I've been shooting for quite sometime, and my personal handguns have all been .45's.
However, now I find myself taking a closer look at the 10mm. The glock 20 holds that round, which is a plus cause I like glocks...
I'm thinking this only because of the fact that the 10 may be better for bear defense (of which we have lots of at our bol), people wearing heavy winter clothing, hunting hog or deer, etc...
my reloading bench is set up for .45 though, and I own two .45's...so I would have to buy two glock 20's and get the toolhead for the press, etc...(two is one, one is none)
I guess I have to wonder if the difference between the two is significant enough for the investment?
Recoil isnt a problem, as I am a big guy with big hands and while I hate the recoil of my shotguns (damn stock slams my cheek everytime), handgun recoil doesnt bother me.
anybody else ever think about this? what conclusions did you make?
However, now I find myself taking a closer look at the 10mm. The glock 20 holds that round, which is a plus cause I like glocks...
I'm thinking this only because of the fact that the 10 may be better for bear defense (of which we have lots of at our bol), people wearing heavy winter clothing, hunting hog or deer, etc...
my reloading bench is set up for .45 though, and I own two .45's...so I would have to buy two glock 20's and get the toolhead for the press, etc...(two is one, one is none)
I guess I have to wonder if the difference between the two is significant enough for the investment?
Recoil isnt a problem, as I am a big guy with big hands and while I hate the recoil of my shotguns (damn stock slams my cheek everytime), handgun recoil doesnt bother me.
anybody else ever think about this? what conclusions did you make?