Lever action + revolver combo: .44 or .357? - Page 3 - Survivalist Forum
Survivalist Forum

Advertise Here

Go Back   Survivalist Forum > > >
Articles Classifieds Donations Gallery Groups Links Store Survival Files

Advertise Here
Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Break Action double or lever action shotgun? Varta Firearms General Discussion 17 04-02-2013 07:29 PM
357 Revolver and Lever Action Scrumbag Pistol and Revolver Forum 90 03-07-2013 02:48 PM
best lever action citys4 Rifle Forum 48 09-04-2011 06:38 PM
lever action in 30-30 or .44 mag? surviver94 Firearms General Discussion 22 08-02-2010 11:54 AM
Lever action rifle and revolver set questions Grevlin Firearms General Discussion 51 05-10-2010 03:44 PM
30-30 Lever Action CaptainUnderpants Firearms General Discussion 51 10-17-2009 10:40 AM
Bolt action or lever action .22 ?? SteveMO Rifle Forum 16 07-24-2009 11:37 PM
Lever action or Bolt action? A-Train Rifle Forum 26 07-20-2009 12:07 PM
Lever action!! hightech_redneck Firearms General Discussion 10 05-08-2008 06:43 PM
410/45 combo revolver-The Judge Dr.Gee Firearms General Discussion 2 04-22-2008 01:32 PM

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-29-2012, 01:09 PM
jknova's Avatar
jknova jknova is offline
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: NoVA
Posts: 3,072
Thanks: 583
Thanked 5,275 Times in 1,845 Posts

Advertise Here

I've been favoring .45 Colt and thinking about either a Marlin or a Henry. But now I'm waffling and thinking about .357 again, and I noticed some 1873 rifles on auction sites. Most of them are made by Uberti (one is branded Cimmaron, but that's just a relabeled Uberti with different finish options). They tend to be more expensive. I would be okay with paying more if I think it's worth it, though I'd feel better about it if Uberti were in America instead of Italy.

I also saw some Chapparel-branded rifles that are either 1866 or 1873 models. It's unclear from the ad, which says both of those years, but I think it's 1866. My understanding is that the parts for these are made in Italy, but the rifles are assembled in Connecticut.

Any thoughts about these particular rifles, these brands in general, or the 1866 and 1873 actions for handgun calibers? My goal is plinking and home defense, and I'm mainly interested in either .357 Magnum or .45 Colt. Thanks
Old 08-29-2012, 11:16 PM
ww1military ww1military is offline
The War to end all Wars
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Fla Panhandle
Posts: 623
Thanks: 441
Thanked 574 Times in 296 Posts

I have read that the older actions 1866 or 1873 have a toggle in them and as a result are much weaker than the 1892/1894 type actions that have locking lugs at the rear of the bold. I, on occasion, load the 357 a bit on the hot side so long term durability was an issue with me. I got a Rossi 92 in 357 and have not regretted it. Currently I am looking for another one. I have also heard nice things about the Marlin but it seems to run $200+ higher than the Rossi and that seemed to be an excessive premium to me.
The Following User Says Thank You to ww1military For This Useful Post:
Old 09-01-2012, 06:11 AM
bat out of hell bat out of hell is offline
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Lone Star State
Posts: 26
Thanks: 2
Thanked 12 Times in 9 Posts

Companion rifle/handgun is a fine idea. With 357 vs 44, it just comes down to power, cost, and common.

Presumably, 44 magnum is more powerful, more expensive, and harder to find.
Old 09-01-2012, 06:21 AM
home in oz's Avatar
home in oz home in oz is offline
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Southeastern Kansas
Posts: 11,431
Thanks: 10,814
Thanked 6,272 Times in 4,741 Posts

Originally Posted by jknova View Post
I joined this forum to ask this question. Some background first -

My concealed carry weapon right now is a Smith & Wesson 642 in .38 Special. My dad (who is 71) also uses a .38 Special revolver for home defense. So, I already have some investment in the .38 Special platform, but I think it's underpowered for some uses I have in mind.

What I'm interested in doing is getting a lever action rifle and a revolver that can use the same ammunition. My uses are fun/plinking, and SHTF/home defense. I don't currently hand-load but I plan to do so for fun/plinking. For now, I plan to use factory ammunition for defense, for legal reasons; if law and order collapse, that becomes moot.

The rifles I have in mind are variants of the Winchester 1894, Marlin 1894 and Henry Big Boy, all of which are available (in theory) in both .357 and .44 Magnum. I would pair a modern Smith & Wesson or Ruger revolver with either.

