Default

Not going to happen. The democrat lite party has no political will to challenge the chosen one.
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to JDH For This Useful Post:
Old 12-13-2013, 08:56 AM
Sky1950's Avatar
Sky1950 Sky1950 is offline
Survivor
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Texas
Age: 66
Posts: 4,532
Thanks: 22,647
Thanked 11,807 Times in 3,413 Posts
Default

Ain't gonna happen, my friend for several reasons. First, Republicans, as a whole, don't have the gonads even if they wind up taking the Senate in 2014. Second, nothing will ever impeach the first black president. Yeah it IS a race issue regardless of what anyone says. But it's not racial negative bias toward him, it's white guilt. The majority will let this country go down the tubes before they cross that line.

I'm of the opinion that the U.S. is past the point of retrieval and the crash needs to come sooner rather than later. If incomprehensible pain is to come to the people, let it come before my grandchildren have to deal with it. It's our fault regarding the state of our country, not theirs

Keep prepping
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Sky1950 For This Useful Post:
 
Old 12-13-2013, 08:58 AM
Bearack's Avatar
Bearack Bearack is online now
Survivor
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 6,328
Thanks: 3,829
Thanked 14,931 Times in 4,436 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JDH View Post
Not going to happen. The democrat lite party has no political will to challenge the chosen one.
Oh, I agree. It also gives fodder during the 2014 elections as the party of racist.

They are constitutionally obligated to follow through with this as the President does not have authority to rewrite law nor pick and chose what part of the law he will follow, however, I honestly think this would be damaging to the opposition.
The Following User Says Thank You to Bearack For This Useful Post:
Old 12-13-2013, 09:42 AM
Jojo's Avatar
Jojo Jojo is offline
Blue in a Red state
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Oklahoma
Age: 57
Posts: 15,755
Thanks: 35,933
Thanked 35,438 Times in 11,259 Posts
Default

Keep working on impeaching a man who will be out of office before you can finish. In the meantime, the dems will work on winning in 2014 and 16.
The Following User Says Thank You to Jojo For This Useful Post:
Old 12-13-2013, 10:02 AM
Bearack's Avatar
Bearack Bearack is online now
Survivor
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 6,328
Thanks: 3,829
Thanked 14,931 Times in 4,436 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jojo View Post
Keep working on impeaching a man who will be out of office before you can finish. In the meantime, the dems will work on winning in 2014 and 16.
The problem is these law makers are obligated to if the president his breaching is oath, are they not?

And do you agree or disagree that Obama violated his authority here?
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Bearack For This Useful Post:
Old 12-13-2013, 10:06 AM
cleatis's Avatar
cleatis cleatis is offline
The end is,,,,,
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: southeast of nowhere
Posts: 8,580
Thanks: 8,197
Thanked 11,082 Times in 4,736 Posts
Default

Could do more harm than good. Yes he needs to go and should have never been there in the first place. But focus on fixing what is wrong. Not playing political chess. Just a move for the upcoming elections is all this is.

Want to fix the real problem? Set stricter term limits!!!!
The Following User Says Thank You to cleatis For This Useful Post:
Old 12-13-2013, 10:09 AM
Kpz1234's Avatar
Kpz1234 Kpz1234 is offline
Bad Guy Target
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,455
Thanks: 606
Thanked 2,082 Times in 786 Posts
Default

/thatsracist.jpg
The Following User Says Thank You to Kpz1234 For This Useful Post:
Old 12-13-2013, 10:22 AM
Jojo's Avatar
Jojo Jojo is offline
Blue in a Red state
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Oklahoma
Age: 57
Posts: 15,755
Thanks: 35,933
Thanked 35,438 Times in 11,259 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bearack View Post
The problem is these law makers are obligated to if the president his breaching is oath, are they not?