The pros I see for .357:
- More fun for plinking (less recoil)
- Less recoil may also make follow-up shots faster and more accurate
- .38 Special could be used in many of my weapons in a pinch or for plinking
- A .357/.38 die would take me a long way in handloading

The pros I see for .44:
- I like the idea of big holes in bad guys
- I think it would be more effective against large predators, eg bears
- With that huge cartridge, lots of flexibility in bullet weight, powder etc. I could buy mild .44 Mag or .44 Special defense loads that would still devastate bad guys, especially from a rifle

For some reason, .357 lever action rifles from Winchester and Marlin run $700+ even used. I can walk into a local store and walk out with a lightly used .44 Mag Marlin for $495 today.

Ok, that's a lot of info - here are my questions.

1 - .357 vs .44 for my intended purposes (plinking, defense, SHTF)
2 - .357 vs .44 for hand loading
3 - does anybody know where I can actually buy a .357 Marlin or Winchester without selling a kidney? What's up with the price difference?

Thanks - JK
More reasons:

You may already reload for .38 and have the dies?

You can carry more .357 ammo.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to home in oz For This Useful Post:
Old 09-03-2012, 05:11 PM
jknova's Avatar
jknova jknova is offline
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: NoVA
Posts: 3,072
Thanks: 583
Thanked 5,275 Times in 1,845 Posts

Thanks for all of the input - I decided to go with the Marlin 1894C in .357. I found one for sale at Green Top near Richmond. Mine was made in Connecticut (not New York) and comes with a 1x-3x Weaver scope. I wasn't planning to get a scope, but I'm starting to warm up to the idea.

I still have a notion of moving more toward .45 Colt in the future, but for now, this goes well with my .38 Special revolvers. Thanks again.

-- Early impressions:

I bought the rifle used. It's in great shape. There is a barely visible scratch on the stock, and a tiny bit of wear on the scope. Nothing significant.

However, the rifle was filthy. I guess whoever sold it didn't bother to clean it after the last time they used it, nor did Green Top. No biggie since I even clean factory-new guns before I shoot them.

I decided to cycle through a bunch of .38 Special I had around the house, which unfortunately included some old wadcutters - WHOOPS. I should have read the manual I didn't get. I looked it up online later, and it clearly says not to use wadcutters. After half an hour of mild panic and hunting for the appropriate-sized screwdrivers, the rifle was partly disassembled, cleared and reassembled, back to the same condition as before the jam.

That issue aside, I love it as much as I can love a rifle I haven't shot yet. Some things just feel right, and Marlin lever action rifles are among those things. Other than the wadcutter issue, my other rounds all cycled wonderfully - Remington FMJ, Hornady Critical Defense, and some old round-nose lead bullets of unknown manufacture. You can work the action fast or slow, it's smooth and reliable either way.

I think the scope will be a big plus at 100 yards, but I might have a small preference for open sights at 25 yards (seems faster). But I'm glad I got one with a scope, because I have the option to use it or remove it.
The Following User Says Thank You to jknova For This Useful Post:
Old 09-03-2012, 08:12 PM
Rex Sacramento's Avatar
Rex Sacramento Rex Sacramento is offline
Target Shooter
Join Date: May 2012
Location: South Central New Mexico
Age: 43
Posts: 451
Thanks: 505
Thanked 398 Times in 217 Posts

If you can load .44 mag/.44spc then go with it. Otherwise .357 mag all the way. The .357 mag come in amazing and potent variety.
The Following User Says Thank You to Rex Sacramento For This Useful Post:
Old 09-03-2012, 08:16 PM
Rex Sacramento's Avatar
Rex Sacramento Rex Sacramento is offline
Target Shooter
Join Date: May 2012
Location: South Central New Mexico
Age: 43
Posts: 451
Thanks: 505
Thanked 398 Times in 217 Posts
Default .45 lc...

Originally Posted by jknova View Post
I still have a notion of moving more toward .45 Colt in the future.
I'm a big fan of this round. Tradition in spades, can belly up to .44 mag (nearly) and will stand toe to toe with .357. Rock on...
Old 09-09-2012, 10:44 PM
jknova's Avatar
jknova jknova is offline
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: NoVA
Posts: 3,072
Thanks: 583
Thanked 5,275 Times in 1,845 Posts

I took the Marlin to the range today for the first time. I was there with my nephew, that was the only gun we were shooting, and we were paying by the hour. So, I decided the scope's zeroing was "good enough" and we just went with it. In hindsight, I wish I'd either taken time to zero the scope, or not worried about it at all. For a while, I overcompensated between every shot because I didn't trust the scope. Later on, I decided to trust the scope, and did a lot better.

I proved to myself that - at least on a sunny day, when my hands aren't shaking, I don't have tunnel vision and my target isn't moving - I can put ten .357 Magnums into a grapefruit-sized target at 25 yards, in six seconds. That's good enough for now.

It's lots of fun. Shooting .38 Special (Remington and Winchester hardball) was almost as mild as shooting .22LR. No recoil to speak of and pretty quiet. Shooting .357 Magnum (Remington JSP), there still wasn't much recoil, but it was a lot louder.
Old 09-10-2012, 01:10 AM
agentalfie agentalfie is offline
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 2 Posts

Originally Posted by PBR Streetgang View Post
You might want to take a look at the Rossi lever gun both in .357 and .44 I did a lot of research before I bought one in .357 and am extremely pleased. I used to be a revolver guy before the auto boom in the early 70's and then jumped on the auto train. I am now finding my way back to revolvers again .I like the idea of a .38/.357 combo now and you have a great selection of ammo choices to do a variety of shooting.
Funnily enough i have today ordered a Rossi lever gun in .357 im happy to read that you like it mate
Old 09-10-2012, 02:46 AM
Steelviper's Avatar
Steelviper Steelviper is offline
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 312
Thanks: 77
Thanked 362 Times in 165 Posts

I like the .357 as well. But I keep seeing the .45 mentioned in the Rossi with no mention of the .454 Casull variant. Now there would be a show stopper. .45 LC for practice/ defense. Mild loaded .454 (if you call 44 mag levels mild) for hunting and full bore 454 for... Well anything you want. Rossi makes a 92 in it as well. That would be my first choice in a lever.

Couple that with a Ruger Super Red Hawk and a moon clip conversion now you got versatility 45 ACP, 45LC, and 454 Casull. When these first came out (initially by Puma) I thought it would eclipse the 44 magnum version. My prediction proved wrong.
Old 09-10-2012, 06:53 PM
H2OMAN's Avatar
H2OMAN H2OMAN is offline
Hovercraft Pilot, Retired
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Georgia
Posts: 1,523
Thanks: 1,659
Thanked 1,426 Times in 689 Posts

My Lever action and Revolver combo is .357 Magnum

If I could find a compact .45-70 revolver I would consider it
Old 09-10-2012, 08:10 PM
mefunkymxw's Avatar
mefunkymxw mefunkymxw is offline
that's like, your opinion
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Virginia
Age: 34
Posts: 17,158
Thanks: 10,677
Thanked 23,460 Times in 9,684 Posts

I actually had the same scenario a few months ago... I went with the 44 combo... I have a winchester 1892 lever and a smith and wesson 629 classic.
Old 09-17-2012, 09:40 PM
soundchaser's Avatar
soundchaser soundchaser is offline
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Toronto
Posts: 119
Thanks: 64
Thanked 134 Times in 44 Posts

Big game Bow Hunters (Griz, Elk, Moose) carry a .44 magnum revolver on their hip...just in case the arrow didn't make the perfect pass through.
Old 01-10-2013, 02:52 AM
German American German American is offline
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

I have been considering doing the 357 magnum combo as well. The only thing that has been holding me back is the trouble finding a 100% USA Made rifle that isn't blued. I'm a very practical guy, which is why buying something blued just won't happen with me. The problem with blued metal is it's extremely prone to rust. Just leaving a little bodily oils via a tiny, light finger print on it for a week gives a good chance of finding a touch of rust in it's place. In a SHTF Scenario, where dirt, grime, and certainly your finger prints will be common on your things and a proper daily wipe down of these things is pretty unlikely, a firearm that you heavily rely on is the last thing you would want to posses such severe vulnerabilities. From what I hear, Henry Rifles makes the most reliable and smoothest lever actions. They are also 100% USA made. Their Big Boy and Mare's Leg models are available in both 357 magnum and 44 magnum. The problem is that the Big Boy is $900 and I believe that that is higher than you were shooting for. Plus, it's ~8.5 lbs which may not be too heavy for you but it is for me. Then there's the Mare's Leg. Unfortunately, it's $950. Although, it does have an acceptable weight of ~5.5 lbs. Now, to your question of 357 magnum combo or 44 magnum combo. The 357 magnum rifle will have enough power for anything you might need. For the vast majority of the times you might need it, it will have ample power. It even has plenty of power for a full grown black bear. If you were to have the statistically unlikely bad luck to not only encounter, but also be close enough to something as big and tough as a full grown grizzly bear that you were forced to go for your revolver you might have to unload your the entire gun on the beast, but provided you put them all in it's chest and not somewhere less immediate like it's stomach, it's going down in a matter of seconds. The down side with the 357 magnum is it's limited ability in number of rounds it can hold as well as it's size and weight which stratle the line of too much in terms of hip carry, draw speed, maneuverability (like with multiple targets or just running, dodging, and making quick shots before ducking again), plus the diminished follow up shots speed that naturally comes with all magnum. However, all of these cons I just mentioned in the last sentence look some what mild when compared to their super size versions in the 44 magnum. Long story short, If you are set on these two magnum combos, go with the 357 magnum.
Old 09-30-2016, 01:47 PM
Backpack-shooter's Avatar
Backpack-shooter Backpack-shooter is offline
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 80
Thanks: 0
Thanked 128 Times in 52 Posts
Default Late to the party I know.