And do you agree or disagree that Obama violated his authority here?
The problem is a certain group of people have been yelling impeachment since BEFORE he even took the oath. In the period after the election and before the inauguration the news was filled with those who promised to obstruct him in any way possible. God knows they have tried and if they had a shred of evidence impeachment charges would have been brought before now.
Obviously, I disagree on the 2nd part of your statement.
The Following User Says Thank You to Jojo For This Useful Post:
Old 12-13-2013, 10:32 AM
Bearack's Avatar
Bearack Bearack is online now
Survivor
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 6,328
Thanks: 3,829
Thanked 14,931 Times in 4,436 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jojo View Post
The problem is a certain group of people have been yelling impeachment since BEFORE he even took the oath. In the period after the election and before the inauguration the news was filled with those who promised to obstruct him in any way possible. God knows they have tried and if they had a shred of evidence impeachment charges would have been brought before now.
Obviously, I disagree on the 2nd part of your statement.
The president has no authority to rewrite law nor does he have authority to pick and chose what portion of law to enforce. Turning a blind eye is as dangerous as allowing anyone to break the law. This is a direct violation, regardless of what drums were beat before hand. And the obstructionist regarding the ACA had a legitimate beef in that this law was based through nefarious means. Regardless of those obstructionist, they did not break any laws or necessary decorum, however, the president in this case did.

My biggest contention is that no matter what is done, it will look bad either way. If they persue, they are racist. If they don't, they are breaking their own oath to protect law. It's a catch 22 here.
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Bearack For This Useful Post:
Old 12-13-2013, 11:03 AM
Castle71's Avatar
Castle71 Castle71 is offline
Jeep addict extrodinaire.
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 4,008
Thanks: 836
Thanked 9,025 Times in 2,873 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bearack View Post
My biggest contention is that no matter what is done, it will look bad either way. If they persue, they are racist. If they don't, they are breaking their own oath to protect law. It's a catch 22 here.
Be (labeled) racist but right.
Old 12-13-2013, 11:13 AM
Harmless Drudge's Avatar
Harmless Drudge Harmless Drudge is offline
Deplorable Basketeer
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: A once-free nation
Age: 39
Posts: 23,939
Thanks: 175,842
Thanked 91,867 Times in 19,155 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jojo View Post
Keep working on impeaching a man who will be out of office before you can finish. In the meantime, the dems will work on winning in 2014 and 16.
Are you saying it is a much easier task to buy elections than it is to enforce the purpose of our government? Yes, I would agree it is.
The Following User Says Thank You to Harmless Drudge For This Useful Post:
Old 12-13-2013, 11:15 AM
Harmless Drudge's Avatar
Harmless Drudge Harmless Drudge is offline
Deplorable Basketeer
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: A once-free nation
Age: 39
Posts: 23,939
Thanks: 175,842
Thanked 91,867 Times in 19,155 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jojo View Post
The problem is a certain group of people have been yelling impeachment since BEFORE he even took the oath. In the period after the election and before the inauguration the news was filled with those who promised to obstruct him in any way possible. God knows they have tried and if they had a shred of evidence impeachment charges would have been brought before now.
Obviously, I disagree on the 2nd part of your statement.
I am one of them. Based on the threats ("promises") he made during the 2008 campaign, I stood against him even when he was still in a primary battle with Hitlery Klinton.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Harmless Drudge For This Useful Post:
Old 12-13-2013, 11:24 AM
Justme11's Avatar
Justme11 Justme11 is offline
French Prometheus unbound
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,662
Thanks: 17,983
Thanked 39,116 Times in 12,793 Posts
Default

Well, if he has committed provable impeachable offenses, then he should be impeached, regardless of politics. It's the law of the land and he is subject to it the same as everyone else. Unfortunately, people that become inconvenient to this administration seem to have a history of tragic accidents. (crashing their cars while travelling at supercollider speeds, stepping out of helicopters while hovering hundreds of feet in the air, shooting themselves in the throat, crashing their airplanes, getting interrogated to death.) Clumsy clumsy people.

The law is the only thing that separates us from the animals.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Justme11 For This Useful Post:
Old 12-13-2013, 11:26 AM
Grevlin's Avatar
Grevlin Grevlin is offline
"Fly birdies! Fly!"
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: "Not all those who wander are lost"
Posts: 22,533
Thanks: 38,624
Thanked 66,453 Times in 17,041 Posts
Default

Are we gonna boot him out before or after he reaches the last day of second term?
The Following User Says Thank You to Grevlin For This Useful Post:
Old 12-13-2013, 11:32 AM
JLW1974 JLW1974 is offline
Hunter
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 1,926
Thanks: 1,676
Thanked 2,569 Times in 1,087 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bearack View Post
Snip:South Carolina Congressman Tom Rice (R) has filed a congressional resolution, which would, if adopted, direct the body “to bring a civil action for declaratory or injunctive relief to challenge certain policies and actions taken by the executive branch.”