If I was wanting a matched handgun and rifle caliber I would choose .357 mag because of gun options like the .357 Coonan 1911, the Medusa M-47, and the Taurus 650 B2 CIA.



http://www.taurususa.com/product-details.cfm?id=267&category=Revolver&toggle=tr&bre adcrumbseries=CIA

If I wanted to be bugout/SHTF gun crazy (For the first mile walking anyway) I could strap the Coonan to my hip, toss the Medusa in my pack as a spare that eats almost anything 9mm or .357, stuff the Tarus into my ankle holster. Then I drop my mare's leg into my back scabbard and would have to hold my rifle in my hands.... not practical for walking, but if I had the money to buy those guns I probably wouldn't be walking 😉.
Old 09-30-2016, 09:10 PM
Vr1967 Vr1967 is online now
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 64
Thanks: 22
Thanked 90 Times in 41 Posts

I would get the .357 and shoot .38s in it. That way you can use the round in the handguns you already have.

My wife killed her 1st deer with a Rossi 92 loaded with a .38 SJHP. One shot at about 60 yards. 9 points, 205 pounds (extremely big deer for my area)
Old 10-01-2016, 07:54 AM
bigg777's Avatar
bigg777 bigg777 is online now
Target Shooter
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 486
Thanks: 117
Thanked 684 Times in 298 Posts

I have several .38/.357 revolvers and a Rossi R92 lever gun in .38/.357. IMO, you should stick with the .38/.357, unless you have grizz and moose near, since your object is to be prepared for SHTF, cost, availability and commonality all come into play. I'll have to say that the Rossi lever action is probably my favorite plinker and I have several carbine choices. Unless your father is going to buy .44 ammo, he can also take advantage of the ammo commonality.

I would prefer a Marlin 1894c but for $800 I can buy a Rossi and several hundred $$$ worth of ammo, or a Rossi and another revolver. I just couldn't justify the cost of the Marlin .357.

Last edited by bigg777; 10-01-2016 at 08:03 AM.. Reason: added info.
Old 10-01-2016, 08:46 AM
gotjunk gotjunk is online now
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 762
Thanks: 602
Thanked 1,050 Times in 440 Posts

To me the issue is simple. You own 38's now. Buying new revolvers in 44 would add a considerable costs to your plan. You can spend the savings on components and equipment. 357's from a rifle will be adequately sufficient for SD.
Old 10-01-2016, 09:46 AM
Rickity Plumber Rickity Plumber is offline
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 154
Thanks: 16
Thanked 174 Times in 80 Posts

At my local gun store, .357 mag Hornady 20 round box is $21.95. The .44 mag is $19.95 for 20 rds. Not too big a difference and certainly not the one factor to sway me either way.

That said, I have a Ruger Redhawk in .44 mag and also a SP101 in .357 mag. As a side I also have the SP101 in .22 which I will explain its significance to your thread.

I buy ammo weekly and am in the process of stockpiling enough to satisfy my needs whether a need exists real or not. I buy more .357 ammo than the .44. Right now I may have about 1500 rds of .357 while perhaps 200 rds of .44.

The .44 Ruger I tend to think of as a showpiece while the .357 is my carry/home defense weapon. The .22 SP101 is what my wife is learning to shoot on as she had a scary life or death situation and she wants to be prepared. When she is fully comfortable handling, cleaning, firing and familiar with the SP 101 in .22 then she will then move up to the .357 on the same platform. The only difference between the two is recoil and caliber.