Read more: http://benswann.com/congress-prepari...#ixzz2nMlobTkK
Follow us: @BenSwann_ on Twitter

I was wondering when this might take place. Granted, if it grows legs is one thing. It actually happening could send things spiraling quickly!
Would it change anything? Bill Clinton was impeached but it didn't change anything:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeach...f_Bill_Clinton

Even though he was acquited, we all know he was guilty. The impeachment process was just for show.
Old 12-13-2013, 12:41 PM
geoffl geoffl is offline
Hunter
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: NYS
Posts: 1,757
Thanks: 2,778
Thanked 5,062 Times in 1,313 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jojo View Post
The problem is a certain group of people have been yelling impeachment since BEFORE he even took the oath. In the period after the election and before the inauguration the news was filled with those who promised to obstruct him in any way possible. God knows they have tried and if they had a shred of evidence impeachment charges would have been brought before now.
Obviously, I disagree on the 2nd part of your statement.
I would guess then that if a conservative becomes president and issues executive orders to skirt the laws,, picks and chooses which laws or parts of laws to enforce, and employs hand picked czars to enforce his wishes without Congressional oversight it will be OK with you and other people who consider themselves liberal? After all Obama has established this behavior now and the electorate's and media's ignoring of it has made it the new norm going forward.
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to geoffl For This Useful Post:
Old 12-13-2013, 12:56 PM
Kiljoy616's Avatar
Kiljoy616 Kiljoy616 is offline
Twinkies
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Loose lips, sink ships.
Posts: 1,741
Thanks: 1,826
Thanked 1,258 Times in 711 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bearack View Post
Snip:South Carolina Congressman Tom Rice (R) has filed a congressional resolution, which would, if adopted, direct the body “to bring a civil action for declaratory or injunctive relief to challenge certain policies and actions taken by the executive branch.”

Read more: http://benswann.com/congress-prepari...#ixzz2nMlobTkK
Follow us: @BenSwann_ on Twitter

I was wondering when this might take place. Granted, if it grows legs is one thing. It actually happening could send things spiraling quickly!
Sure
Old 12-13-2013, 01:10 PM
9111315's Avatar
9111315 9111315 is offline
Plan Z: Run!
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: central America
Posts: 17,378
Thanks: 26,763
Thanked 25,692 Times in 10,646 Posts
Default

We need to elect new members to congress and the senate who would, if needed, impeach a president.
__________________
.
==]:*']
.
.

Whoohoo! I got a new Flux Capacitor today. I should have called Granger sooner!
The Following User Says Thank You to 9111315 For This Useful Post:
Old 12-13-2013, 01:53 PM
TxHannah's Avatar
TxHannah TxHannah is offline
Totally grumpin'
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 14,588
Thanks: 20,712
Thanked 53,924 Times in 12,631 Posts
Default

Obama has flagrantly disregarded constitutional law as well as many other laws. We all know it. The facts are out there for those who are not too blind to see. Obamas actions both domestic AND foreign (read the other day Obama's foreign policies were 'schizophrenic', which is proven by facts) and his willingness to lie to cover up the deaths of devoted soldiers and appointees, and to force gun shop owners to illegally sell weapons to Mexican drug cartels and then try to prosecute those gun shop owners...

No, I don't care what people's excuses are. We have a mentally ill dictator in office who does not have the intellectual capacity to do the job despite the public being constantly told he's "the smartest guy in the room". His toadies work constantly to remind us of his vast, infinite intellect. Why? Because they know he is grossly incapable of doing his job. Hell, his own words and actions are proof enough for anyone to see that he has no clue what he's doing.

People can be fools if they choose to and constantly defend Obama and his foolish, destructive, and completely unnecessary harm he has caused America here and abroad. All the fools are doing is giving evidence of just how foolish they are. You'd think they would be humiliated to defend Obama time and time and time again. But Einstein had a saying about insanity, that the definition of it was doing the same thing over and over again but expecting different results.

We see the results our country and the world had gotten with Obama. The results speak for themselves and need no embelleshment, and certainly cannot stand up to critical, logical scrutiny.

Unless you're by definition an insane apologist for him.
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to TxHannah For This Useful Post:
Reply

Bookmarks



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright © Kevin Felts 2006 - 2015,
Green theme by http://www.themesbydesign.net