I too am looking for a rifle fitted in either .357 or .44 to accommodate the ammo I have in stock. I just think that for defensive purposes against another human, this is a logical choice.

Am I looking to reach out past 400 yds to kill my attackers? I can not even see past 150 yds in my neighborhood here. So close quarter defense is what I am looking for.
I love my 30.06 Remington but the ammo I have on hand will do me well if a long distance precise shot is needed. I have about 120 rds of 30.06 right now.

Many different answers from many different posters but how many guns can you carry with you? I am looking for one rifle and one handgun for each person in my party and with ammo we can all share.
Old 10-01-2016, 09:54 AM
Rickity Plumber Rickity Plumber is offline
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 154
Thanks: 16
Thanked 174 Times in 80 Posts

Originally Posted by LongInTheTooth View Post
PBR: You split between Sw Fla nad NJ?
Some rather "interesting" info regarding "home defense" in NJ. On his last day in office, Corzine signed a "bill"...(AHHH, CORZINE, the "gift which keeps onn giving)...read on...The gist of the "Bill" is as follows,
if you have a handgun in your home, legally owned by you, and the documentation to prove same, and if you are not home at the time and your wife, SO, or any other family members residing with you having need to defend themselves therein, from imminent danger...if ANYONE other than you utilized said handgun...they get seven years for essentially defending themselves (mandatory), and you get three years (mandatory) for "NOT SECURING" said handgun. There are no exceptions...another DRACONIAN measure effectively added to the ULTRA-DRACONIAN "GRAVES ACT".
Just a heads up, in case you didn't know.:thumb

Here in NJ, we are severwly limited by "Compliance Mandates"...including no grandfather-clause protecting "items" of a modern semi-automatic configuration, legally-owned prior to enactment. Rather than surrender to the apparchik in Trenton, or being forced to sell out-of-state, I chose to remove and secure MY PROPERTY at an out-of-state location, devoid of such "restrictions/bans".

Even as a retired cop, there was no latitude granted nor recognized.
Rather than remaining "neutered", I chose to re-arm...and based upon the "political evil" trampling upon my rights...determined to do so in a very specific, non-threatening, non-tacticool...ergo, LEVER GUNS. We ALL grew up watching "Cowboy Shows", and a Lever Gun can easily be dismissed as "purely nostalgic".

I already had a S&W Mod 29, 6" barrel'd 44Mag/44Spc.,so I mated it with a pre-remlin Marlin 1894, in the appropriate 44 configuration. I should have bought the .357/.38 version at the same time, as a mate for my S&W Mod 15.4, 2", .38...but I didn't. No need to tell you of the rarity of finding even a REAL used Marlin 1894 in .357/.38. When Remington (CEREBUS) became the new owners, there have been too many quality-control issues...REAL New Marlins became extinct.

I considered the Rossi, 'cause of the convenience of the "loading gate", mainly for my wife as my "wing-man", so-to-speak, but even the local fun-shops were having acquisition problems.

One day this past Feb, I checked again, but no luck. I did see a "Henry" in the .357 cal, and after determining that I and my wife would not be repelling an invasion of Norks across the 38th parallel, picked up the Henry. Yeah, its "tube-fed", but as I indicated, under dire circumstances and necessity, she would just be watching my 6...the Henry is flawless, the bolt as slick as a glass rod on velvet!

The other nonsense about NewJerzeystan...no hollow-point bullets...yep, that's right...the restriction states NO HOLLOW-POINT BULLETS, it doesn't state simply no hollow-point cartridges, BULLETS...even just possessing a hollow-point .22cal bullet equals 7 yrs learning "manly things" whilst hangin' with the "guys" in State-run "Colleges", Savvy.

As the restrictive insanity spreads and proliferates, worse than an outbreak of Smallpox, in Trenton, not-withstanding that NJ is the most crowded and populous State, a Lever Gun with the overall calibre side-arm companion, and SOLID BULLETS, works for me. The penultimate K.I.S.S. and time-tested...appliances as a "cure " for legislatively mandated citizen-impotency...and it is NON-THREATENING. Perfect for this particular environment, should the need arise, and not-withstanding the HISTORY of the Lever-Gun...now-a-days its all about Perception.
Thank you for not "bowing" down to the level that Obama and Hilliary would. Good choice is keeping your firearms "out of state" or giving them up. Nanny's really care about us right? NOT!

I will never give up my guns. They are the last defense against dictatorship. I just keep buying more and more ammo for my guns.


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2016 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright © Kevin Felts 2006 - 2015,
Green theme by http://www.themesbydesign.net